Phosphorylation of TIP60 Suppresses 53BP1 Localization at DNA Damage Sites

REFERENCES

• Hustedt N, Durocher D. 2016. The control of DNA repair by the cell cycle. Nat Cell Biol 19:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price BD, D'Andrea AD. 2013. Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 152:1344–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeggo PA, Downs JA. 2014. Roles of chromatin remodellers in DNA double strand break repair. Exp Cell Res 329:69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauer MH, Gasser SM. 2017. Chromatin and nucleosome dynamics in DNA damage and repair. Genes Dev 31:2204–2221. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.307702.117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar S, Gursoy-Yuzugullu O, Parasuram R, Price BD. 2017. The tale of a tail: histone H4 acetylation and the repair of DNA breaks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372:20160284. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting SF, Callén E, Wong N, Chen H-T, Polato F, Gunn A, Bothmer A, Feldhahn N, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Cao L, Xu X, Deng C-X, Finkel T, Nussenzweig M, Stark JM, Nussenzweig A. 2010. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman P, Aly A, Escandell JM, Pieterse M, Bartkova J, van der Gulden H, Hiddingh S, Thanasoula M, Kulkarni A, Yang Q, Haffty BG, Tommiska J, Blomqvist C, Drapkin R, Adams DJ, Nevanlinna H, Bartek J, Tarsounas M, Ganesan S, Jonkers J. 2010. 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:688–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Cho NW, Cui G, Manion EM, Shanbhag NM, Botuyan MV, Mer G, Greenberg RA. 2013. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao K-Y, Mizzen CA. 2013. Histone H4 deacetylation facilitates 53BP1 DNA damage signaling and double-strand break repair. J Mol Cell Biol 5:157–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjs066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet K, Fradet-Turcotte A, Avvakumov N, Lambert J-P, Roques C, Pandita RK, Paquet E, Herst P, Gingras A-C, Pandita TK, Legube G, Doyon Y, Durocher D, Côté J. 2016. The TIP60 complex regulates bivalent chromatin recognition by 53BP1 through direct H4K20me binding and H2AK15 acetylation. Mol Cell 62:409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke TL, Sanchez-Bailon MP, Chiang K, Reynolds JJ, Herrero-Ruiz J, Bandeiras TM, Matias PM, Maslen SL, Skehel JM, Stewart GS, Davies CC. 2017. PRMT5-dependent methylation of the TIP60 coactivator RUVBL1 is a key regulator of homologous recombination. Mol Cell 65:900–916.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivanand S, Rhoades S, Jiang Q, Lee JV, Benci J, Zhang J, Yuan S, Viney I, Zhao S, Carrer A, Bennett MJ, Minn AJ, Weljie AM, Greenberg RA, Wellen KE. 2017. Nuclear acetyl-CoA production by ACLY promotes homologous recombination. Mol Cell 67:252–265.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MD, Benlekbir S, Fradet-Turcotte A, Sherker A, Julien J-P, McEwan A, Noordermeer SM, Sicheri F, Rubinstein JL, Durocher D. 2016. The structural basis of modified nucleosome recognition by 53BP1. Nature 536:100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothkamm K, Kruger I, Thompson LH, Lobrich M. 2003. Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 23:5706–5715. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.16.5706-5715.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escribano-Díaz C, Orthwein A, Fradet-Turcotte A, Xing M, Young JTF, Tkáč J, Cook MA, Rosebrock AP, Munro M, Canny MD, Xu D, Durocher D. 2013. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol Cell 49:872–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JR, Sossick AJ, Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. 2012. BRCA1-associated exclusion of 53BP1 from DNA damage sites underlies temporal control of DNA repair. J Cell Sci 125:3529–3534. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.105353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok MTS, Henderson BR. 2012. Three-dimensional imaging reveals the spatial separation of γH2AX-MDC1-53BP1 and RNF8-RNF168-BRCA1-A complexes at ionizing radiation-induced foci. Radiother Oncol 103:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemercier C, Legube G, Caron C, Louwagie M, Garin J, Trouche D, Khochbin S. 2003. Tip60 acetyltransferase activity is controlled by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 278:4713–4718. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211811200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo F, Zhuang X, Yao PY, Qin B, Su Z, Zang J, Wang Z, Zhang J, Dou Z, Tian C, Teng M, Niu L, Hill DL, Fang G, Ding X, Fu C, Liu X, Yao X. 2016. Acetylation of Aurora B by TIP60 ensures accurate chromosomal segregation. Nat Chem Biol 12:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Nagai Y, Deng G, Ohtani T, Zhu Z, Zhou Z, Zhang H, Ji MQ, Lough JW, Samanta A, Hancock WW, Greene MI. 2014. Dynamic interactions between TIP60 and p300 regulate FOXP3 function through a structural switch defined by a single lysine on TIP60. Cell Rep 7:1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JB, Horst A, Wan T, Kim M-S, Auchampach J, Lough J. 2016. Depletion of Tip60 from in vivo cardiomyocytes increases myocyte density, followed by cardiac dysfunction, myocyte fallout and lethality. PLoS One 11:e0164855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164855.
   Google Scholar
• Ruzankina Y, Pinzon-Guzman C, Asare A, Ong T, Pontano L, Cotsarelis G, Zediak VP, Velez M, Bhandoola A, Brown EJ. 2007. Deletion of the developmentally essential gene ATR in adult mice leads to age-related phenotypes and stem cell loss. Cell Stem Cell 1:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charvet C, Wissler M, Brauns-Schubert P, Wang S-J, Tang Y, Sigloch FC, Mellert H, Brandenburg M, Lindner SE, Breit B, Green DR, McMahon SB, Borner C, Gu W, Maurer U. 2011. Phosphorylation of Tip60 by GSK-3 determines the induction of PUMA and apoptosis by p53. Mol Cell 42:584–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-Y, Li TY, Liu Q, Zhang C, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang S-M, Lian G, Liu Q, Ruan K, Wang Z, Zhang C-S, Chien K-Y, Wu J, Li Q, Han J, Lin S-C. 2012. GSK3-TIP60-ULK1 signaling pathway links growth factor deprivation to autophagy. Science 336:477–481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie T, Yang S, Ma H, Zhang L, Lu F, Tao K, Wang R, Yang R, Huang L, Mao Z, Yang Q. 2016. Regulation of ER stress-induced autophagy by GSK3β-TIP60-ULK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis 7:e2563. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.423.
   Google Scholar
• Brauns-Schubert P, Schubert F, Wissler M, Weiss M, Schlicher L, Bessler S, Safavi M, Miething C, Borner C, Brummer T, Maurer U. 2018. CDK9-mediated phosphorylation controls the interaction of TIP60 with the transcriptional machinery. EMBO Rep 19:244–256. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikura T, Ogryzko VV, Grigoriev M, Groisman R, Wang J, Horikoshi M, Scully R, Qin J, Nakatani Y. 2000. Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell 102:463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00051-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington LS, Gautier J. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu Rev Genet 45:247–271. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanbhag NM, Rafalska-Metcalf IU, Balane-Bolivar C, Janicki SM, Greenberg RA. 2010. ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 141:970–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh M-C, Mennella TA, Sawa C, Berthelet S, Krogan NJ, Wolek A, Podolny V, Carpenter LR, Greenblatt JF, Baetz K, Buratowski S. 2006. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes Dev 20:660–665. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1388106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikura T, Tashiro S, Kakino A, Shima H, Jacob N, Amunugama R, Yoder K, Izumi S, Kuraoka I, Tanaka K, Kimura H, Ikura M, Nishikubo S, Ito T, Muto A, Miyagawa K, Takeda S, Fishel R, Igarashi K, Kamiya K. 2007. DNA damage-dependent acetylation and ubiquitination of H2AX enhances chromatin dynamics. Mol Cell Biol 27:7028–7040. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00579-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf M, Auger A, Monnet-Saksouk J, Brodeur J, Piquet S, Cramet M, Bouchard N, Lacoste N, Utley RT, Gaudreau L, Côté J. 2010. NuA4-dependent acetylation of nucleosomal histones H4 and H2A directly stimulates incorporation of H2A.Z by the SWR1 complex. J Biol Chem 285:15966–15977. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.117069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburini BA, Tyler JK. 2005. Localized histone acetylation and deacetylation triggered by the homologous recombination pathway of double-strand DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 25:4903–4913. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.12.4903-4913.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KM, Tjeertes JV, Coates J, Legube G, Polo SE, Britton S, Jackson SP. 2010. Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17:1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidoli S, Bhanu NV, Karch KR, Wang X, Garcia BA. 2016. Complete workflow for analysis of histone post-translational modifications using bottom-up mass spectrometry: from histone extraction to data analysis. J Vis Exp 2016:e54112. https://doi.org/10.3791/54112.
   Google Scholar
• Sidoli S, Lin S, Xiong L, Bhanu NV, Karch KR, Johansen E, Hunter C, Mollah S, Garcia BA. 2015. Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical mass spectra (SWATH) analysis for characterization and quantification of histone post-translational modifications. Mol Cell Proteomics 14:2420–2428. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.O114.046102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z-F, Lin S, Molden RC, Cao X-J, Bhanu NV, Wang X, Sidoli S, Liu S, Garcia BA. 2015. EpiProfile quantifies histone peptides with modifications by extracting retention time and intensity in high-resolution mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 14:1696–1707. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M114.046011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar