Multi-BRCT Domain Protein Brc1 Links Rhp18/Rad18 and γH2A To Maintain Genome Stability during S Phase

REFERENCES

• Tomasetti C, Li L, Vogelstein B. 2017. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science 355:1330. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubbs A, Nussenzweig A. 2017. Endogenous DNA damage as a source of genomic instability in cancer. Cell 168:644–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera A, Garcia-Muse T. 2013. Causes of genome instability. Annu Rev Genet 47:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadaleta MC, Noguchi E. 2017. Regulation of DNA replication through natural impediments in the eukaryotic genome. Genes 8:98. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8030098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2009. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair 8:1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortez D. 2015. Preventing replication fork collapse to maintain genome integrity. DNA Repair 32:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.04.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer DR, Rhind N. 2017. The intra-S checkpoint responses to DNA damage. Genes 8:74. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8020074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2010. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:208–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenzhak S, Mejía-Ramírez E, Williams JS, Schaffer L, Hammond JA, Head SR, Russell P. 2010. Rad3ATR decorates critical chromosomal domains with γH2A to protect genome integrity during S-phase in fission yeast. PLoS Genet 6:e1001032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia-Ramirez E, Limbo O, Langerak P, Russell P. 2015. Critical function of γH2A in S-phase. PLoS Genet 11:e1005517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005517.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura TM, Du L-L, Redon C, Russell P. 2004. Histone H2A Phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24:6215–6230. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.14.6215-6230.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JS, Williams RS, Dovey CL, Guenther G, Tainer JA, Russell P. 2010. γH2A binds Brc1 to maintain genome integrity during S-phase. EMBO J 29:1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du LL, Nakamura TM, Russell P. 2006. Histone modification-dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 20:1583–1596. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1422606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofueva S, Du LL, Limbo O, Williams JS, Russell P. 2010. BRCT domain interactions with phospho-histone H2A target Crb2 to chromatin at double-strand breaks and maintain the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 30:4732–4743. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00413-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei Y, Wang HT, Zhai Y, Russell P, Du LL. 2014. Mdb1, a fission yeast homolog of human MDC1, modulates DNA damage response and mitotic spindle function. PLoS One 9:e97028. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097028.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Russell P. 2013. Brc1 links replication stress response and centromere function. Cell Cycle 12:1665–1671. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.24900.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hang LE, Peng J, Tan W, Szakal B, Menolfi D, Sheng Z, Lobachev K, Branzei D, Feng W, Zhao X. 2015. Rtt107 is a multifunctional scaffold supporting replication progression with partner SUMO and ubiquitin ligases. Mol Cell 60:268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.08.023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wan B, Hang LE, Zhao X. 2016. Multi-BRCT scaffolds use distinct strategies to support genome maintenance. Cell Cycle 15:2561–2570. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2016.1218102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GP, Brown JA, Glover JN, Kobor MS. 2016. Rtt107 BRCT domains act as a targeting module in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair 37:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balint A, Kim T, Gallo D, Cussiol JR, Bastos de Oliveira FM, Yimit A, Ou J, Nakato R, Gurevich A, Shirahige K, Smolka MB, Zhang Z, Brown GW. 2015. Assembly of Slx4 signaling complexes behind DNA replication forks. EMBO J 34:2182–2197. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201591190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohouo PY, Bastos de Oliveira FM, Almeida BS, Smolka MB. 2010. DNA damage signaling recruits the Rtt107-Slx4 scaffolds via Dpb11 to mediate replication stress response. Mol Cell 39:300–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray Chaudhuri A, Callen E, Ding X, Gogola E, Duarte AA, Lee JE, Wong N, Lafarga V, Calvo JA, Panzarino NJ, John S, Day A, Crespo AV, Shen B, Starnes LM, de Ruiter JR, Daniel JA, Konstantinopoulos PA, Cortez D, Cantor SB, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Ge K, Jonkers J, Rottenberg S, Sharan SK, Nussenzweig A. 2016. Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells. Nature 535:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkade HM, Bugg SJ, Lindsay HD, Carr AM, O'Connell MJ. 1999. Rad18 is required for DNA repair and checkpoint responses in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10:2905–2918. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.10.9.2905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheedy DM, Dimitrova D, Rankin JK, Bass KL, Lee KM, Tapia-Alveal C, Harvey SH, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2005. Brc1-mediated DNA repair and damage tolerance. Genetics 171:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.044966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein KA, Gangloff S, Rothstein R. 2010. The RecQ DNA helicases in DNA repair. Annu Rev Genet 44:393–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102209-163602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez A, Sharma S, Rozenzhak S, Roguev A, Krogan NJ, Chabes A, Russell P. 2012. Replication fork collapse and genome instability in a deoxycytidylate deaminase mutant. Mol Cell Biol 32:4445–4454. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01062-12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pebernard S, McDonald WH, Pavlova Y, Yates JR, Boddy MN. 2004. Nse1, Nse2, and a novel subunit of the Smc5-Smc6 complex, Nse3, play a crucial role in meiosis. Mol Biol Cell 15:4866–4876. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-05-0436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morikawa H, Morishita T, Kawane S, Iwasaki H, Carr AM, Shinagawa H. 2004. Rad62 protein functionally and physically associates with the Smc5/Smc6 protein complex and is required for chromosome integrity and recombination repair in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24:9401–9413. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9401-9413.2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pebernard S, Wohlschlegel J, McDonald WH, Yates JR, Boddy MN. 2006. The Nse5-Nse6 dimer mediates DNA repair roles of the Smc5-Smc6 complex. Mol Cell Biol 26:1617–1630. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.5.1617-1630.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Rozenzhak S, Russell P. 2013. γH2A-binding protein Brc1 affects centromere function in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 33:1410–1416. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01654-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KM, Nizza S, Hayes T, Bass KL, Irmisch A, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2007. Brc1-mediated rescue of Smc5/6 deficiency: requirement for multiple nucleases and a novel Rad18 function. Genetics 175:1585–1595. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.067801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez A, Roguev A, Krogan NJ, Russell P. 2015. Genetic interaction landscape reveals critical requirements for Schizosaccharomyces pombe Brc1 in DNA damage response mutants. G3 (Bethesda) 5:953–962. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.115.017251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez A, Russell P. 2015. Ku stabilizes replication rorks in the absence of Brc1. PLoS One 10:e0126598. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126598.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Mutter-Rottmayer E, Zlatanou A, Vaziri C, Yang Y. 2017. Mechanisms of postreplication DNA repair. Genes 8:64. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8020064.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung CCY, Glover JNM. 2011. BRCT domains: Easy as one, two, three. Cell Cycle 10:2461–2470. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.15.16312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhardt HC, Yaffe MB. 2013. Phospho-Ser/Thr-binding domains: navigating the cell cycle and DNA damage response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:563–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notenboom V, Hibbert RG, van Rossum-Fikkert SE, Olsen JV, Mann M, Sixma TK. 2007. Functional characterization of Rad18 domains for Rad6, ubiquitin, DNA binding and PCNA modification. Nucleic Acids Res 35:5819–5830. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima S, Lan L, Kanno S-i, Usami N, Kobayashi K, Mori M, Shiomi T, Yasui A. 2006. Replication-dependent and -independent responses of RAD18 to DNA damage in human cells. J Biol Chem 281:34687–34695. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M605545200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huttner D, Ulrich HD. 2008. Cooperation of replication protein A with the ubiquitin ligase Rad18 in DNA damage bypass. Cell Cycle 7:3629–3633. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.23.7166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD. 2008. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass Is mediated by replication protein A. Mol Cell 29:625–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froget B, Blaisonneau J, Lambert S, Baldacci G. 2008. Cleavage of stalled forks by fission yeast Mus81/Eme1 in absence of DNA replication checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 19:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-07-0728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseaulin L, Yamada Y, Tsutsui Y, Russell P, Iwasaki H, Arcangioli B. 2008. Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks. EMBO J 27:1378–1387. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2008. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:297–308. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, Yeh ETH. 2010. Regulation of DNA repair through de-SUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol Cell 39:333–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyer W-D, Ehmsen KT, Liu J. 2010. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu Rev Genet 44:113–139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Heyer W-D. 2008. Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res 18:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2008.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass KL, Murray JM, O'Connell MJ. 2012. Brc1-dependent recovery from replication stress. J Cell Sci 125:2753–2764. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.103119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raschle M, Smeenk G, Hansen RK, Temu T, Oka Y, Hein MY, Nagaraj N, Long DT, Walter JC, Hofmann K, Storchova Z, Cox J, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N, Mann M. 2015. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links. Science 348:1253671. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DJ, van der Weyden L, Gergely FV, Arends MJ, Ng BL, Tannahill D, Kanaar R, Markus A, Morris BJ, Bradley A. 2005. BRCTx is a novel, highly conserved RAD18-interacting protein. Mol Cell Biol 25:779–788. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.2.779-788.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Chen H, Kim H, Huen MS, Chen J, Huang J. 2012. RAD18-BRCTx interaction is required for efficient repair of UV-induced DNA damage. DNA Repair 11:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung GP, Lee L, Schmidt TI, Shirahige K, Kobor MS. 2011. Rtt107 is required for recruitment of the SMC5/6 complex to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem 286:26250–26257. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.235200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsburg SL, Rhind N. 2006. Basic methods for fission yeast. Yeast 23:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahler J, Wu JQ, Longtine MS, Shah NG, AMcKenzie 3rd, Steever AB, Wach A, Philippsen P, Pringle JR. 1998. Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14:943–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199807)14:10<943::AID-YEA292>3.3.CO;2-P.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasto JJ, Carnahan RH, Hayes McDonald W, Gould KL. 2001. Vectors and gene targeting modules for tandem affinity purification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 18:657–662. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi C, Garabedian MV, Malik M, Noguchi E. 2008. A vector system for genomic FLAG epitope-tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biotechnol J 3:1280–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200800140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar