Nontranscriptional Function of FOXO1/DAF-16 Contributes to Translesion DNA Synthesis

REFERENCES

• Eijkelenboom A, Burgering BM. 2013. FOXOs: signalling integrators for homeostasis maintenance. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:83–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calnan DR, Brunet A. 2008. The FoxO code. Oncogene 27:2276–2288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Chen J, Yuan Z. 2012. Post-translational regulation of FOXO. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 44:897–901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abbs/gms067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunet A, Bonni A, Zigmond MJ, Lin MZ, Juo P, Hu LS, Anderson MJ, Arden KC, Blenis J, Greenberg ME. 1999. Akt promotes cell survival by phosphorylating and inhibiting a Forkhead transcription factor. Cell 96:857–868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80595-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. 1993. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 366:461–464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/366461a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CT. 2006. The search for DAF-16/FOXO transcriptional targets: approaches and discoveries. Exp Gerontol 41:910–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2006.06.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullet JM. 2015. DAF-16 target identification in C. elegans: past, present and future. Biogerontology 16:221–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10522-014-9527-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garinis GA, van der Horst GT, Vijg J, Hoeijmakers JH. 2008. DNA damage and ageing: new-age ideas for an age-old problem. Nat Cell Biol 10:1241–1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1108-1241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher B, Garinis GA, Hoeijmakers JH. 2008. Age to survive: DNA damage and aging. Trends Genet 24:77–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijk M, Typas D, Mullenders L, Pines A. 2014. Insight in the multilevel regulation of NER. Exp Cell Res 329:116–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.08.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang W. 2014. An overview of Y-family DNA polymerases and a case study of human DNA polymerase eta. Biochemistry 53:2793–2803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi500019s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD. 2008. Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein A. Mol Cell 29:625–636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe K, Tateishi S, Kawasuji M, Tsurimoto T, Inoue H, Yamaizumi M. 2004. Rad18 guides polη to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J 23:3886–3896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haracska L, Johnson RE, Unk I, Phillips B, Hurwitz J, Prakash L, Prakash S. 2001. Physical and functional interactions of human DNA polymerase eta with PCNA. Mol Cell Biol 21:7199–7206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.21.7199-7206.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiomi Y, Masutani C, Hanaoka F, Kimura H, Tsurimoto T. 2007. A second proliferating cell nuclear antigen loader complex, Ctf18-replication factor C, stimulates DNA polymerase eta activity. J Biol Chem 282:20906–20914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M610102200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttner D, Ulrich HD. 2008. Cooperation of replication protein A with the ubiquitin ligase Rad18 in DNA damage bypass. Cell Cycle 7:3629–3633. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.23.7166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RE, Kondratick CM, Prakash S, Prakash L. 1999. hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. Science 285:263–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5425.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masutani C, Kusumoto R, Yamada A, Dohmae N, Yokoi M, Yuasa M, Araki M, Iwai S, Takio K, Hanaoka F. 1999. The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase eta. Nature 399:700–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/21447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JH, Lindsey-Boltz LA, Kemp M, Mason AC, Wold MS, Sancar A. 2010. Reconstitution of RPA-covered single-stranded DNA-activated ATR-Chk1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13660–13665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007856107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran H, Brunet A, Grenier JM, Datta SR, Fornace AJ, Jr, DiStefano PS, Chiang LW, Greenberg ME. 2002. DNA repair pathway stimulated by the forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a through the Gadd45 protein. Science 296:530–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1068712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei D, Foiani M. 2008. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:297–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomgarden RD, Lupardus PJ, Soni DV, Yee MC, Ford JM, Cimprich KA. 2006. Opposing effects of the UV lesion repair protein XPA and UV bypass polymerase eta on ATR checkpoint signaling. EMBO J 25:2605–2614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai WB, Chung YM, Takahashi Y, Xu Z, Hu MC. 2008. Functional interaction between FOXO3a and ATM regulates DNA damage response. Nat Cell Biol 10:460–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marechal A, Zou L. 2015. RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response. Cell Res 25:9–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2014.147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirota K, Sakamaki J, Ishida J, Shimamoto Y, Nishihara S, Kodama N, Ohta K, Yamamoto M, Tanimoto K, Fukamizu A. 2008. A combination of HNF-4 and Foxo1 is required for reciprocal transcriptional regulation of glucokinase and glucose-6-phosphatase genes in response to fasting and feeding. J Biol Chem 283:32432–32441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806179200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapierre LR, Hansen M. 2012. Lessons from C. elegans: signaling pathways for longevity. Trends Endocrinol Metab 23:637–644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2012.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson ST, Johnson TE. 2001. daf-16 integrates developmental and environmental inputs to mediate aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr Biol 11:1975–1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00594-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lans H, Marteijn JA, Schumacher B, Hoeijmakers JH, Jansen G, Vermeulen W. 2010. Involvement of global genome repair, transcription coupled repair, and chromatin remodeling in UV DNA damage response changes during development. PLoS Genet 6:e1000941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000941.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang F, Marshall CB, Li GY, Yamamoto K, Mak TW, Ikura M. 2009. Synergistic interplay between promoter recognition and CBP/p300 coactivator recruitment by FOXO3a. ACS Chem Biol 4:1017–1027. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cb900190u.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falbo KB, Alabert C, Katou Y, Wu S, Han J, Wehr T, Xiao J, He X, Zhang Z, Shi Y, Shirahige K, Pasero P, Shen X. 2009. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1167–1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niimi A, Chambers AL, Downs JA, Lehmann AR. 2012. A role for chromatin remodellers in replication of damaged DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 40:7393–7403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Dejsuphong D, Adelmant G, Ceccaldi R, Yang K, Marto JA, D'Andrea AD. 2014. Transcriptional repressor ZBTB1 promotes chromatin remodeling and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol Cell 54:107–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel CG, Dowen RH, Lourenco GF, Kirienko NV, Heimbucher T, West JA, Bowman SK, Kingston RE, Dillin A, Asara JM, Ruvkun G. 2013. DAF-16 employs the chromatin remodeller SWI/SNF to promote stress resistance and longevity. Nat Cell Biol 15:491–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatta M, Cirillo LA. 2007. Chromatin opening and stable perturbation of core histone:DNA contacts by FoxO1. J Biol Chem 282:35583–35593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704735200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujimoto M, Takaki E, Takii R, Tan K, Prakasam R, Hayashida N, Iemura S, Natsume T, Nakai A. 2012. RPA assists HSF1 access to nucleosomal DNA by recruiting histone chaperone FACT. Mol Cell 48:182–194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daitoku H, Sakamaki J, Fukamizu A. 2011. Regulation of FoxO transcription factors by acetylation and protein-protein interactions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813:1954–1960. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamaki J, Daitoku H, Yoshimochi K, Miwa M, Fukamizu A. 2009. Regulation of FOXO1-mediated transcription and cell proliferation by PARP-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382:497–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallis M, Morra R, Barkauskaite E, Ahel I. 2014. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in regulation of chromatin structure and the DNA damage response. Chromosoma 123:79–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-013-0442-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolae CM, Aho ER, Vlahos AH, Choe KN, De S, Karras GI, Moldovan GL. 2014. The ADP-ribosyltransferase PARP10/ARTD10 interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and is required for DNA damage tolerance. J Biol Chem 289:13627–13637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.556340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow C, Hirotsune S, Paylor R, Liyanage M, Eckhaus M, Collins F, Shiloh Y, Crawley JN, Ried T, Tagle D, Wynshaw-Boris A. 1996. Atm-deficient mice: a paradigm of ataxia telangiectasia. Cell 86:159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80086-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EJ, Baltimore D. 2000. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev 14:397–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.14.4.397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosaka T, Biggs WH, III, Tieu D, Boyer AD, Varki NM, Cavenee WK, Arden KC. 2004. Disruption of forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) family members in mice reveals their functional diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:2975–2980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400093101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Clark AB, McCulloch SD, Yuan T, Bronson RT, Kunkel TA, Kucherlapati R. 2006. Increased susceptibility to UV-induced skin carcinogenesis in polymerase eta-deficient mice. Cancer Res 66:87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller MM, Castells-Roca L, Babu V, Ermolaeva MA, Muller RU, Frommolt P, Williams AB, Greiss S, Schneider JI, Benzing T, Schermer B, Schumacher B. 2014. DAF-16/FOXO and EGL-27/GATA promote developmental growth in response to persistent somatic DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 16:1168–1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb3071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ro SH, Liu D, Yeo H, Paik JH. 2013. FoxOs in neural stem cell fate decision. Arch Biochem Biophys 534:55–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2012.07.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tothova Z, Gilliland DG. 2007. FoxO transcription factors and stem cell homeostasis: insights from the hematopoietic system. Cell Stem Cell 1:140–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. 2013. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153:1194–1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar