Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 Checkpoint Kinase in Signaling Double-Strand Breaks during the Meiotic Cell Cycle

REFERENCES

• Alani, E., R. Padmore, and N. Kleckner. 1990. Analysis of wild-type and rad50 mutants of yeast suggests an intimate relationship between meiotic chromosome synapsis and recombination. Cell 61:419–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylon, Y., and M. Kupiec. 2003. The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6585–6596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailis, J. M., and G. S. Roeder. 1998. Synaptonemal complex morphogenesis and sister-chromatid cohesion require Mek1-dependent phosphorylation of a meiotic chromosomal protein. Genes Dev. 12:3551–3563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barlow, C., M. Liyanage, P. B. Moens, M. Tarsounas, K. Nagashima, K. Brown, S. Rottinghaus, S. P. Jackson, D. Tagle, T. Ried, and A. Wynshaw-Boris. 1998. Atm deficiency results in severe meiotic disruption as early as leptonema of prophase I. Development 125:4007–4017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. K., D. Park, L. Xu, and N. Kleckner. 1992. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation, and cell cycle progression. Cell 69:439–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo, J. A., A. L. Johnson, S. G. Sedwick, and R. S. Cha. 2008. Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132:758–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carballo, J. A., and R. S. Cha. 2007. Meiotic roles of Mec1, a budding yeast homolog of mammalian ATR/ATM. Chromosome Res. 15:539–550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cartagena-Lirola, H., I. Guerini, V. Viscardi, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2006. Budding yeast Sae2 is an in vivo target of the Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases during meiosis. Cell Cycle 5:1549–1559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, S., and I. Herskowitz. 1998. Gametogenesis in yeast is regulated by a transcriptional cascade dependent on Ndt80. Mol. Cell 1:685–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerici, M., D. Mantiero, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2006. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling. EMBO Rep. 7:212–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furuse, M., Y. Nagase, H. Tsubouchi, K. Murakami-Murofushi, T. Shibata, and K. Ohta. 1998. Distinct roles of two separable in vitro activities of yeast Mre11 in mitotic and meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 17:6412–6425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. S., C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 2001. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 8:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grushcow, J. M., T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop. 1999. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153:607–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochwagen, A., and A. Amon. 2006. Checking your breaks: surveillance mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Curr. Biol. 16:217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell. 1992. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kee, K., and S. Keeney. 2002. Functional interactions between SPO11 and REC102 during initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 160:111–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keegan, K. S., D. A. Holtzman, A. W. Plug, E. R. Christenson, E. E. Brainerd, G. Flaggs, N. J. Bentley, E. M. Taylor, M. S. Meyn, S. B. Moss, A. M. Carr, T. Ashley, and M. F. Hoekstra. 1996. The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes. Genes Dev. 10:2423–2437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88:375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, S., and N. Kleckner. 1995. Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5′ strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11274–11278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, S. J., J. K. Duong, and D. F. Stern. 2004. A Ddc2-Rad53 fusion protein can bypass the requirements for RAD9 and MRC1 in Rad53 activation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:5443–5455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., I. Guerini, V. Baldo, and M. Clerici. 2008. Surveillance mechanisms monitoring chromosome breaks during mitosis and meiosis. DNA Repair 7:545–557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longhese, M. P., D. Mantiero, and M. Clerici. 2006. The cellular response to chromosome breakage. Mol. Microbiol. 60:1099–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydall, D., Y. Nikolsky, D. K. Bishop, and T. Weinert. 1996. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383:840–843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malkova, A., L. Ross, D. Dawson, M. F. Hoekstra, and J. E. Haber. 1996. Meiotic recombination initiated by a double-strand break in rad50 delta yeast cells otherwise unable to initiate meiotic recombination. Genetics 143:741–754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mantiero, D., M. Clerici, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2007. Dual role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tel1 in the checkpoint response to double-strand breaks. EMBO Rep. 8:380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, A. L., and A. Amon. 2004. Meiosis: cell-cycle controls shuffle and deal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, A. H. Z., and N. Kleckner. 1997. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics 146:797–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau, S., J. R. Ferguson, and L. S. Symington. 1999. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:556–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairz, K., and F. Klein. 1997. mre11S—a yeast mutation that blocks double-strand-break processing and permits nonhomologous synapsis in meiosis. Genes Dev. 11:2272–2290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakada, D., K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2003. ATM-related Tel1 associates with double-strand breaks through an Xrs2-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 16:1957–1962.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. J., and S. Keeney. 2006. Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination. Nature 442:153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, M. J., J. Pan, and S. Keeney. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, H., X. Li, E. Job, C. Park, D. Moazed, S. P. Gygi, and N. Hollingsworth. 2007. Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:5456–5467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, H., L. Wan, B. Baumgartner, D. Schaefer, J. Loidl, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2005. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:5804–5818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paciotti, V., M. Clerici, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2000. The checkpoint protein Ddc2, functionally related to S. pombe Rad26, interacts with Mec1 and is regulated by Mec1-dependent phosphorylation in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 14:2046–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. L., and R. S. Hawley. 2004. The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20:525–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicioli, A., C. Lucca, G. Liberi, F. Marini, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, A. Romano, P. P. Di Fiore, and M. Foiani. 1999. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J. 18:6561–6572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinz, S., A. Amon, and F. Klein. 1997. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 146:781–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, Y., J. Bachant, H. Wang, F. Hu, D. Liu, M. Tetzlaff, and S. J. Elledge. 1999. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by Chk1 and Rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286:1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner. 1994. Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell 76:51–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner. 1997. Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90:1123–1135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shinohara, M., K. Sakai, T. Ogawa, and A. Shinohara. 2003. The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 164:855–865.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, Z., J. Hsiao, D. S. Fay, and D. F. Stern. 1998. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 281:272–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, F. D., F. Yang, A. Chi, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and D. Durocher. 2005. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr. Biol. 15:1364–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. A., and F. W. Stahl. 1999. Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153:621–641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ubersax, J. A., E. L. Woodbury, P. N. Quang, M. Paraz, J. D. Blethrow, K. Shah, K. M. Shokat, and D. O. Morgan. 2003. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425:859–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usui, T., H. Ogawa, and J. H. J. Petrini. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard, J. E., C. S. Gilbert, C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 1998. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage. EMBO J. 17:5679–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, L., T. de los Santos, C. Zhang, K. Shokat, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2004. Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woltering, D., B. Baumgartner, S. Bagchi, B. Larkin, J. Loidl, T. de los Santos, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2000. Meiotic segregation, synapsis, and recombination checkpoint functions require physical interaction between the chromosomal proteins Red1p and Hop1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6646–6658.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, L., M. Ajimura, R. Padmore, C. Klein, and N. Kleckner. 1995. NDT80, a meiosis-specific gene required for exit from pachytene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6572–6581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, L., B. M. Weiner, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 11:106–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu, Y., T. Ashley, E. E. Brainerd, R. T. Bronson, M. S. Meyn, and D. Baltimore. 1996. Targeted disruption of ATM leads to growth retardation, chromosomal fragmentation during meiosis, immune defects, and thymic lymphoma. Genes Dev. 10:2411–2422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., E. G. D. Muller, and R. Rothstein. 1998. A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools. Mol. Cell 2:329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, L., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542–1548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar