Identification by Random Mutagenesis of Functional Domains in KREPB5 That Differentially Affect RNA Editing between Life Cycle Stages of Trypanosoma brucei

REFERENCES

• Sutton RE, Boothroyd JC. 1986. Evidence for trans splicing in trypanosomes. Cell 47:527–535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(86)90617-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borst P, Cross GA. 1982. Molecular basis for trypanosome antigenic variation. Cell 29:291–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90146-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferguson MA, Cross GA. 1984. Myristylation of the membrane form of a Trypanosoma brucei variant surface glycoprotein. J Biol Chem 259:3011–3015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Almeida ML, Turner MJ, Stambuk BB, Schenkman S. 1988. Identification of an acid-lipase in human serum which is capable of solubilizing glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 150:476–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(88)90545-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agabian N. 1990. Trans splicing of nuclear pre-mRNAs. Cell 61:1157–1160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90674-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridgen PJ, Cross GA, Bridgen J. 1976. N-terminal amino acid sequences of variant-specific surface antigens from Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 263:613–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/263613a0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson PJ, Kooter JM, Borst P. 1987. Inactivation of transcription by UV irradiation of T. brucei provides evidence for a multicistronic transcription unit including a VSG gene. Cell 51:273–281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90154-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder AA, Cross GA. 1981. Glycopeptides from variant surface glycoproteins of Trypanosoma brucei. C-terminal location of antigenically cross-reacting carbohydrate moieties. Mol Biochem Parasitol 2:135–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benne R, Van den Burg J, Brakenhoff JP, Sloof P, Van Boom JH, Tromp MC. 1986. Major transcript of the frameshifted coxII gene from trypanosome mitochondria contains four nucleotides that are not encoded in the DNA. Cell 46:819–826. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(86)90063-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JM, Feagin JE, Stuart K, Simpson L. 1988. Editing of kinetoplastid mitochondrial mRNAs by uridine addition and deletion generates conserved amino acid sequences and AUG initiation codons. Cell 53:401–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90160-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feagin JE, Jasmer DP, Stuart K. 1987. Developmentally regulated addition of nucleotides within apocytochrome b transcripts in Trypanosoma brucei. Cell 49:337–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90286-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shapiro TA, Englund PT. 1995. The structure and replication of kinetoplast DNA. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:117–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.001001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart K, Feagin JE. 1992. Mitochondrial DNA of kinetoplastids. Int Rev Cytol 141:65–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62063-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart KD, Schnaufer A, Ernst NL, Panigrahi AK. 2005. Complex management: RNA editing in trypanosomes. Trends Biochem Sci 30:97–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goringer HU. 2012. ‘Gestalt,’ composition and function of the Trypanosoma brucei editosome. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:65–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aphasizhev R, Aphasizheva I. 2011. Uridine insertion/deletion editing in trypanosomes: a playground for RNA-guided information transfer. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2:669–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrna.82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priest JW, Hajduk SL. 1994. Developmental regulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei. J Bioenerg Biomembr 26:179–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00763067.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider A. 2001. Unique aspects of mitochondrial biogenesis in trypanosomatids. Int J Parasitol 31:1403–1415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(01)00296-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koslowsky DJ, Riley GR, Feagin JE, Stuart K. 1992. Guide RNAs for transcripts with developmentally regulated RNA editing are present in both life cycle stages of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Cell Biol 12:2043–2049.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley GR, Myler PJ, Stuart K. 1995. Quantitation of RNA editing substrates, products and potential intermediates: implications for developmental regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 23:708–712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.4.708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Gygi SP, Ernst NL, Igo RP, Jr, Palazzo SS, Schnaufer A, Weston DS, Carmean N, Salavati R, Aebersold R, Stuart KD. 2001. Association of two novel proteins, TbMP52 and TbMP48, with the Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex. Mol Cell Biol 21:380–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.2.380-389.2001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Schnaufer A, Carmean N, Igo RP, Jr, Gygi SP, Ernst NL, Palazzo SS, Weston DS, Aebersold R, Salavati R, Stuart KD. 2001. Four related proteins of the Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex. Mol Cell Biol 21:6833–6840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.20.6833-6840.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Allen TE, Stuart K, Haynes PA, Gygi SP. 2003. Mass spectrometric analysis of the editosome and other multiprotein complexes in Trypanosoma brucei. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 14:728–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00126-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Schnaufer A, Ernst NL, Wang B, Carmean N, Salavati R, Stuart K. 2003. Identification of novel components of Trypanosoma brucei editosomes. RNA 9:484–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2194603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panigrahi AK, Ernst NL, Domingo GJ, Fleck M, Salavati R, Stuart KD. 2006. Compositionally and functionally distinct editosomes in Trypanosoma brucei. RNA 12:1038–1049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.45506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnes J, Soares CZ, Wickham C, Stuart K. 2011. Endonuclease associations with three distinct editosomes in Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem 286:19320–19330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.228965.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carnes J, Trotter JR, Ernst NL, Steinberg A, Stuart K. 2005. An essential RNase III insertion editing endonuclease in Trypanosoma brucei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16614–16619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506133102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carnes J, Trotter JR, Peltan A, Fleck M, Stuart K. 2008. RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei requires three different editosomes. Mol Cell Biol 28:122–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01374-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotter JR, Ernst NL, Carnes J, Panicucci B, Stuart K. 2005. A deletion site editing endonuclease in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Cell 20:403–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lerch M, Carnes J, Acestor N, Guo X, Schnaufer A, Stuart K. 2012. Editosome accessory factors KREPB9 and KREPB10 in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot Cell 11:832–843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00046-12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ernst NL, Panicucci B, Igo RP, Jr, Panigrahi AK, Salavati R, Stuart K. 2003. TbMP57 is a 3′ terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) of the Trypanosoma brucei editosome. Mol Cell 11:1525–1536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00185-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo X, Carnes J, Ernst NL, Winkler M, Stuart K. 2012. KREPB6, KREPB7, and KREPB8 are important for editing endonuclease function in Trypanosoma brucei. RNA 18:308–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.029314.111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang B, Ernst NL, Palazzo SS, Panigrahi AK, Salavati R, Stuart K. 2003. TbMP44 is essential for RNA editing and structural integrity of the editosome in Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot Cell 2:578–587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.2.3.578-587.2003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott SM, Guo X, Carnes J, Stuart K. 24 August 2015. Differential editosome protein function between life cycle stages of Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.669432.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes J, Schnaufer A, McDermott SM, Domingo G, Proff R, Steinberg AG, Kurtz I, Stuart K. 2012. Mutational analysis of Trypanosoma brucei editosome proteins KREPB4 and KREPB5 reveals domains critical for function. RNA 18:1897–1909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.035048.112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worthey EA, Schnaufer A, Mian IS, Stuart K, Salavati R. 2003. Comparative analysis of editosome proteins in trypanosomatids. Nucleic Acids Res 31:6392–6408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray PN, Busser KJ, Chappell TG. 2007. A novel approach for generating full-length, high coverage allele libraries for the analysis of protein interactions. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:514–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merritt C, Stuart K. 2013. Identification of essential and non-essential protein kinases by a fusion PCR method for efficient production of transgenic Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 190:44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2013.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz B, Iten M, Grether-Buhler Y, Kaminsky R, Brun R. 1997. The Alamar Blue assay to determine drug sensitivity of African trypanosomes (T.b. rhodesiense and T.b. gambiense) in vitro. Acta Trop 68:139–147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(97)00079-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo X, Ernst NL, Stuart KD. 2008. The KREPA3 zinc finger motifs and OB-fold domain are essential for RNA editing and survival of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Cell Biol 28:6939–6953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01115-08.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuart K, Panigrahi AK, Schnaufer A. 2004. Identification and characterization of trypanosome RNA-editing complex components. Methods Mol Biol 265:273–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. 2005. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W244–W248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sali A, Blundell TL. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234:779–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, Kiefer F, Cassarino TG, Bertoni M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. 2014. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W252–W258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone EA, Sidow A. 2005. Physicochemical constraint violation by missense substitutions mediates impairment of protein function and disease severity. Genome Res 15:978–986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.3804205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capra JA, Singh M. 2007. Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics 23:1875–1882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacRae IJ, Doudna JA. 2007. Ribonuclease revisited: structural insights into ribonuclease III family enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 17:138–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson AW. 2014. Ribonuclease III mechanisms of double-stranded RNA cleavage. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5:31–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad C, Schmitt JG, Evguenieva-Hackenberg E, Klug G. 2002. One functional subunit is sufficient for catalytic activity and substrate specificity of Escherichia coli endoribonuclease III artificial heterodimers. FEBS Lett 518:93–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02653-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meng W, Nicholson AW. 2008. Heterodimer-based analysis of subunit and domain contributions to double-stranded RNA processing by Escherichia coli RNase III in vitro. Biochem J 410:39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BJ20071047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Melamed D, Young DL, Gamble CE, Miller CR, Fields S. 2013. Deep mutational scanning of an RRM domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae poly(A)-binding protein. RNA 19:1537–1551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.040709.113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glover L, Horn D. 2009. Site-specific DNA double-strand breaks greatly increase stable transformation efficiency in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 166:194–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.03.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsford S, Turner DJ, Obado SO, Sanchez-Flores A, Glover L, Berriman M, Hertz-Fowler C, Horn D. 2011. High-throughput phenotyping using parallel sequencing of RNA interference targets in the African trypanosome. Genome Res 21:915–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.115089.110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glover L, Alsford S, Baker N, Turner DJ, Sanchez-Flores A, Hutchinson S, Hertz-Fowler C, Berriman M, Horn D. 2015. Genome-scale RNAi screens for high-throughput phenotyping in bloodstream-form African trypanosomes. Nat Protoc 10:106–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsford S, Eckert S, Baker N, Glover L, Sanchez-Flores A, Leung KF, Turner DJ, Field MC, Berriman M, Horn D. 2012. High-throughput decoding of antitrypanosomal drug efficacy and resistance. Nature 482:232–236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreze M, Charloteaux B, Milstein S, Vidalain PO, Yildirim MA, Zhong Q, Svrzikapa N, Romero V, Laloux G, Brasseur R, Vandenhaute J, Boxem M, Cusick ME, Hill DE, Vidal M. 2009. ‘Edgetic’ perturbation of a C. elegans BCL2 ortholog. Nat Methods 6:843–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirumi H, Hirumi K. 1989. Continuous cultivation of Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms in a medium containing a low concentration of serum protein without feeder cell layers. J Parasitol 75:985–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun R, Schoenenberger M. 1979. Cultivation and in vitro cloning of procyclic culture forms of Trypanosoma brucei in a semi-defined medium. Acta Trop 36:289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D. 1983. Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar