The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad6 Postreplication Repair and Siz1/Srs2 Homologous Recombination-Inhibiting Pathways Process DNA Damage That Arises in asf1 Mutants

REFERENCES

• Adkins, M. W., S. R. Howar, and J. K. Tyler. 2004. Chromatin disassembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 is essential for transcriptional activation of the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 genes. Mol. Cell 14:657–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, M. W., and J. K. Tyler. 2004. The histone chaperone Asf1p mediates global chromatin disassembly in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 279:52069–52074.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvaro, D., M. Lisby, and R. Rothstein. 2007. Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet. 3:e228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailly, V., J. Lamb, P. Sung, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1994. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 8:811–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blastyak, A., L. Pinter, I. Unk, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, and L. Haracska. 2007. Yeast Rad5 protein required for postreplication repair has a DNA helicase activity specific for replication fork regression. Mol. Cell 28:167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branzei, D., and M. Foiani. 2007. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 6:994–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., and R. D. Kolodner. 1999. Gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication and recombination defective mutants. Nat. Genet. 23:81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., J. J. Carson, J. Feser, B. Tamburini, S. Zabaronick, J. Linger, and J. K. Tyler. 2008. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134:231–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., M. B. Smolka, and H. Zhou. 2007. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 282:986–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. H., and H. Zhou. 2009. Reconstitution of Rad53 activation by Mec1 through adaptor protein Mrc1. J. Biol. Chem. 284:18593–18604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S. R., K. M. Miller, N. L. Maas, A. Roguev, J. Fillingham, C. S. Chu, M. Schuldiner, M. Gebbia, J. Recht, M. Shales, H. Ding, H. Xu, J. Han, K. Ingvarsdottir, B. Cheng, B. Andrews, C. Boone, S. L. Berger, P. Hieter, Z. Zhang, G. W. Brown, C. J. Ingles, A. Emili, C. D. Allis, D. P. Toczyski, J. S. Weissman, J. F. Greenblatt, and N. J. Krogan. 2007. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446:806–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desany, B. A., A. A. Alcasabas, J. B. Bachant, and S. J. Elledge. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohmen, R. J., K. Madura, B. Bartel, and A. Varshavsky. 1991. The N-end rule is mediated by the UBC2(RAD6) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:7351–7355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, R., A. Hudson, and S. P. Jackson. 2007. Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56. Science 315:649–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emili, A., D. M. Schieltz, J. R. Yates III, and L. H. Hartwell. 2001. Dynamic interaction of DNA damage checkpoint protein Rad53 with chromatin assembly factor Asf1. Mol. Cell 7:13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, A. A., W. M. Lam, P. M. Burgers, and P. D. Kaufman. 2005. Histone deposition protein Asf1 maintains DNA replisome integrity and interacts with replication factor C. Genes Dev. 19:1365–1375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Y., Y. Zhu, K. Zhang, M. Yeung, D. Durocher, and W. Xiao. 2008. Rad6-Rad18 mediates a eukaryotic SOS response by ubiquitinating the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp. Cell 133:601–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Game, J. C., M. S. Williamson, T. Spicakova, and J. M. Brown. 2006. The RAD6/BRE1 histone modification pathway in Saccharomyces confers radiation resistance through a RAD51-dependent process that is independent of RAD18. Genetics 173:1951–1968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannattasio, M., F. Lazzaro, P. Plevani, and M. Muzi-Falconi. 2005. The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J. Biol. Chem. 280:9879–9886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P. E., J. McDonald, R. Woodgate, and C. W. Lawrence. 2005. The relative roles in vivo of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol eta, Pol zeta, Rev1 protein and Pol32 in the bypass and mutation induction of an abasic site, T-T (6-4) photoadduct and T-T cis-syn cyclobutane dimer. Genetics 169:575–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, C. M., and G. Almouzni. 2002. When repair meets chromatin. EMBO Rep. 3:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., H. Zhou, Z. Li, R. M. Xu, and Z. Zhang. 2007. Acetylation of lysine 56 of histone H3 catalyzed by RTT109 and regulated by ASF1 is required for replisome integrity. J. Biol. Chem. 282:28587–28596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeijmakers, J. H. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R. M., and C. M. Pickart. 1999. Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96:645–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, F., A. A. Alcasabas, and S. J. Elledge. 2001. Asf1 links Rad53 to control of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 15:1061–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M. E., and R. D. Kolodner. 2005. A biological network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prevents the deleterious effects of endogenous oxidative DNA damage. Mol. Cell 17:709–720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang, M. E., A. G. Rio, A. Nicolas, and R. D. Kolodner. 2003. A genomewide screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for genes that suppress the accumulation of mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:11529–11534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. W., S. Venkatasubrahmanyam, A. G. Ianculescu, A. Tong, C. Boone, and H. D. Madhani. 2003. A conserved RING finger protein required for histone H2B monoubiquitination and cell size control. Mol. Cell 11:261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kats, E. S., C. P. Albuquerque, H. Zhou, and R. D. Kolodner. 2006. Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:3710–3715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. A., and J. E. Haber. 2009. Chromatin assembly factors Asf1 and CAF-1 have overlapping roles in deactivating the DNA damage checkpoint when DNA repair is complete. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:1151–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, R. 1996. Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 10:1433–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, R. D., C. D. Putnam, and K. Myung. 2002. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297:552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korber, P., S. Barbaric, T. Luckenbach, A. Schmid, U. J. Schermer, D. Blaschke, and W. Horz. 2006. The histone chaperone Asf1 increases the rate of histone eviction at the yeast PHO5 and PHO8 promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 281:5539–5545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., A. Watson, D. M. Sheedy, B. Martin, and A. M. Carr. 2005. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121:689–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, C. W. 2002. Cellular roles of DNA polymerase zeta and Rev1 protein. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 1:425–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyola, A., and G. Almouzni. 2004. Histone chaperones, a supporting role in the limelight. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1677:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masumoto, H., D. Hawke, R. Kobayashi, and A. Verreault. 2005. A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response. Nature 436:294–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motegi, A., K. Kuntz, A. Majeed, S. Smith, and K. Myung. 2006. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:1424–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motegi, A., R. Sood, H. Moinova, S. D. Markowitz, P. P. Liu, and K. Myung. 2006. Human SHPRH suppresses genomic instability through proliferating cell nuclear antigen polyubiquitination. J. Cell Biol. 175:703–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, K., C. Chen, and R. D. Kolodner. 2001. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411:1073–1076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myung, K., A. Datta, C. Chen, and R. D. Kolodner. 2001. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat. Genet. 27:113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, K., A. Datta, and R. D. Kolodner. 2001. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104:397–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myung, K., and R. D. Kolodner. 2003. Induction of genome instability by DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 2:243–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myung, K., and R. D. Kolodner. 2002. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4500–4507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myung, K., V. Pennaneach, E. S. Kats, and R. D. Kolodner. 2003. Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:6640–6645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, K., S. Smith, and R. D. Kolodner. 2004. Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:15980–15985.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng, H. H., S. Dole, and K. Struhl. 2003. The Rtf1 component of the Paf1 transcriptional elongation complex is required for ubiquitination of histone H2B. J. Biol. Chem. 278:33625–33628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, H. H., R. M. Xu, Y. Zhang, and K. Struhl. 2002. Ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6 is required for efficient Dot1-mediated methylation of histone H3 lysine 79. J. Biol. Chem. 277:34655–34657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papouli, E., S. Chen, A. A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, and H. D. Ulrich. 2005. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19:123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennaneach, V., and R. D. Kolodner. 2004. Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast. Nat. Genet. 36:612–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pfander, B., G. L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, C. D., V. Pennaneach, and R. D. Kolodner. 2004. Chromosome healing through terminal deletions generated by de novo telomere additions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:13262–13267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramey, C. J., S. Howar, M. Adkins, J. Linger, J. Spicer, and J. K. Tyler. 2004. Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast lacking the histone chaperone anti-silencing function 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10313–10327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiestl, R. H., S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1990. The SRS2 suppressor of rad6 mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acts by channeling DNA lesions into the RAD52 DNA repair pathway. Genetics 124:817–831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt, K. H., and R. D. Kolodner. 2006. Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:18196–18201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulz, L. L., and J. K. Tyler. 2006. The histone chaperone ASF1 localizes to active DNA replication forks to mediate efficient DNA replication. FASEB J. 20:488–490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S., A. Gupta, R. D. Kolodner, and K. Myung. 2005. Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by the multiple functions of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 4:606–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S., J. Y. Hwang, S. Banerjee, A. Majeed, A. Gupta, and K. Myung. 2004. Mutator genes for suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements identified by a genome-wide screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:9039–9044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, S., and J. F. Diffley. 2002. Deregulated G1-cyclin expression induces genomic instability by preventing efficient pre-RC formation. Genes Dev. 16:2639–2649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubota, T., C. E. Berndsen, J. A. Erkmann, C. L. Smith, L. Yang, M. A. Freitas, J. M. Denu, and P. D. Kaufman. 2007. Histone H3-K56 acetylation is catalyzed by histone chaperone-dependent complexes. Mol. Cell 25:703–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, J. K., C. R. Adams, S. R. Chen, R. Kobayashi, R. T. Kamakaka, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1999. The RCAF complex mediates chromatin assembly during DNA replication and repair. Nature 402:555–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, J. K., K. A. Collins, J. Prasad-Sinha, E. Amiott, M. Bulger, P. J. Harte, R. Kobayashi, and J. T. Kadonaga. 2001. Interaction between the Drosophila CAF-1 and ASF1 chromatin assembly factors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:6574–6584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, H. D. 2005. The RAD6 pathway: control of DNA damage bypass and mutagenesis by ubiquitin and SUMO. Chembiochem 6:1735–1743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich, H. D., and S. Jentsch. 2000. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19:3388–3397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitaliano-Prunier, A., A. Menant, M. Hobeika, V. Geli, C. Gwizdek, and C. Dargemont. 2008. Ubiquitylation of the COMPASS component Swd2 links H2B ubiquitylation to H3K4 trimethylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:1365–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, F. Z. 2006. Sumoylation of PCNA: wrestling with recombination at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 5:399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A., N. J. Krogan, J. Dover, J. Schneider, J. Heidt, M. A. Boateng, K. Dean, A. Golshani, Y. Zhang, J. F. Greenblatt, M. Johnston, and A. Shilatifard. 2003. Bre1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase required for recruitment and substrate selection of Rad6 at a promoter. Mol. Cell 11:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki, R., A. Javaheri, S. Allard, F. Sha, J. Cote, and S. J. Kron. 2005. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:8430–8443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., J. J. Ryan, and H. Zhou. 2004. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J. Biol. Chem. 279:32262–32268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar