Coordination of RNA Polymerase II Pausing and 3′ End Processing Factor Recruitment with Alternative Polyadenylation

REFERENCES

• Chan SL, Huppertz I, Yao C, Weng L, Moresco JJ, Yates JR III, Ule J, Manley JL, Shi Y. 2014. CPSF30 and Wdr33 directly bind to AAUAAA in mammalian mRNA 3′ processing. Genes Dev 28:2370–2380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.250993.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel CR, Bai Y, Tong L. 2008. Protein factors in pre-mRNA 3′-end processing. Cell Mol Life Sci 65:1099–1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7474-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönemann L, Kühn U, Martin G, Schäfer P, Gruber AR, Keller W, Zavolan M, Wahle E. 2014. Reconstitution of CPSF active in polyadenylation: recognition of the polyadenylation signal by WDR33. Genes Dev 28:2381–2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.250985.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehner JN, Pearson EL, Moore C. 2011. Unravelling the means to an end: RNA polymerase II transcription termination. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:283–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard P, Manley JL. 2009. Transcription termination by nuclear RNA polymerases. Genes Dev 23:1247–1269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1792809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose Y, Manley JL. 1998. RNA polymerase II is an essential mRNA polyadenylation factor. Nature 395:93–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/25786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken S, Fong N, Yankulov K, Ballantyne S, Pan G, Greenblatt J, Patterson SD, Wickens M, Bentley DL. 1997. The C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II couples mRNA processing to transcription. Nature 385:357–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/385357a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratowski S. 2009. Progression through the RNA polymerase II CTD cycle. Mol Cell 36:541–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidemann M, Hintermair C, Voss K, Eick D. 2013. Dynamic phosphorylation patterns of RNA polymerase II CTD during transcription. Biochim Biophys Acta 1829:55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarnitsky P, Cho EJ, Buratowski S. 2000. Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription. Genes Dev 14:2452–2460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.824700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn SH, Kim M, Buratowski S. 2004. Phosphorylation of serine 2 within the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain couples transcription and 3′ end processing. Mol Cell 13:67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00492-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licatalosi DD, Geiger G, Minet M, Schroeder S, Cilli K, McNeil JB, Bentley DL. 2002. Functional interaction of yeast pre-mRNA 3′ end processing factors with RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 9:1101–1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00518-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni Z, Schwartz BE, Werner J, Suarez JR, Lis JT. 2004. Coordination of transcription, RNA processing, and surveillance by P-TEFb kinase on heat shock genes. Mol Cell 13:55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00526-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anamika K, Gyenis A, Poidevin L, Poch O, Tora L. 2012. RNA polymerase II pausing downstream of core histone genes is different from genes producing polyadenylated transcripts. PLoS One 7:e38769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dye MJ, Gromak N, Proudfoot NJ. 2006. Exon tethering in transcription by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 21:849–859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enriquez-Harris P, Levitt N, Briggs D, Proudfoot NJ. 1991. A pause site for RNA polymerase II is associated with termination of transcription. EMBO J 10:1833–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover-Cutter K, Kim S, Espinosa J, Bentley DL. 2008. RNA polymerase II pauses and associates with pre-mRNA processing factors at both ends of genes. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15:71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromak N, West S, Proudfoot NJ. 2006. Pause sites promote transcriptional termination of mammalian RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol 26:3986–3996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.10.3986-3996.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian Z, Karpikov A, Lian J, Mahajan MC, Hartman S, Gerstein M, Snyder M, Weissman SM. 2008. A genomic analysis of RNA polymerase II modification and chromatin architecture related to 3′ end RNA polyadenylation. Genome Res 18:1224–1237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.075804.107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Muniz L, West S. 2014. 3′ end formation of pre-mRNA and phosphorylation of Ser2 on the RNA polymerase II CTD are reciprocally coupled in human cells. Genes Dev 28:342–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.231274.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Kim H, Fong N, Erickson B, Bentley DL. 2011. Pre-mRNA splicing is a determinant of histone H3K36 methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:13564–13569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109475108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Di Giammartino DC, Nishida K, Manley JL. 2011. Mechanisms and consequences of alternative polyadenylation. Mol Cell 43:853–866. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque M, Ji Z, Zheng D, Luo W, Li W, You B, Park JY, Yehia G, Tian B. 2013. Analysis of alternative cleavage and polyadenylation by 3′ region extraction and deep sequencing. Nat Methods 10:133–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lianoglou S, Garg V, Yang JL, Leslie CS, Mayr C. 2013. Ubiquitously transcribed genes use alternative polyadenylation to achieve tissue-specific expression. Genes Dev 27:2380–2396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.229328.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt FW, Bothwell AL, Knapp M, Siden E, Mather E, Koshland M, Baltimore D. 1980. Synthesis of secreted and membrane-bound immunoglobulin mu heavy chains is directed by mRNAs that differ at their 3′ ends. Cell 20:293–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(80)90615-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Early P, Rogers J, Davis M, Calame K, Bond M, Wall R, Hood L. 1980. Two mRNAs can be produced from a single immunoglobulin mu gene by alternative RNA processing pathways. Cell 20:313–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(80)90617-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagaki Y, Manley JL. 1998. Levels of polyadenylation factor CstF-64 control IgM heavy chain mRNA accumulation and other events associated with B cell differentiation. Mol Cell 2:761–771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80291-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagaki Y, Seipelt RL, Peterson ML, Manley JL. 1996. The polyadenylation factor CstF-64 regulates alternative processing of IgM heavy chain pre-mRNA during B cell differentiation. Cell 87:941–952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)82000-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce SR, Dingle RW, Peterson ML. 2003. B-cell and plasma-cell splicing differences: a potential role in regulated immunoglobulin RNA processing. RNA 9:1264–1273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.5820103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma J, Gunderson SI, Phillips C. 2006. Non-snRNP U1A levels decrease during mammalian B-cell differentiation and release the IgM secretory poly(A) site from repression. RNA 12:122–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.2159506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martincic K, Alkan SA, Cheatle A, Borghesi L, Milcarek C. 2009. Transcription elongation factor ELL2 directs immunoglobulin secretion in plasma cells by stimulating altered RNA processing. Nat Immunol 10:1102–1109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson ML, Perry RP. 1986. Regulated production of mu m and mu s mRNA requires linkage of the poly(A) addition sites and is dependent on the length of the mu s-mu m intron. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:8883–8887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.23.8883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson ML, Perry RP. 1989. The regulated production of mu m and mu s mRNA is dependent on the relative efficiencies of mu s poly(A) site usage and the c mu 4-to-M1 splice. Mol Cell Biol 9:726–738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.9.2.726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson ML, Bertolino S, Davis F. 2002. An RNA polymerase pause site is associated with the immunoglobulin mus poly(A) site. Mol Cell Biol 22:5606–5615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.15.5606-5615.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder SC, Schwer B, Shuman S, Bentley D. 2000. Dynamic association of capping enzymes with transcribing RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev 14:2435–2440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.836300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi A, Hawley RG, Hawley T, Shulman MJ, Traunecker A, Kohler G, Hozumi N. 1983. Functional immunoglobulin M production after transfection of cloned immunoglobulin heavy and light chain genes into lymphoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80:6351–6355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.20.6351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 10:R25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg MG, Singh LN, Younis I, Kaida D, Zhang Z, Wan L, Dreyfuss G. 2012. U1 snRNP determines mRNA length and regulates isoform expression. Cell 150:53–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaida D, Berg MG, Younis I, Kasim M, Singh LN, Wan L, Dreyfuss G. 2010. U1 snRNP protects pre-mRNAs from premature cleavage and polyadenylation. Nature 468:664–668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon GG, Perry RP. 1985. C mu-containing transcripts initiate heterogeneously within the IgH enhancer region and contain a novel 5′-nontranslatable exon. Nature 318:475–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/318475a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson ML, Bingham GL, Cowan C. 2006. Multiple features contribute to the use of the immunoglobulin M secretion-specific poly(A) signal but are not required for developmental regulation. Mol Cell Biol 26:6762–6771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00889-06.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nag A, Narsinh K, Martinson HG. 2007. The poly(A)-dependent transcriptional pause is mediated by CPSF acting on the body of the polymerase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14:662–669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonaha M, Proudfoot NJ. 1999. Specific transcriptional pausing activates polyadenylation in a coupled in vitro system. Mol Cell 3:593–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80352-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips C, Virtanen A. 1997. The murine IgM secretory poly(A) site contains dual upstream and downstream elements which affect polyadenylation. Nucleic Acids Res 25:2344–2351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.12.2344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar