Functional Roles of Acetylated Histone Marks at Mouse Meiotic Recombination Hot Spots

REFERENCES

• Keeney S. 2008. Spo11 and the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genome Dyn Stab 2:81–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/7050_2007_026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellani MA, Romanienko PJ, Cairatti DA, Camerini-Otero RD. 2005. SPO11 is required for sex-body formation, and Spo11 heterozygosity rescues the prophase arrest of Atm−/− spermatocytes. J Cell Sci 118:3233–3245. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahadevaiah SK, Turner JM, Baudat F, Rogakou EP, de Boer P, Blanco-Rodriguez J, Jasin M, Keeney S, Bonner WM, Burgoyne PS. 2001. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat Genet 27:271–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/85830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. 2000. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol Cell 6:975–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Imai Y, de Massy B. 2013. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat Rev Genet 14:794–806. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paigen K, Petkov P. 2010. Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution. Nat Rev Genet 11:221–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F, Eckardt S, Leu NA, McLaughlin KJ, Wang PJ. 2008. Mouse TEX15 is essential for DNA double-strand break repair and chromosomal synapsis during male meiosis. J Cell Biol 180:673–679. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200709057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway JK, Booth J, Edelmann W, McGowan CH, Cohen PE. 2008. MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3-independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet 4:e1000186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker CL, Walker M, Kajita S, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2014. PRDM9 binding organizes hotspot nucleosomes and limits Holliday junction migration. Genome Res 24:724–732. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.170167.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick K, Smagulova F, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2012. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485:642–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey C, Barthes P, Chauveau-Le Friec G, Langa F, Baudat F, De Massy B. 2011. Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specificity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol 9:e1001176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Buard J, Grey C, Fledel-Alon A, Ober C, Przeworski M, Coop G, de Massy B. 2010. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327:836–840. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvanov ED, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2010. Prdm9 controls activation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Science 327:835. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagulova F, Gregoretti IV, Brick K, Khil P, Camerini-Otero RD, Petukhova GV. 2011. Genome-wide analysis reveals novel molecular features of mouse recombination hotspots. Nature 472:375–378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shones DE, Zhao K. 2008. Genome-wide approaches to studying chromatin modifications. Nat Rev Genet 9:179–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Z, Zang C, Rosenfeld JA, Schones DE, Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T-Y, Peng W, Zhang MQ, Zhao K. 2008. Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome. Nat Genet 40:897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youds J, Boulton SJ. 2011. The choice in meiosis—defining the factors that influence crossover or non-crossover formation. J Cell Sci 124:501–513. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.074427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahls WP, Davidson MK. 2010. Discrete DNA sites regulate global distribution of meiotic recombination. Trends Genet 26:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner CR, Kuervers L, Baillie DL, Yanowitz JL. 2010. xnd-1 regulates the global recombination landscape in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 467:839–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirota K, Mizuno K, Shibata T, Ohta K. 2008. Distinct chromatin modulators regulate the formation of accessible and repressive chromatin at the fission yeast recombination hotspot ade6-M26. Mol Biol Cell 19:1162–1173. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-04-0377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada T, Mizuno K, Hirota K, Kon N, Wahls WP, Hartsuiker E, Murofushi H, Shibata T, Ohta K. 2004. Roles of histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling factor in a meiotic recombination hotspot. EMBO J 23:1792–1803. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers NR, Parvanov ED, Baker CL, Walker M, Petkov PM, Paigen K. 2016. The meiotic recombination activator PRDM9 trimethylates both H3K36 and H3K4 at recombination hotspots in vivo. PLoS Genet 12:e1006146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollier J, Lin W, Soustelle C, Suhre K, Nicolas A, Geli V, de La Roche Saint-Andre C. 2004. Set1 is required for meiotic S-phase onset, double-strand break formation and middle gene expression. EMBO J 23:1957–1967. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita K, Shinohara M, Shinohara A. 2004. Rad6-Bre1-mediated histone H2B ubiquitylation modulates the formation of double-strand breaks during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11380–11385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400078101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng HH, Xu RM, Zhang Y, Struhl K. 2002. Ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6 is required for efficient Dot1-mediated methylation of histone H3 lysine 79. J Biol Chem 277:34655–34657. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C200433200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun ZW, Allis D. 2002. Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast. Nature 418:104–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieczkowski PA, Dominska M, Buck MJ, Lieb JD, Petes TD. 2007. Loss of a histone deacetylase dramatically alters the genomic distribution of Spo11p-catalyzed DNA breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:3955–3960. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700412104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murr R, Loizou JI, Yang YG, Cuenin C, Li H, Wang ZQ, Herceg Z. 2006. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 8:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li L, Liang J, Shi L, Yang J, Yi X, Zhang D, Han X, Yu N, Shang Y. 2013. Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes homologous recombination in DNA repair by facilitating histone turnover. J Biol Chem 288:18271–18282. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.473199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin S, Parthun MR. 2006. Recruitment of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p to chromatin is linked to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 26:3649–3658. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.26.9.3649-3658.2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH, Oshige M, Durant ST, Rasila KK, Williamson EA, Ramsey H, Kwan L, Nickoloff JA, Hromas R. 2005. The SET domain protein Metnase mediates foreign DNA integration and links integration to nonhomologous end-joining repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:18075–18080. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503676102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buard J, Barthes P, Grey C, de Massy B. 2009. Distinct histone modifications define initiation and repair of meiotic recombination in the mouse. EMBO J 28:2616–2624. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburini BA, Tyler JK. 2005. Localized histone acetylation and deacetylation triggered by the homologous recombination pathway of double-strand DNA repair. Mol Cell Biol 25:4903–4913. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.12.4903-4913.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getun IV, Wu ZK, Khalil AM, Bois PR. 2010. Nucleosome occupancy landscape and dynamics at mouse recombination hotspots. EMBO Rep 11:555–560. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getun IV, Torres B, Bois PR. 2011. Flow cytometry purification of mouse meiotic cells. J Vis Exp 50:2602. https://doi.org/10.3791/2602.
   Google Scholar
• Fallahi M, Getun IV, Wu ZK, Bois PRJ. 2010. A global expression switch marks pachytene initiation during mouse male meiosis. Genes 1:469–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes1030469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kota SK, Feil R. 2010. Epigenetic transitions in germ cell development and meiosis. Dev Cell 19:675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Dent SY. 2014. Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation. Nat Rev Genet 15:93–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godmann M, Lambort R, Kimmins S. 2009. The dynamic epigenetic program in male germ cells: its role in spermatogenesis, testis cancer, and its response to the environment. Microsc Res Tech 72:603–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan R, Ge Z, Sirbu B, Doughty C, Garcia PA, Schlederer M, Annunziato AT, Cortez D, Kenner L, Parthun MR. 2013. Histone acetyl transferase 1 is essential for mammalian development, genome stability, and the processing of newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. PLoS Genet 9:e1003518. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi S, Yoshida K, Matsui Y. 2005. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature 438:374–378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinant C, Houtsmuller AB, Vermeulen W. 2008. Chromatin structure and DNA damage repair. Epigenetics Chromatin 1:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-1-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang J, Cho NW, Cui G, Manion EM, Shanbhag NM, Botuyan MV, Mer G, Greenberg RA. 2013. Acetylation limits 53BP1 association with damaged chromatin to promote homologous recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:317–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto Y, Kato J, Ikeda H. 1997. Silencing factors participate in DNA repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 388:900–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/42288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb S, Esposito RE. 1989. A new role for a yeast transcriptional silencer gene, SIR2, in regulation of recombination in ribosomal DNA. Cell 56:771–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90681-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San-Segundo PA, Roeder GS. 1999. Pch2 links chromatin silencing to meiotic checkpoint control. Cell 97:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80741-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getun IV, Wu ZK, Bois PRJ. 2012. Organization and roles of nucleosomes at mouse meiotic recombination hotspots. Nucleus 3:244–250. https://doi.org/10.4161/nucl.20325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bois PR. 2007. A highly polymorphic meiotic recombination mouse hotspot exhibits incomplete repair. Mol Cell Biol 27:7053–7062. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00874-07.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu ZK, Getun IV, Bois PR. 2010. Anatomy of mouse recombination hot spots. Nucleic Acids Res 38:2346–2354. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon H, Baudat F, Grey C, Liskay RM, de Massy B. 2005. Crossover and noncrossover pathways in mouse meiosis. Mol Cell 20:563–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.09.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steger DJ, Lefterova MI, Ying L, Stonestorm AJ, Schupp M, Zhuo D, Vakoc AL, Kim JE, Chen J, Lazar MA, Biobel GA, Vakoc CR. 2008. DOT1L/KMT4 recruitment and H3K79 methylation are ubiquitously coupled with gene transcription in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 28:2825–2839. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02076-07.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh TY, Schones DE, Wang Z, Wei G, Chepelev I, Zhao K. 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129:823–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karachentsev D, Sarma K, Reinberg D, Steward R. 2005. PR-Set7-dependent methylation of histone H4 Lys 20 functions in repression of gene expression and is essential for mitosis. Genes Dev 19:431–435. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1263005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squazzo SL, O'Geen H, Komashko VM, Krig SR, Jin VX, Jang SW, Margueron R, Reinberg D, Green R, Farnham PJ. 2006. Suz12 binds to silenced regions of the genome in a cell-type-specific manner. Genome Res 16:890–900. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.5306606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole F, Kauppi L, Lange J, Roig I, Wang R, Keeney S, Jasin M. 2012. Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 14:424–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi L, Jasin M, Keeney S. 2013. How much is enough? Control of DNA double-strand break numbers in mouse meiosis. Cell Cycle 12:2719–2720. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.26079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnova NA, Romanienko PJ, Khil PP, Camerini-Otero RD. 2006. Gene expression profiles of Spo11−/− mouse testes with spermatocytes arrested in meiotic prophase I. Reproduction 132:67–77. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. 2000. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell 6:989–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00098-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugel S, Mostoslavsky R. 2014. Chromatin and beyond: the multitasking roles for SIRT6. Trends Biochem Sci 39:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2013.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Petukhov PA, Jung M, Velena A, Eliseeva E, Dritschillo A, Kozikowski AP. 2005. Chemistry and biology of mercaptoacetamides as novel histone deacetylase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 15:1389–1392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konsoula Z, Cao H, Velena A, Jung M. 2009. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and antitumor activity of mercaptoacetamide-based histone deacetylase inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 8:2844–2851. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konsoula R, Jung M. 2008. In vitro plasma stability, permeability and solubility of mercaptoacetamide histone deacetylase inhibitors. Int J Pharm 361:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costi R, Di Santo R, Artico M, Miele G, Valentini P, Novellino E, Cereseto A. 2007. Cinnamoyl compounds as simple molecules that inhibit p300 histone acetyltransferase. J Med Chem 50:1973–1977. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm060943s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Braiteh FS, Kurzrock R. 2005. Liposome-encapsulated curcumin: in vitro and in vivo effects on proliferation, apoptosis, signaling, and angiogenesis. Cancer 104:1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters AH, O'Carroll D, Scherthan H, Mechtler K, Sauer S, Schöfer C, Weipoltshammer K, Pagani M, Lachner M, Kohlmaier A, Opravil S, Doyle M, Sibilia M, Jenuwein T. 2001. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107:323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00542-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotta G, Sengupta R, Kubicek S, Malin S, Kauer M, Callén E, Celeste A, Pagani M, Opravil S, Rosa-Velazquez IA, Espejo A, Bedford MT, Nussenzweig A, Busslinger M, Jenuwein T. 2008. A chromatin-wide transition to H4K20 monomethylation impairs genome integrity and programmed DNA rearrangements in the mouse. Genes Dev 22:2048–2061. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.476008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu BD, Hess JL, Horning SE, Brown GA, Korsmeyer SJ. 1995. Altered Hox expression and segmental identity in Mll-mutant mice. Nature 378:505–508. https://doi.org/10.1038/378505a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayton P, Sneddon SF, Palmer DB, Rosewell IR, Owen MJ, Young B, Presley R, Subramanian V. 2001. Truncation of the Mll gene in exon 5 by gene targeting leads to early preimplantation lethality of homozygous embryos. Genesis 30:201–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/gene.1066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell EL, Nagamori I, Williams EO, Del Rosario AM, Bryson BD, Watson N, White FM, Sassoni-Corsi P, Guarente L. 2014. SirT1 is required in the male germ cell for differentiation and fecundity in mice. Development 141:3495–3504. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.110627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toiber D, Erdel F, Bouzoune K, Silberman DM, Zhong L, Mulligan P, Sebastian C, Cosentino C, Martinez-Pastor B, Giacosa S, D'Urso A, Näär AM, Kingston R, Rippe K, Mostoslavsky R. 2013. SIRT6 recruits SNF2H to DNA break sites, preventing genomic instability through chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 51:454–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesch BJ, Dokshin GA, Young RA, McCarrey JR, Page DC. 2013. A set of genes critical to development is epigenetically poised in mouse germ cells from fetal stages through completion of meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:16061–16066. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315204110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesch BJ, Page DC. 2014. Poised chromatin in the mammalian germ line. Development 141:3619–3626. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.113027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ye J, Ai X, Eugeni EE, Zhang L, Carpenter LR, Jelinek MA, Freitas MA, Parthun MR. 2005. Histone H4 lysine 91 acetylation a core domain modification associated with chromatin assembly. Mol Cell 18:123–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.02.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkova A, Klein F, Leung W-Y, Haber JE. 2000. HO endonuclease-induced recombination in yeast meiosis resembles Spo11-induced events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:14500–14505. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders SL, Portoso M, Mata J, Bähler J, Allshire RC, Kouzarides T. 2004. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119:603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajdu I, Ciccia A, Lewis SM, Elledge SJ. 2011. Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome candidate 1 is involved in the cellular response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:13130–13134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110081108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeson NT, Sengupta R, Arida AR, Jenuwein T, Sanders SL. 2008. Di-methyl H4 lysine 20 targets the checkpoint protein Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. J Biol Chem 283:33168–33174. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806857200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wakeman TP, Wang Q, Feng J, Wang XF. 2012. Bat3 facilitates H3K79 dimethylation by DOT1L and promotes DNA damage-induced 53BP1 foci at G1/G2 cell-cycle phases. EMBO J 31:2169–2181. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei H, Zhang L, Luo K, Qin Y, Chesi M, Fei F, Bergsagel PL, Wang L, You Z, Lou Z. 2011. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature 470:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Yi SV. 2014. Specific modifications of histone tails, but not DNA methylation, mirror the temporal variation of mammalian recombination hotspots. Genome Biol Evol 6:2918–2929. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evu230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, Fry B, Meissner A, Wernig M, Plath K, Jaenisch R, Wagschal A, Feil R, Schreiber SL, Lander ES. 2006. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125:315–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs M, Onodera C, Blaschke K, Ebata KT, Song JS, Ramalho-Santos M. 2013. Bivalent chromatin marks developmental regulatory genes in the mouse embryonic germline in vivo. Cell Rep 3:1777–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shogren-Knaak M, Ishi H, Sun JM, Pazin MJ, Davie JR, Peterson CL. 2006. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311:844–847. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang YA, Wen WL, Chang JW, Wei TT, Tan YH, Salunke S, Chen CT, Chen CS, Wang YC. 2010. A novel histone deacetylase inhibitor exhibits antitumor activity via apoptosis induction, F-actin disruption and gene acetylation in lung cancer. PLoS One 5: e12417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012417.
   Google Scholar
• Perrella G, Consiglio MF, Aiese-Cigliano R, Cremona G, Sanchez-Moran E, Barra L, Errico A, Bressan RA, Franklin FC, Conicella C. 2010. Histone hyperacetylation affects meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Arabidopsis. Plant J 62:796–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04191.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merker JD, Dominska M, Greenwell PW, Rinella E, Bouck DC, Shibata Y, Strahl BD, Mieczkowski P, Petes TD. 2008. The histone methylase Set2p and the histone deacetylase Rpd3p repress meiotic recombination at the HIS4 meiotic recombination hotspot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 7:1298–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.04.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yelina NE, Choi K, Chelysheva L, Macaulay M, de Snoo B, Wijnker E, Miller N, Drouaud J, Grelon M, Copenhaver GP, Mezard C, Kelly KA, Henderson IR. 2012. Epigenetic remodeling of meiotic crossover frequency in Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase mutants. PLoS Genet 8:e1002844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002844.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki H, Matsui Y. 2008. Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 9:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felici M. 2011. Nuclear reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells: epigenetic contribution. Stem Cells Int 2011:425863. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/425863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okada Y, Scott G, Ray MK, Mishina Y, Zhang Y. 2007. Histone demethylase JHDM2A is critical for Tnp1 and Prm1 transcription and spermatogenesis. Nature 450:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart A. 2001. Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ 323:391–393. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi L, May CA, Jeffreys AJ. 2009. Analysis of meiotic recombination products from human sperm. Methods Mol Biol 557:323–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-527-5_20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang D, Veena MS, Stevenson K, Tang C, Ho B, Suh JD, Duarte VM, Faull KF, Mehta K, Srivatsan ES, Wang MB. 2008. Liposome-encapsulated curcumin suppresses growth of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and in xenografts through the inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB by an AKT-independent pathway. Clin Cancer Res 14:6228–6236. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrova YE, Plumb M, Brown J, Fennelly J, Bois P, Goodhead D, Jeffreys AJ. 1998. Stage specificity, dose response, and doubling dose for mouse minisatellite germ-line mutation induced by acute radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:6251–6255. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.11.6251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle AG. 1974. Mutation induction in mice. Adv Radiat Biol 4:131–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-035404-7.50010-3.
   Google Scholar
• Hess RA, Renato de Franca L. 2008. Spermatogenesis and cycle of the seminiferous epithelium. Adv Exp Med Biol 636:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09597-4_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy EM. 2002. Male germ cell gene expression. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:103–128. https://doi.org/10.1210/rp.57.1.103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• França LR, Avelar GF, Almeida FF. 2005. Spermatogenesis and sperm transit through the epididymis in mammals with emphasis on pigs. Theriogenology 63:300–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale KP, Baumann M, Eberharter A, Mamais A, Becker PB, Boyes J. 2007. Acetylation increases access of remodelling complexes to their nucleosome targets to enhance initiation of V(D)J recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 35:6311–6321. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm650.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wysocka J, Swigut T, Xiao H, Milne TA, Kwon SY, Landry J, Kauer M, Tackett AJ, Chait BT, Badenhorst P, Wu C, Allis D. 2006. A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling. Nature 442:86–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar