From Hypothesis to Mechanism: Uncovering Nuclear Pore Complex Links to Gene Expression

REFERENCES

• Blobel G. 1985. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:8527–8529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.24.8527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirbel RM, Mathieu UR, Kurz A, Cremer T, Lichter P. 1993. Evidence for a nuclear compartment of transcription and splicing located at chromosome domain boundaries. Chromosome Res. 1:93–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00710032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cremer T, Kurz A, Zirbel R, Dietzel S, Rinke B, Schrock E, Speicher MR, Mathieu U, Jauch A, Emmerich P, Scherthan H, Ried T, Cremer C, Lichter P. 1993. Role of chromosome territories in the functional compartmentalization of the cell nucleus. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 58:777–792. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/SQB.1993.058.01.085.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aitchison JD, Rout MP. 2012. The yeast nuclear pore complex and transport through it. Genetics 190:855–883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.127803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg MW, Allen TD. 1992. High resolution scanning electron microscopy of the nuclear envelope: demonstration of a new, regular, fibrous lattice attached to the baskets of the nucleoplasmic face of the nuclear pores. J. Cell Biol. 119:1429–1440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.119.6.1429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rout MP, Aitchison JD, Suprapto A, Hjertaas K, Zhao Y, Chait BT. 2000. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148:635–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.148.4.635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, Sali A, Rout MP. 2007. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450:695–701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilokapic S, Schwartz TU. 2012. 3D ultrastructure of the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24:86–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandez-Martinez J, Rout MP. 2012. A jumbo problem: mapping the structure and functions of the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24:92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2011.12.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothballer A, Kutay U. 2012. SnapShot: the nuclear envelope II. Cell 150:1084–1084.e1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabut G, Doye V, Ellenberg J. 2004. Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1114–1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilworth DJ, Suprapto A, Padovan JC, Chait BT, Wozniak RW, Rout MP, Aitchison JD. 2001. Nup2p dynamically associates with the distal regions of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 153:1465–1478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.153.7.1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler A, Hurt E. 2007. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:761–773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natalizio BJ, Wente SR. 2013. Postage for the messenger: designating routes for nuclear mRNA export. Trends Cell Biol. 23:365–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2013.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Navarro S, Hurt E. 2011. Linking gene regulation to mRNA production and export. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23:302–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babour A, Dargemont C, Stutz F. 2012. Ubiquitin and assembly of export competent mRNP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819:521–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.12.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller-McNicoll M, Neugebauer KM. 2013. How cells get the message: dynamic assembly and function of mRNA-protein complexes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:275–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutucci E, Stutz F. 2011. Keeping mRNPs in check during assembly and nuclear export. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:377–384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Jensen TH. 2013. Transcription-associated quality control of mRNP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829:158–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.08.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkmann AW, Noble KN, Cole CN, Wente SR. 2011. Dbp5, Gle1-IP6 and Nup159: a working model for mRNP export. Nucleus 2:540–548. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/nucl.2.6.17881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkov E, Dean JC, Jani D, Kuhlmann SI, Stewart M. 2012. Structural basis for the assembly and disassembly of mRNA nuclear export complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819:578–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.02.017.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nino CA, Herissant L, Babour A, Dargemont C. 2013. mRNA nuclear export in yeast. Chem. Rev. 113:8523–8545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400002g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilworth DJ, Tackett AJ, Rogers RS, Yi EC, Christmas RH, Smith JJ, Siegel AF, Chait BT, Wozniak RW, Aitchison JD. 2005. The mobile nucleoporin Nup2p and chromatin-bound Prp20p function in endogenous NPC-mediated transcriptional control. J. Cell Biol. 171:955–965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200509061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii K, Arib G, Lin C, Van Houwe G, Laemmli UK. 2002. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 109:551–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00756-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee PC, Widom J, Brickner JH. 2007. H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol. 5:e81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser SM. 2006. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 441:774–778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner JH, Walter P. 2004. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol. 2:e342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Zimmer C, Gadal O, Lesne A, Buc H, Feuerbach-Fournier F, Olivo-Marin JC, Hurt EC, Nehrbass U. 2006. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441:770–773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F. 2006. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:7858–7870. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00870-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. 2004. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117:427–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00448-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid M, Arib G, Laemmli C, Nishikawa J, Durussel T, Laemmli UK. 2006. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol. Cell 21:379–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra R, Kerr SC, Harreman MT, Apponi LH, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, Chaurasia S, Valentini SR, Corbett AH. 2007. Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J. Biol. Chem. 282:3042–3049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608741200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abruzzi KC, Belostotsky DA, Chekanova JA, Dower K, Rosbash M. 2006. 3′-end formation signals modulate the association of genes with the nuclear periphery as well as mRNP dot formation. EMBO J. 25:4253–4262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarma NJ, Haley TM, Barbara KE, Buford TD, Willis KA, Santangelo GM. 2007. Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics 175:1127–1135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Brickner DG, Light WH, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter AB, Volpe T, Brickner JH. 2010. DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:111–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Ahmed S, Meldi L, Thompson A, Light W, Young M, Hickman TL, Chu F, Fabre E, Brickner JH. 2012. Transcription factor binding to a DNA zip code controls interchromosomal clustering at the nuclear periphery. Dev. Cell 22:1234–1246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.03.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burns LT, Wente SR. 2012. Nuclear GPS for interchromosomal clustering. Dev. Cell 22:1119–1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.05.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seo HS, Blus BJ, Jankovic NZ, Blobel G. 2013. Structure and nucleic acid binding activity of the nucleoporin Nup157. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:16450–16455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316607110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball JR, Dimaano C, Bilak A, Kurchan E, Zundel MT, Ullman KS. 2007. Sequence preference in RNA recognition by the nucleoporin Nup153. J. Biol. Chem. 282:8734–8740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608477200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light WH, Brickner DG, Brand VR, Brickner JH. 2010. Interaction of a DNA zip code with the nuclear pore complex promotes H2A.Z incorporation and INO1 transcriptional memory. Mol. Cell 40:112–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brickner DG, Brickner JH. 2010. Cdk phosphorylation of a nucleoporin controls localization of active genes through the cell cycle. Mol. Biol. Cell 21:3421–3432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-01-0065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim O, Misteli T. 2012. SnapShot: chromosome confirmation capture. Cell 148:1068.e1-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van de Vosse DW, Wan Y, Lapetina DL, Chen WM, Chiang JH, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW. 2013. A role for the nucleoporin Nup170p in chromatin structure and gene silencing. Cell 152:969–983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubarry M, Loiodice I, Chen CL, Thermes C, Taddei A. 2011. Tight protein-DNA interactions favor gene silencing. Genes Dev. 25:1365–1370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.611011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister P, Towbin BD, Pike BL, Ponti A, Gasser SM. 2010. The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev. 24:766–782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.559610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattout A, Pike BL, Towbin BD, Bank EM, Gonzalez-Sandoval A, Stadler MB, Meister P, Gruenbaum Y, Gasser SM. 2011. An EDMD mutation in C. elegans lamin blocks muscle-specific gene relocation and compromises muscle integrity. Curr. Biol. 21:1603–1614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towbin BD, Gonzalez-Aguilera C, Sack R, Gaidatzis D, Kalck V, Meister P, Askjaer P, Gasser SM. 2012. Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell 150:934–947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohner S, Kalck V, Wang X, Ikegami K, Lieb JD, Gasser SM, Meister P. 2013. Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 200:589–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaquerizas JM, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe NM, Akhtar A. 2010. Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000846. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma VV, Fornerod M. 2010. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140:360–371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer MW. 2010. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 140:372–383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence JB, Singer RH, Marselle LM. 1989. Highly localized tracks of specific transcripts within interphase nuclei visualized by in situ hybridization. Cell 57:493–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90924-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Spector DL. 1991. Nascent pre-mRNA transcripts are associated with nuclear regions enriched in splicing factors. Genes Dev. 5:2288–2302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.5.12a.2288.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vargas DY, Raj A, Marras SA, Kramer FR, Tyagi S. 2005. Mechanism of mRNA transport in the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102:17008–17013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505580102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor A, Suliman S, Ben-Yishay R, Yunger S, Brody Y, Shav-Tal Y. 2010. Dynamics of single mRNP nucleocytoplasmic transport and export through the nuclear pore in living cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 12:543–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Angelo MA, Gomez-Cavazos JS, Mei A, Lackner DH, Hetzer MW. 2012. A change in nuclear pore complex composition regulates cell differentiation. Dev. Cell 22:446–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RR, Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Dvorkina M, Jorgensen H, Roix J, McQueen P, Misteli T, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. 2006. Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J. Cell Sci. 119:132–140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ragoczy T, Bender MA, Telling A, Byron R, Groudine M. 2006. The locus control region is required for association of the murine beta-globin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev. 20:1447–1457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1419506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takizawa T, Gudla PR, Guo L, Lockett S, Misteli T. 2008. Allele-specific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP. Genes Dev. 22:489–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1634608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yao J, Fetter RD, Hu P, Betzig E, Tjian R. 2011. Subnuclear segregation of genes and core promoter factors in myogenesis. Genes Dev. 25:569–580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang Y, Franks TM, Marchetto MC, Gage FH, Hetzer MW. 2013. Dynamic association of NUP98 with the human genome. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chatel G, Desai SH, Mattheyses AL, Powers MA, Fahrenkrog B. 2012. Domain topology of nucleoporin Nup98 within the nuclear pore complex. J. Struct. Biol. 177:81–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2011.11.004.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singer S, Zhao R, Barsotti AM, Ouwehand A, Fazollahi M, Coutavas E, Breuhahn K, Neumann O, Longerich T, Pusterla T, Powers MA, Giles KM, Leedman PJ, Hess J, Grunwald D, Bussemaker HJ, Singer RH, Schirmacher P, Prives C. 2012. Nuclear pore component Nup98 is a potential tumor suppressor and regulates posttranscriptional expression of select p53 target genes. Mol. Cell 48:799–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffis ER, Altan N, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Powers MA. 2002. Nup98 is a mobile nucleoporin with transcription-dependent dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell 13:1282–1297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-11-0538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light WH, Freaney J, Sood V, Thompson A, D'Urso A, Horvath CM, Brickner JH. 2013. A conserved role for human Nup98 in altering chromatin structure and promoting epigenetic transcriptional memory. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krull S, Dorries J, Boysen B, Reidenbach S, Magnius L, Norder H, Thyberg J, Cordes VC. 2010. Protein Tpr is required for establishing nuclear pore-associated zones of heterochromatin exclusion. EMBO J. 29:1659–1673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyanari Y, Ziegler-Birling C, Torres-Padilla ME. 2013. Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20:1321–1324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickmore WA, van Steensel B. 2013. Genome architecture: domain organization of interphase chromosomes. Cell 152:1270–1284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Gilbert LA, Cimini BA, Schnitzbauer J, Zhang W, Li GW, Park J, Blackburn EH, Weissman JS, Qi LS, Huang B. 2013. Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell 155:1479–1491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper AK. 2013. Transfer RNA post-transcriptional processing, turnover, and subcellular dynamics in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 194:43–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.147470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Wu CY, Blobel G. 2004. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J. Cell Biol. 167:605–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200405168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra P, Iglesias N, Camblong J, Zenklusen D, Stutz F. 2005. Perinuclear Mlp proteins downregulate gene expression in response to a defect in mRNA export. EMBO J. 24:813–823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon-Ramos DA, Salisbury JL, Sanders MA, Shenoy SM, Singer RH, Garcia-Blanco MA. 2003. Asymmetric distribution of nuclear pore complexes and the cytoplasmic localization of beta2-tubulin mRNA in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Dev. Cell 4:941–952. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00163-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Powrie EA, Zenklusen D, Singer RH. 2011. A nucleoporin, Nup60p, affects the nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of ASH1 mRNA in S. cerevisiae. RNA 17:134–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1261/rna.1210411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar