SWI/SNF Binding to the HO Promoter Requires Histone Acetylation and Stimulates TATA-Binding Protein Recruitment

REFERENCES

• Abrams, E., L. Neigeborn, and M. Carlson. 1986. Molecular analysis of SNF2 and SNF5, genes required for expression of glucose-repressible genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3643–3651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agalioti, T., S. Lomvardas, B. Parekh, J. Yie, T. Maniatis, and D. Thanos. 2000. Ordered recruitment of chromatin modifying and general transcription factors to the IFN-β promoter. Cell 103:667–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrau, J. C., C. J. Van Oevelen, H. A. Van Teeffelen, P. A. Weil, F. C. Holstege, and H. T. Timmers. 2002. Mot1p is essential for TBP recruitment to selected promoters during in vivo gene activation. EMBO J. 21:5173–5183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. Ricupero-Hovasse, and F. Winston. 1995. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 14:1490–1497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., C. R. Wobbe, S. Ricupero-Hovasse, K. Struhl, and F. Winston. 1994. Equivalent mutations in the two repeats of yeast TATA-binding protein confer distinct TATA recognition specificities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3719–3728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auble, D. T., K. E. Hansen, C. G. Mueller, W. S. Lane, J. Thorner, and S. Hahn. 1994. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 8:1920–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., G. M. Perez, J. M. Beechem, and P. A. Weil. 1997. Structure-function analysis of TAF130: identification and characterization of a high-affinity TATA-binding protein interaction domain in the N terminus of yeast TAF(II)130. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3081–3093.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbaric, S., H. Reinke, and W. Horz. 2003. Multiple mechanistically distinct functions of SAGA at the PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3468–3476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belotserkovskaya, R., D. E. Sterner, M. Deng, M. H. Sayre, P. M. Lieberman, and S. L. Berger. 2000. Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:634–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2002. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7365–7371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhoite, L. T., and D. J. Stillman. 1998. Residues in the Swi5 zinc finger protein that mediate cooperative DNA binding with the Pho2 homeodomain protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:6436–6446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhoite, L. T., Y. Yu, and D. J. Stillman. 2001. The Swi5 activator recruits the Mediator complex to the HO promoter without RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 15:2457–2469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, D., A. N. Imbalzano, P. Eriksson, Y. Yu, and D. J. Stillman. 2004. Role for Nhp6, Gcn5, and the Swi/Snf complex in stimulating formation of the TATA-binding protein-TFIIA-DNA complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8312–8321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bobola, N., R. P. Jansen, T. H. Shin, and K. Nasmyth. 1996. Asymmetric accumulation of Ash1p in postanaphase nuclei depends on a myosin and restricts yeast mating-type switching to mother cells. Cell 84:699–709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botstein, D., S. C. Falco, S. E. Stewart, M. Brennan, S. Scherer, D. T. Stinchcomb, K. Struhl, and R. W. Davis. 1979. Sterile host yeasts (SHY): a eukaryotic system of biological containment for recombinant DNA experiments. Gene 8:17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeden, L., and K. Nasmyth. 1987. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell 48:389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breeden, L. L. 1997. Alpha-factor synchronization of budding yeast. Methods Enzymol. 283:332–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buratowski, S., and H. Zhou. 1992. Transcription factor IID mutants defective for interaction with transcription factor IIA. Science 255:1130–1132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrozza, M. J., L. Florens, S. K. Swanson, W. J. Shia, S. Anderson, J. Yates, M. P. Washburn, and J. L. Workman. 2005. Stable incorporation of sequence specific repressors Ash1 and Ume6 into the Rpd3L complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1731:77–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrozza, M. J., B. Li, L. Florens, T. Suganuma, S. K. Swanson, K. K. Lee, W. J. Shia, S. Anderson, J. Yates, M. P. Washburn, and J. L. Workman. 2005. Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription. Cell 123:581–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitikila, C., K. L. Huisinga, J. D. Irvin, A. D. Basehoar, and B. F. Pugh. 2002. Interplay of TBP inhibitors in global transcriptional control. Mol. Cell 10:871–882.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosma, M. P. 2004. Daughter-specific repression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO: Ash1 is the commander. EMBO Rep. 5:953–957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosma, M. P. 2002. Ordered recruitment: gene-specific mechanism of transcription activation. Mol. Cell 10:227–236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cosma, M. P., S. Panizza, and K. Nasmyth. 2001. Cdk1 triggers association of RNA polymerase to cell cycle promoters only after recruitment of the mediator by SBF. Mol. Cell 7:1213–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosma, M. P., T. Tanaka, and K. Nasmyth. 1999. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell 97:299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darst, R. P., A. Dasgupta, C. Zhu, J. Y. Hsu, A. Vroom, T. Muldrow, and D. T. Auble. 2003. Mot1 regulates the DNA binding activity of free TATA-binding protein in an ATP-dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 278:13216–13226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dasgupta, A., R. P. Darst, K. J. Martin, C. A. Afshari, and D. T. Auble. 2002. Mot1 activates and represses transcription by direct, ATPase-dependent mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2666–2671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deckert, J., and K. Struhl. 2002. Targeted recruitment of Rpd3 histone deacetylase represses transcription by inhibiting recruitment of Swi/Snf, SAGA, and TATA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6458–6470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Serna, I. L., Y. Ohkawa, C. A. Berkes, D. A. Bergstrom, C. S. Dacwag, S. J. Tapscott, and A. N. Imbalzano. 2005. MyoD targets chromatin remodeling complexes to the myogenin locus prior to forming a stable DNA-bound complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3997–4009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudley, A. M., C. Rougeulle, and F. Winston. 1999. The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. Genes Dev. 13:2940–2945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., K. M. Arndt, S. L. Ricupero, J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston. 1992. SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 6:1319–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., D. Biswas, Y. Yu, J. M. Stewart, and D. J. Stillman. 2004. TATA-binding protein mutants that are lethal in the absence of the Nhp6 high-mobility-group protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:6419–6429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geisberg, J. V., Z. Moqtaderi, L. Kuras, and K. Struhl. 2002. Mot1 associates with transcriptionally active promoters and inhibits association of NC2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:8122–8134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisberg, J. V., and K. Struhl. 2000. TATA-binding protein mutants that increase transcription from enhancerless and repressed promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1478–1488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geng, F., and B. C. Laurent. 2004. Roles of SWI/SNF and HATs throughout the dynamic transcription of a yeast glucose-repressible gene. EMBO J. 23:127–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govind, C. K., S. Yoon, H. Qiu, S. Govind, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 2005. Simultaneous recruitment of coactivators by Gcn4p stimulates multiple steps of transcription in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5626–5638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H. 1967. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J. Bacteriol. 93:1662–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A. H., K. E. Neely, and J. L. Workman. 2001. Histone acetyltransferase complexes stabilize Swi/Snf binding to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 104:817–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A. H., P. Prochasson, K. E. Neely, S. C. Galasinski, M. Chandy, M. J. Carrozza, and J. L. Workman. 2002. Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes. Cell 111:369–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herskowitz, I., B. Andrews, W. Kruger, J. Ogas, A. Sil, C. Coburn, and C. Peterson. 1992. Integration of multiple regulatory inputs in the control of HO expression in yeast, p. 949–974. In S. L. McKnight and K. R. Yamamoto (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Y., A. Gruhler, A. Heilbut, G. D. Bader, L. Moore, S. L. Adams, A. Millar, P. Taylor, K. Bennett, K. Boutilier, L. Yang, C. Wolting, I. Donaldson, S. Schandorff, J. Shewnarane, M. Vo, J. Taggart, M. Goudreault, B. Muskat, C. Alfarano, D. Dewar, Z. Lin, K. Michalickova, A. R. Willems, H. Sassi, P. A. Nielsen, K. J. Rasmussen, J. R. Andersen, L. E. Johansen, L. H. Hansen, H. Jespersen, A. Podtelejnikov, E. Nielsen, J. Crawford, V. Poulsen, B. D. Sorensen, J. Matthiesen, R. C. Hendrickson, F. Gleeson, T. Pawson, M. F. Moran, D. Durocher, M. Mann, C. W. Hogue, D. Figeys, and M. Tyers. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415:180–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson-Fisher, A. J., C. Chitikila, M. Mitra, and B. F. Pugh. 1999. A role for TBP dimerization in preventing unregulated gene expression. Mol. Cell 3:717–727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1998. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:797–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1997. Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters. Cell 89:365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasten, M. M., S. Dorland, and D. J. Stillman. 1997. A large protein complex containing the Sin3p and Rpd3p transcriptional regulators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4215–4221.
   Google Scholar
• Keogh, M. C., S. K. Kurdistani, S. A. Morris, S. H. Ahn, V. Podolny, S. R. Collins, M. Schuldiner, K. Chin, T. Punna, N. J. Thompson, C. Boone, A. Emili, J. S. Weissman, T. R. Hughes, B. D. Strahl, M. Grunstein, J. F. Greenblatt, S. Buratowski, and N. J. Krogan. 2005. Cotranscriptional set2 methylation of histone H3 lysine 36 recruits a repressive Rpd3 complex. Cell 123:593–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. L., D. B. Nikolov, and S. K. Burley. 1993. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature 365:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., J. H. Geiger, S. Hahn, and P. B. Sigler. 1993. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature 365:512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A., T. Miyake, Y. Ohyama, M. Kawaichi, and T. Kokubo. 2001. Mutations in the TATA-binding protein, affecting transcriptional activation, show synthetic lethality with the TAF145 gene lacking the TAF N-terminal domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276:395–405.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokubo, T., M. J. Swanson, J. I. Nishikawa, A. G. Hinnebusch, and Y. Nakatani. 1998. The yeast TAF145 inhibitory domain and TFIIA competitively bind to TATA-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1003–1012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krebs, J. E., M. H. Kuo, C. D. Allis, and C. L. Peterson. 1999. Cell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene. Genes Dev. 13:1412–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras, L., and K. Struhl. 1999. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 399:609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, X. Y., A. Virbasius, X. Zhu, and M. R. Green. 1999. Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors. Nature 399:605–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomvardas, S., and D. Thanos. 2001. Nucleosome sliding via TBP DNA binding in vivo. Cell 106:685–696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martel, L. S., H. J. Brown, and A. J. Berk. 2002. Evidence that TAF-TATA box-binding protein interactions are required for activated transcription in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2788–2798.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martens, J. H., M. Verlaan, E. Kalkhoven, and A. Zantema. 2003. Cascade of distinct histone modifications during collagenase gene activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1808–1816.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mateus, C., and S. V. Avery. 2000. Destabilized green fluorescent protein for monitoring dynamic changes in yeast gene expression with flow cytometry. Yeast 16:1313–1323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBride, H. J., A. Sil, V. Measday, Y. Yu, J. Moffat, M. E. Maxon, I. Herskowitz, B. Andrews, and D. J. Stillman. 2001. The protein kinase Pho85 is required for asymmetric accumulation of the Ash1 protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 42:345–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narlikar, G. J., H. Y. Fan, and R. E. Kingston. 2002. Cooperation between complexes that regulate chromatin structure and transcription. Cell 108:475–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. 1993. Regulating the HO endonuclease in yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3:286–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K., G. Adolf, D. Lydall, and A. Seddon. 1990. The identification of a second cell cycle control on the HO promoter in yeast: cell cycle regulation of SWI5 nuclear entry. Cell 62:631–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K., A. Seddon, and G. Ammerer. 1987. Cell cycle regulation of SWI5 is required for mother-cell-specific HO transcription in yeast. Cell 49:549–558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K., D. Stillman, and D. Kipling. 1987. Both positive and negative regulators of HO transcription are required for mother-cell-specific mating-type switching in yeast. Cell 48:579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, K. E., A. H. Hassan, A. E. Wallberg, D. J. Steger, B. R. Cairns, A. P. Wright, and J. L. Workman. 1999. Activation domain-mediated targeting of the SWI/SNF complex to promoters stimulates transcription from nucleosome arrays. Mol. Cell 4:649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, D., A. M. Campbell, Y. Bai, and P. A. Weil. 1994. Yeast Taf170 is encoded by MOT1 and exists in a TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-TBP-associated factor complex distinct from transcription factor IID. J. Biol. Chem. 269:23135–23140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pugh, B. F. 2000. Control of gene expression through regulation of the TATA-binding protein. Gene 255:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., C. Hu, S. Yoon, K. Natarajan, M. J. Swanson, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 2004. An array of coactivators is required for optimal recruitment of TATA binding protein and RNA polymerase II by promoter-bound Gcn4p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4104–4117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu, H., C. Hu, F. Zhang, G. J. Hwang, M. J. Swanson, C. Boonchird, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 2005. Interdependent recruitment of SAGA and Srb mediator by transcriptional activator Gcn4p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3461–3474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, P., and S. Hahn. 1991. Dominant negative mutations in yeast TFIID define a bipartite DNA-binding region. Cell 65:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, E., and C. L. Peterson. 1996. Functional analysis of the DNA-stimulated ATPase domain of yeast SWI2/SNF2. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:3685–3692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salma, N., H. Xiao, E. Mueller, and A. N. Imbalzano. 2004. Temporal recruitment of transcription factors and SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes during adipogenic induction of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma nuclear hormone receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4651–4663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, F. 1991. Getting started with yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194:1–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sil, A., and I. Herskowitz. 1996. Identification of an asymmetrically localized determinant, Ash1p, required for lineage-specific transcription of the yeast HO gene. Cell 84:711–722.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soutoglou, E., and I. Talianidis. 2002. Coordination of PIC assembly and chromatin remodeling during differentiation-induced gene activation. Science 295:1901–1904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, P. W., M. J. Stern, I. Clark, and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell 48:567–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, D. E., P. A. Grant, S. M. Roberts, L. J. Duggan, R. Belotserkovskaya, L. A. Pacella, F. Winston, J. L. Workman, and S. L. Berger. 1999. Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA-binding protein interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillman, D. J., S. Dorland, and Y. Yu. 1994. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SWI5 transcriptional activator. Genetics 136:781–788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, B. J., and R. Rothstein. 1989. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56:619–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trievel, R. C., J. R. Rojas, D. E. Sterner, R. N. Venkataramani, L. Wang, J. Zhou, C. D. Allis, S. L. Berger, and R. Marmorstein. 1999. Crystal structure and mechanism of histone acetylation of the yeast GCN5 transcriptional coactivator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8931–8936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelauer, M., J. Wu, N. Suka, and M. Grunstein. 2000. Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nature 408:495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., and R. E. Kingston. 1998. Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:545–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., P. Eriksson, L. T. Bhoite, and D. J. Stillman. 2003. Regulation of TATA-binding protein binding by the SAGA complex and the Nhp6 high-mobility group protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1910–1921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu, Y., P. Eriksson, and D. J. Stillman. 2000. Architectural transcription factors and the SAGA complex function in parallel pathways to activate transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2350–2357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar