REFERENCES
- Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.
- Asaoka-Taguchi M, Yamada M, Nakamura A, Hanyu K, Kobayashi S. 1999. Maternal Pumilio acts together with Nanos in germline development in Drosophila embryos. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:431–437.
- Barker DD, Wang C, Moore J, Dickinson LK, Lehmann R. 1992. Pumilio is essential for function but not for distribution of the Drosophila abdominal determinant Nanos. Genes Dev. 6:2312–2326.
- Cao Q, Padmanabhan K, Richter JD. 2010. Pumilio 2 controls translation by competing with eIF4E for 7-methyl guanosine cap recognition. RNA 16:221–227.
- Chagnovich D, Lehmann R. 2001. Poly(A)-independent regulation of maternal hunchback translation in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:11359–11364.
- Cheong CG, Hall TM. 2006. Engineering RNA sequence specificity of Pumilio repeats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:13635–13639.
- Cherbas L, et al. 2011. The transcriptional diversity of 25 Drosophila cell lines. Genome Res. 21:301–314.
- Cho PF, et al. 2006. Cap-dependent translational inhibition establishes two opposing morphogen gradients in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 16:2035–2041.
- Cho PF, et al. 2005. A new paradigm for translational control: inhibition via 5′–3′ mRNA tethering by Bicoid and the eIF4E cognate 4EHP. Cell 121:411–423.
- Chritton JJ, Wickens M. 2010. Translational repression by PUF proteins in vitro. RNA 16:1217–1225.
- Curtis D, et al. 1997. A CCHC metal-binding domain in Nanos is essential for translational regulation. EMBO J. 16:834–843.
- Dubnau J, et al. 2003. The staufen/pumilio pathway is involved in Drosophila long-term memory. Curr. Biol. 13:286–296.
- Edwards TA, Pyle SE, Wharton RP, Aggarwal AK. 2001. Structure of Pumilio reveals similarity between RNA and peptide binding motifs. Cell 105:281–289.
- Edwards TA, Wilkinson BD, Wharton RP, Aggarwal AK. 2003. Model of the brain tumor-Pumilio translation repressor complex. Genes Dev. 17:2508–2513.
- Forbes A, Lehmann R. 1998. Nanos and Pumilio have critical roles in the development and function of Drosophila germline stem cells. Development 125:679–690.
- Gamberi C, Peterson DS, He L, Gottlieb E. 2002. An anterior function for the Drosophila posterior determinant Pumilio. Development 129:2699–2710.
- Garcia-Rodriguez LJ, Gay AC, Pon LA. 2007. Puf3p, a Pumilio family RNA binding protein, localizes to mitochondria and regulates mitochondrial biogenesis and motility in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 176:197–207.
- Gebauer F, Hentze MW. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of translational control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:827–835.
- Gerber AP, Luschnig S, Krasnow MA, Brown PO, Herschlag D. 2006. Genome-wide identification of mRNAs associated with the translational regulator PUMILIO in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:4487–4492.
- Goldstrohm AC, Hook BA, Seay DJ, Wickens M. 2006. PUF proteins bind Pop2p to regulate messenger RNAs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:533–539.
- Goldstrohm AC, Seay DJ, Hook BA, Wickens M. 2007. PUF protein-mediated deadenylation is catalyzed by Ccr4p. J. Biol. Chem. 282:109–114.
- Goldstrohm AC, Wickens M. 2008. Multifunctional mRNA deadenylase complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:337–344.
- Gu W, Deng Y, Zenklusen D, Singer RH. 2004. A new yeast PUF family protein, Puf6p, represses ASH1 mRNA translation and is required for its localization. Genes Dev. 18:1452–1465.
- Hook BA, Goldstrohm AC, Seay DJ, Wickens M. 2007. Two yeast PUF proteins negatively regulate a single mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 282:15430–15438.
- Jackson JSJr, Houshmandi SS, Lopez Leban F, Olivas WM. 2004. Recruitment of the Puf3 protein to its mRNA target for regulation of mRNA decay in yeast. RNA 10:1625–1636.
- Kadyrova LY, Habara Y, Lee TH, Wharton RP. 2007. Translational control of maternal Cyclin B mRNA by Nanos in the Drosophila germline. Development 134:1519–1527.
- Kaye JA, Rose NC, Goldsworthy B, Goga A, L'Etoile ND. 2009. A 3′UTR pumilio-binding element directs translational activation in olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 61:57–70.
- Kraemer B, et al. 1999. NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm-oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol. 9:1009–1018.
- Lehmann R, Nusslein-Volhard C. 1987. hunchback, a gene required for segmentation of an anterior and posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 119:402–417.
- Lehmann R, Nusslein-Volhard C. 1987. Involvement of the pumilio gene in the transport of an abdominal signal in the Drosophila embyro. Nature 329:167–170.
- Lehmann R, Nusslein-Volhard C. 1991. The maternal gene nanos has a central role in posterior pattern formation of the Drosophila embryo. Development 112:679–691.
- Lin H, Spradling AC. 1997. A novel group of pumilio mutations affects the asymmetric division of germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary. Development 124:2463–2476.
- Lu G, Dolgner SJ, Hall TM. 2009. Understanding and engineering RNA sequence specificity of PUF proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19:110–115.
- Macdonald PM. 1992. The Drosophila pumilio gene: an unusually long transcription unit and an unusual protein. Development 114:221–232.
- Mee CJ, Pym EC, Moffat KG, Baines RA. 2004. Regulation of neuronal excitability through pumilio-dependent control of a sodium channel gene. J. Neurosci. 24:8695–8703.
- Menon KP, et al. 2004. The translational repressor Pumilio regulates presynaptic morphology and controls postsynaptic accumulation of translation factor eIF-4E. Neuron 44:663–676.
- Muraro NI, et al. 2008. Pumilio binds para mRNA and requires Nanos and Brat to regulate sodium current in Drosophila motoneurons. J. Neurosci. 28:2099–2109.
- Murata Y, Wharton RP. 1995. Binding of pumilio to maternal hunchback mRNA is required for posterior patterning in Drosophila embryos. Cell 80:747–756.
- Nakahata S, et al. 2001. Biochemical identification of Xenopus Pumilio as a sequence-specific cyclin B1 mRNA-binding protein that physically interacts with a Nanos homolog, Xcat-2, and a cytoplasmic polyadenylation element-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276:20945–20953.
- Nusslein-Volhard C, Frohnhofer HG, Lehmann R. 1987. Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 238:1675–1681.
- Olivas W, Parker R. 2000. The Puf3 protein is a transcript-specific regulator of mRNA degradation in yeast. EMBO J. 19:6602–6611.
- Parisi M, Lin H. 2000. Translational repression: a duet of Nanos and Pumilio. Curr. Biol. 10:R81–R83.
- Quenault T, Lithgow T, Traven A. 2011. PUF proteins: repression, activation and mRNA localization. Trends Cell Biol. 21:104–112.
- Saint-Georges Y, et al. 2008. Yeast mitochondrial biogenesis: a role for the PUF RNA-binding protein Puf3p in mRNA localization. PLoS One 3:e2293.
- Schneider I. 1972. Cell lines derived from late embryonic stages of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 27:353–365.
- Schweers BA, Walters KJ, Stern M. 2002. The Drosophila melanogaster translational repressor pumilio regulates neuronal excitability. Genetics 161:1177–1185.
- Sonoda J, Wharton RP. 2001. Drosophila Brain Tumor is a translational repressor. Genes Dev. 15:762–773.
- Sonoda J, Wharton RP. 1999. Recruitment of Nanos to hunchback mRNA by Pumilio. Genes Dev. 13:2704–2712.
- Suh N, et al. 2009. FBF and its dual control of gld-1 expression in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. Genetics 181:1249–1260.
- Tadauchi T, Matsumoto K, Herskowitz I, Irie K. 2001. Post-transcriptional regulation through the HO 3′-UTR by Mpt5, a yeast homolog of Pumilio and FBF. EMBO J. 20:552–561.
- Tautz D. 1988. Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres. Nature 332:281–284.
- Tautz D, Pfeifle C. 1989. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98:81–85.
- Vardy L, Orr-Weaver TL. 2007. The Drosophila PNG kinase complex regulates the translation of cyclin B. Dev. Cell 12:157–166.
- Wang C, Lehmann R. 1991. Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila. Cell 66:637–647.
- Wang X, McLachlan J, Zamore PD, Hall TM. 2002. Modular recognition of RNA by a human pumilio-homology domain. Cell 110:501–512.
- Wang Y, Cheong CG, Hall TM, Wang Z. 2009. Engineering splicing factors with designed specificities. Nat. Methods 6:825–830.
- Wharton RP, Sonoda J, Lee T, Patterson M, Murata Y. 1998. The Pumilio RNA-binding domain is also a translational regulator. Mol. Cell 1:863–872.
- Wharton RP, Struhl G. 1991. RNA regulatory elements mediate control of Drosophila body pattern by the posterior morphogen nanos. Cell 67:955–967.
- Wickens M, Bernstein DS, Kimble J, Parker R. 2002. A PUF family portrait: 3′UTR regulation as a way of life. Trends Genet. 18:150–157.
- Wickens M, Goodwin EB, Kimble J, Strickland S, Hentze MW. 2000. Translational control in developmental decisions, p 295–370. In Mathews M (ed.), Translational control, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York, NY.
- Wreden C, Verrotti AC, Schisa JA, Lieberfarb ME, Strickland S. 1997. Nanos and pumilio establish embryonic polarity in Drosophila by promoting posterior deadenylation of hunchback mRNA. Development 124:3015–3023.
- Ye B, et al. 2004. Nanos and Pumilio are essential for dendrite morphogenesis in Drosophila peripheral neurons. Curr. Biol. 14:314–321.
- Zamore PD, Bartel DP, Lehmann R, Williamson JR. 1999. The PUMILIO-RNA interaction: a single RNA-binding domain monomer recognizes a bipartite target sequence. Biochemistry 38:596–604.
- Zamore PD, Williamson JR, Lehmann R. 1997. The Pumilio protein binds RNA through a conserved domain that defines a new class of RNA-binding proteins. RNA 3:1421–1433.
- Zhang B, et al. 1997. A conserved RNA-binding protein that regulates sexual fates in the C. elegans hermaphrodite germ line. Nature 390:477–484.