Remodelers Organize Cellular Chromatin by Counteracting Intrinsic Histone-DNA Sequence Preferences in a Class-Specific Manner

REFERENCES

• Badis G, et al. 2008. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol. Cell 32:878–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caserta M, et al. 2009. A translational signature for nucleosome positioning in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:5309–5321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaban Y, et al. 2008. Structure of a RSC-nucleosome complex and insights into chromatin remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15:1272–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalkley GE, et al. 2008. The transcriptional coactivator SAYP is a trithorax group signature subunit of the PBAP chromatin remodeling complex. Molecular Cell. Biol. 28:2920–2929.
   Google Scholar
• Chalkley GE, Verrijzer CP. 2004. Immuno-depletion and purification strategies to study chromatin-remodeling factors in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 377:421–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clapier CR, Cairns BR. 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:273–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal RB, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S. 2010. Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 328:1161–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechassa ML, et al. 2010. SWI/SNF has intrinsic nucleosome disassembly activity that is dependent on adjacent nucleosomes. Mol. Cell 38:590–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew HR, Travers AA. 1985. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 186:773–790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeholm M, et al. 2009. Nucleosomes can invade DNA territories occupied by their neighbors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floer M, et al. 2010. A RSC/nucleosome complex determines chromatin architecture and facilitates activator binding. Cell 141:407–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuda NJ, Ardehali MB, Lis JT. 2009. Defining mechanisms that regulate RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nature 461:186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyodorov DV, Blower MD, Karpen GH, Kadonaga JT. 2004. Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo. Genes Dev. 18:170–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami S, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425:737–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giresi PG, Kim J, McDaniell RM, Iyer VR, Lieb JD. 2007. FAIRE (formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res. 17:877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkikopoulos T, et al. 2011. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization. Science 333:1758–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh WS, Orlov Y, Li J, Clarke ND. 2010. Blurring of high-resolution data shows that the effect of intrinsic nucleosome occupancy on transcription factor binding is mostly regional, not local. PLoS Comp. Biol. 6:e1000649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodsell DS, Dickerson RE. 1994. Bending and curvature calculations in B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:5497–5503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracey LE, et al. 2010. An in vitro-identified high-affinity nucleosome-positioning signal is capable of transiently positioning a nucleosome in vivo. Epigenet. Chromatin 3:13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hargreaves DC, Crabtree GR. 2011. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling: genetics, genomics and mechanisms. Cell Res. 21:396–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley PD, Madhani HD. 2009. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137:445–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S. 2008. Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Nat. Rev. 9:15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Ho L, Crabtree GR. 2010. Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 463:474–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horz W, Altenburger W. 1981. Sequence specific cleavage of DNA by micrococcal nuclease. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:2643–2658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Pugh BF. 2009. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat. Rev. 10:161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kaeser MD, Aslanian A, Dong MQ, Yates JR3rd, Emerson BM. 2008. BRD7, a novel PBAF-specific SWI/SNF subunit, is required for target gene activation and repression in embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 283:32254–32263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kal AJ, Mahmoudi T, Zak NB, Verrijzer CP. 2000. The Drosophila brahma complex is an essential coactivator for the trithorax group protein zeste. Genes Dev. 14:1058–1071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan N, et al. 2009. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458:362–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg RD. 1977. Structure of chromatin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 46:931–954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg RD, Stryer L. 1988. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:6677–6690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjuhan A, Svejstrup JQ. 2004. Evidence for distinct mechanisms facilitating transcript elongation through chromatin in vivo. EMBO J. 23:4243–4252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert N, Brehm A. 2009. Novel Mi-2 related ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers. Epigenetics 4:209–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange M, et al. 2008. Regulation of muscle development by DPF3, a novel histone acetylation and methylation reader of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 22:2370–2384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke G, Tolkunov D, Moqtaderi Z, Struhl K, Morozov AV. 2010. High-throughput sequencing reveals a simple model of nucleosome energetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:20998–21003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorch Y, Maier-Davis B, Kornberg RD. 2010. Mechanism of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:3458–3462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luger K, Mader AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389:251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd-Sarip A, et al. 2006. Architecture of a polycomb nucleoprotein complex. Mol. Cell 24:91–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohrmann L, et al. 2004. Differential targeting of two distinct SWI/SNF-related Drosophila chromatin-remodeling complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:3077–3088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moshkin YM, Mohrmann L, van Ijcken WF, Verrijzer CP. 2007. Functional differentiation of SWI/SNF remodelers in transcription and cell cycle control. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:651–661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng HH, Robert F, Young RA, Struhl K. 2002. Genome-wide location and regulated recruitment of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex. Genes Dev. 16:806–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parnell TJ, Huff JT, Cairns BR. 2008. RSC regulates nucleosome positioning at Pol II genes and density at Pol III genes. EMBO J. 27:100–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham CD, He X, Schnitzler GR. 2010. Divergent human remodeling complexes remove nucleosomes from strong positioning sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:400–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Protozanova E, Yakovchuk P, Frank-Kamenetskii MD. 2004. Stacked-unstacked equilibrium at the nick site of DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 342:775–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn J, Fyrberg AM, Ganster RW, Schmidt MC, Peterson CL. 1996. DNA-binding properties of the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Nature 379:844–847.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rando OJ, Chang HY. 2009. Genome-wide views of chromatin structure. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78:245–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reddy BA, et al. 2010. Drosophila transcription factor Tramtrack69 binds MEP1 to recruit the chromatin remodeler NuRD. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:5234–5244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippe K, et al. 2007. DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:15635–15640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala A, et al. 2011. Genome-wide characterization of chromatin binding and nucleosome spacing activity of the nucleosome remodelling ATPase ISWI. EMBO J. 30:1766–1777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segal E, et al. 2006. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442:772–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal E, Widom J. 2009. What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 25:335–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla MS, et al. 2010. Remosomes: RSC generated non-mobilized particles with approximately 180 bp DNA loosely associated with the histone octamer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107:1936–1941.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simonis M, et al. 2006. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38:1348–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein A, Takasuka TE, Collings CK. 2010. Are nucleosome positions in vivo primarily determined by histone-DNA sequence preferences? Nucleic Acids Res. 38:709–719.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Travers A, Hiriart E, Churcher M, Caserta M, Di Mauro E. 2010. The DNA sequence-dependence of nucleosome positioning in vivo and in vitro. J. Biomol. Struct. Dynamics 27:713–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valouev A, et al. 2008. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 18:1051–1063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weake VM, Workman JL. 2010. Inducible gene expression: diverse regulatory mechanisms. Nat. Rev. 11:426–437.
   Google Scholar
• Weiner A, Hughes A, Yassour M, Rando OJ, Friedman N. 2010. High-resolution nucleosome mapping reveals transcription-dependent promoter packaging. Genome Res. 20:90–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse I, Tsukiyama T. 2006. Antagonistic forces that position nucleosomes in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worby CA, Simonson-Leff N, Dixon JE. 2001. RNA interference of gene expression (RNAi) in cultured Drosophila cells. Sci. STKE 2001:PL1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu C, Travers A. 2005. Relative affinities of DNA sequences for the histone octamer depend strongly upon both the temperature and octamer concentration. Biochemistry 44:14329–14334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xi Y, Yao J, Chen R, Li W, He X. 2011. Nucleosome fragility reveals novel functional states of chromatin and poises genes for activation. Genome Res. 21:718–724.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamada K, et al. 2011. Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a. Nature 472:448–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaret KS, et al. 2008. Pioneer factors, genetic competence, and inductive signaling: programming liver and pancreas progenitors from the endoderm. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 73:119–126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, et al. 2009. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16:847–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, et al. 2011. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332:977–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar