Agonist-Specific Conformational Changes in the Yeast α-Factor Pheromone Receptor

REFERENCES

• Ackers, G. K., and J. H. Hazzard. 1993. Transduction of binding energy into hemoglobin cooperativity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18:385–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. M. 1994. Structure and function of receptors coupled to G proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:180–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardwell, L., J. G. Cook, C. J. Inouye, and J. Thorner. 1994. Signal propagation and regulation in the mating pheromone response pathway of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Dev. Biol. 166:363–379.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blinder, D., S. Bouvier, and D. D. Jenness. 1989. Constitutive mutants in the yeast pheromone response: ordered function of the gene products. Cell 56:479–486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blinder, D., and D. D. Jenness. 1989. Regulation of postreceptor signaling in the pheromone response pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:3720–3726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumer, K. J., and J. Thorner. 1990. β and γ subunits of a yeast guanine nucleotide-binding protein are not essential for membrane association of the α subunit but are required for receptor coupling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4363–4367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bond, R. A., P. Leff, T. D. Johnson, C. A. Milano, H. A. Rockman, T. R. McMinn, S. Apparsundaram, M. F. Hyek, T. P. Kenakin, L. F. Allen, and R. J. Lefkowitz. 1995. Physiological effects of inverse agonists in transgenic mice with myocardial overexpression of the β2-adrenoreceptor. Nature (London) 374:272–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, C., N. G. Davis, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1993. Mutations that alter the third cytoplasmic loop of the a-factor receptor Lead to a constitutive and hypersensitive phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:9921–9925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukusoglu, G., K. Schandel, and D. D. Jenness. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., and J. B. Konopka. 1996. Regulation of the G-protein-coupled α-factor pheromone receptor by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:247–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chvatchko, Y., I. Howald, and H. Reizman. 1986. Two yeast mutants defective in endocytosis are defective in pheromone response. Cell 46:355–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, C. D., T. Palzkill, and D. Botstein. 1994. Systematic mutagenesis of the yeast mating pheromone receptor third intracellular loop. J. Biol. Chem. 269:8831–8841.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietzel, C., and J. Kurjan. 1987. The yeast SCG1 gene: a Ga-like protein implicated in the a- and α-factor response pathway. Cell 50:1001–1010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohlman, H. G., J. Thorner, M. G. Caron, and R. J. Lefkowitz. 1991. Model systems for the study of seven-transmembrane-segment receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60:653–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriotou-Bargiota, E., C. B. Xue, F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1992. Antagonistic and synergistic peptide analogues of the tridecapeptide mating pheromone of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 31:551–557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fahmy, K., F. Siebert, and T. P. Sakmar. 1995. Photoactivated state of rhodopsin and how it can form. Biophys. Chem. 56:171–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gether, U., S. Lin, and B. K. Kobilka. 1995. Fluorescent labeling of purified adrenergic receptor. Evidence for ligand-specific conformational changes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:28268–28275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H. 1967. Macromolecule synthesis in temperature-sensitive mutants of yeast. J. Bacteriol. 93:1662–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H. 1980. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae unresponsive to cell division control by polypeptide mating hormone. J. Cell Biol. 85:811–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. L., J. B. Konopka, and L. H. Hartwell. 1991. S. cerevisiae a pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination. Cell 67:389–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenness, D. D., B. S. Goldman, and L. H. Hartwell. 1987. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants unresponsive to α-factor pheromone: a-factor binding and extragenic suppression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:1311–1319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenness, D. D., and P. Spatrick. 1986. Down regulation of the a-factor pheromone receptor in S. cerevisiae. Cell 46:345–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• König, B., A. Arendt, J. H. McDowell, M. Kahlert, P. A. Hargrave, and K. P. Hofmann. 1989. Three cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin interact with trans-ducin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6878–6882.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konopka, J. B. 1993. AFR1 acts in conjunction with the a-factor receptor to promote morphogenesis and adaptation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:6876–6888.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konopka, J. B., D. D. Jenness, and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The C-terminus of the S. cerevisiae α-pheromone receptor mediates an adaptive response to pheromone. Cell 54:609–620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kühn, H., O. Mommertz, and P. A. Hargrave. 1982. Light-dependent conformational change at rhodopsin’s cytoplasmic surface detected by increased susceptibility to proteolysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 679:95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, X., D. Zhang, and H. Weinstein. 1994. Ligand-induced domain motion in the activation mechanism of a G-protein-coupled receptor. Protein Eng. 7:1441–1448.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh, L. 1992. Substitutions in the hydrophobic core of the α-factor receptor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae permit response to Saccharomyces kluyveri α-factor and to antagonist. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3959–3966.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh, L., A. M. Neiman, and I. Herskowitz. 1991. Signal transduction during pheromone response in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 7:699–728.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monod, J., J. Wyman, and J.-P. Changeux. 1965. On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 12:88–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naider, F., and J. M. Becker. 1986. Structure-activity relationships of the yeast a-factor. Crit. Rev. Biochem. 21:225–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicone, C., G. Nullans, N. J. Cook, and N. Virmaux. 1985. Light-induced conformational changes in the extradiscal regions of bovine rhodopsin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 127:816–821.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raths, S. K., F. Naider, and J. M. Becker. 1988. Peptide analogues compete with the binding of α-factor to its receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 263:17333–17341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ren, Q., H. Kurose, R. J. Lefkowitz, and S. Cotecchia. 1993. Constitutively active mutants of the α2-adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 268:16483–16487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneke, J. E., K. J. Blumer, W. E. Courchesne, and J. Thorner. 1988. The carboxy-terminal segment of the yeast α-factor receptor is a regulatory domain. Cell 55:221–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohrer, J., H. Benedetti, B. Zanolari, and H. Riezman. 1993. Identification of a novel sequence mediating regulated endocytosis of the G protein-coupled α-pheromone receptor in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 4:511–521.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Samama, P., S. Cotecchia, T. Costa, and R. J. Lefkowitz. 1993. A mutation-induced activated state of the β2-adrenergic receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 268:4625–4636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachman, H. K. 1988. Can a simple model account for the allosteric transition of aspartate transcarbamoylase? J. Biol. Chem. 263:18583–18586.
   Google Scholar
• Schandel, K. A., and D. D. Jenness. 1994. Direct evidence for ligand-induced internalization of the yeast α-factor pheromone receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7245–7255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, R. E., E. R. Prossnitz, R. D. Ye, C. G. Cochrane, and G. M. Bokoch. 1994. Domains of the human neutrophil N-formyl peptide receptor involved in G-protein coupling—mapping with receptor-derived peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 269:326–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz, J., B. Ferguson, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1995. Signal transduction and growth control in yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, M. A., M. M. Dixon, R. Kluger, R. T. Jones, and R. G. Brennan. 1995. Allosteric transition intermediates modelled by crosslinked haemoglobins. Nature (London) 375:84–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Segall, J. E. 1993. Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of α mating factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:8332–8336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenbagamurthi, P., R. Baffi, S. A. Khan, P. Lipke, C. Pousman, J. M. Becker, and F. Naider. 1983. Structure-activity relationships in the dode-capeptide α factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 22:1298–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefan, C. J., and K. J. Blumer. 1994. The third cytoplasmic loop of a yeast G-protein-coupled receptor controls pathway activation, ligand discrimination, and receptor internalization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3339–3349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strader, C. D., T. M. Fong, M. P. Graziano, and M. R. Tota. 1995. The family of G-protein-coupled receptors. FASEB J. 9:745–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strader, C. D., T. M. Fong, M. R. Tota, and D. Underwood. 1994. Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:101–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. M., and R. R. Neubig. 1994. Peptides as probes for G protein signal transduction. Cell. Signalling 6:841–849.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiner, J. L., C. Guttierez-Steil, and K. J. Blumer. 1993. Disruption of receptor-G protein coupling in yeast promotes the function of an SST2-dependent adaptation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 268:8070–8077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss, E. R., D. J. Kelleher, and G. L. Johnson. 1988. Mapping sites of interaction between rhodopsin and transducin using rhodopsin antipeptide antibodies. J. Biol. Chem. 263:6150–6154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zanolari, B., S. Raths, B. Singer-Kruger, and H. Riezman. 1992. Yeast pheromone receptor endocytosis and hyperphosphorylation are independent of G protein-mediated signal transduction. Cell 71:755–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, D., and H. Weinstein. 1993. Signal transduction by a 5-HT2 receptor: a mechanistic hypothesis from molecular dynamics simulations of the three-dimensional model of the receptor complexed to ligands. J. Med. Chem. 36:934–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar