Alleviation of Histone H1-Mediated Transcriptional Repression and Chromatin Compaction by the Acidic Activation Region in Chromosomal Protein HMG-14

REFERENCES

• Albright, S. C., J. M. Wiseman, R. A. Lange, and W. T. Garrard. 1980. Subunit structures of different electrophoretic forms of nucleosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 255:3673–3684.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfonso, P. J., M. P. Crippa, J. J. Hayes, and M. Bustin. 1994. The footprint of chromosomal proteins HMG-14 and HMG-17 on chromatin subunits. J. Mol. Biol. 236:189–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allan, J., P. G. Hartman, C. Crane-Robinson, and F. X. Aviles. 1980. The structure of histone H1 and its location in chromatin. Nature 288:675–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J., G. J. Cowling, N. Harborne, P. Cattini, R. Craigie, and H. Gould. 1981. Regulation of the higher-order structure of chromatin by histones H1 and H5. J. Cell Biol. 90:279–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, C., H. Lowman, A. Rajadhyaksha, V. Blasquez, and M. Bina. 1990. Location of nucleosomes in simian virus 40 chromatin. J. Mol. Biol. 214:875–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barratt, M. J., C. A. Hazzalin, N. Zhelev, and L. C. Mahadevan. 1994. A mitogen- and anisomycin-stimulated kinase phosphorylates HMG-14 in its basic amino-terminal domain in vivo and on isolated mononucleosomes. EMBO J. 13:4524–4535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batson, S. C., R. Sundseth, C. V. Heath, M. Samuels, and U. Hansen. 1992. In vitro initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II on in vivo-assembled chromatin templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1639–1651.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Batson, S. C., S. Rimsky, R. Sundseth, and U. Hansen. 1993. Association of nucleosome-free regions and basal transcription factors with in vivo-assembled chromatin templates active in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3459–3468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belikov, S. V., A. I. Belgovsky, O. V. Preobrazhenskaya, V. L. Karpov, and A. D. Mirzabekov. 1993. Two non-histone proteins are associated with the promoter region and histone H1 with the transcribed region of active hsp-70 genes as revealed by UV-induced DNA-protein crosslinking in vivo. Nucl. Acids Res. 21:1031–1034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertrand-Mercat, P., and J. R. Pasqualini. 1991. Antagonistic effect of the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen on estradiol-stimulated acetylation of nuclear high mobility group (HMG) proteins in the uterus of newborn guineapigs. Life Sci. 48:2081–2087.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bustin, M., D. A. Lehn, and D. Landsman. 1990. Structural features of the HMG chromosomal proteins and their genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1049:231–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustin, M., P. S. Becerra, M. P. Crippa, D. A. Lehn, J. M. Pash, and J. Shiloach. 1991. Recombinant human chromosomal proteins HMG-14 and HMG-17. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:3115–3121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bustin, M., L. Trieschmann, and Y. V. Postnikov. 1995. The HMG-14/-17 chromosomal protein family: architectural elements that enhance transcription from chromatin templates. Semin. Cell Biol. 6:247–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, D. J., and T. Kimura. 1990. Electrostatic mechanism of chromatin folding. J. Mol. Biol. 211:883–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, J., J. Quinn, J. L. Workman, and C. L. Peterson. 1994. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science 265:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crippa, M. P., P. J. Alfonso, and M. Bustin. 1992. Nucleosome core binding region of chromosomal protein HMG-17 acts as an independent functional domain. J. Mol. Biol. 228:442–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crippa, M. P., L. Trieschmann, P. J. Alfonso, A. P. Wolffe, and M. Bustin. 1993. Deposition of chromosomal protein HMG-17 during replication affects the nucleosomal ladder and transcriptional potential of nascent chromatin. EMBO J. 12:3855–3864.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Croston, G. E., L. A. Kerrigan, L. M. Lira, D. R. Marshak, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1991. Sequence-specific antirepression of histone H1-mediated inhibition of basal RNA polymerase II transcription. Science 251:643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H.-F., and U. Hansen. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H.-F., S. Rimsky, S. C. Batson, M. Bustin, and U. Hansen. 1994. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II elongation by chromosomal protein HMG-14. Science 265:796–799.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding, H.-F., L. Trieschmann, Y. V. Postnikov, A. Rickers, M. Bustin, and U. Hansen. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, C., U. Grossbach, B. Bjorkroth, and B. Daneholt. 1990. Presence of histone H1 on an active Balbiani ring gene. Cell 60:73–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng, J., and B. Villeponteau. 1990. Serum stimulation of the c-fos enhancer induces reversible changes in c-fos chromatin structure. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:1126–1133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrard, W. T. 1991. Histone H1 and the conformation of transcriptionally active chromatin. Bioessays 13:87–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giri, C., D. Landsman, N. Soares, and M. Bustin. 1987. Modulation of the cellular ratio of chromosomal high mobility group proteins 14 to 17 in transfected cells. J. Biol. Chem. 262:9839–9843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldman, M. A., G. P. Holmquist, M. C. Gray, L. A. Caston, and A. Nag. 1984. Replication timing of genes and middle repetitive sequences. Science 224:686–692.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodwin, G. H., and C. G. P. Mathew. 1982. Role in gene structure and function, p. 193–221. In E. W. Johns (ed.), The HMG chromosomal proteins. Academic Press Inc., New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, V., and V. Ramakrishnan. 1990. Interaction of HMG14 with chromatin. J. Mol. Biol. 214:897–910.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, J. C., and A. P. Wolffe. 1992. Influence of chromatin folding on transcription initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase III. Biochemistry 31:7977–7988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatton, K. S., V. Dhar, E. H. Brown, M. A. Iqbal, S. Stuart, V. T. Didamo, and C. L. Schildkraut. 1988. Replication program of active and inactive multigene families in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2149–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izban, M. G., and D. S. Luse. 1992. Factor-stimulated RNA polymerase II transcribes at physiological elongation rates on naked DNA but very poorly on chromatin templates. J. Biol. Chem. 267:13647–13655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamakaka, R. T., and J. O. Thomas. 1990. Chromatin structure of transcriptionally competent and repressed genes. EMBO J. 9:3997–4006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamakaka, R. T., M. Bulger, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1993. Potentiation of RNA polymerase II transcription by Gal4-VP16 during but not after DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 7:1779–1795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura, T., F. C. Mills, J. Allan, and H. Gould. 1983. Selective unfolding of erythroid chromatin in the region of the active þ-globin gene. Nature 306:709–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg, R. D., and Y. Lorch. 1992. Chromatin structure and transcription. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8:563–587.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwon, H., A. N. Imbalzano, P. A. Khavarl, R. E. Kingston, and M. R. Green. 1994. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SWI/SNF complex. Nature 370:477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsman, D., and M. Bustin. 1991. Assessment of the transcriptional activation potential of the HMG chromosomal proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4483–4489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leuba, S. H., J. Zlatanova, and K. van Holde. 1993. On the location of histones H1 and H5 in the chromatin fiber. Studies with immobilized trypsin and chymotrypsin. J. Mol. Biol. 229:917–929.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu, Q., L. L. Wallrath, and S. C. R. Elgin. 1994. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation. J. Cell. Biochem. 55:83–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma, J., and M. Ptashne. 1987. Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments. Cell 48:847–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, A., D. Brown, S. Kerby, I. Rudzinski, T. Polte, Z. Randhawa, and M. M. Seidman. 1991. Sequence of human HMG2 cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardian, J. K. W., A. E. Paton, G. J. Bunick, and D. E. Olins. 1980. Nucleosome cores have two specific binding sites for nonhistone chromosomal proteins HMG 14 and HMG 17. Science 209:1534–1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacheva, G. A., D. Y. Guschin, O. V. Preobrazhenskaya, V. L. Karpov, K. K. Ebralidse, and A. D. Mirzabekov. 1989. Change in the pattern of histone binding to DNA upon transcriptional activation. Cell 58:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. P., S. C. Albright, J. M. Wiseman, and W. T. Garrard. 1979. Reassociation of histone H1 with nucleosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 254:11751–11760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. E., G. Meersseman, S. Pennings, and E. M. Bradbury. 1995. Deposition of histone H1 onto reconstituted nucleosome arrays inhibits both initiation and elongation of transcripts by T7 RNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1075–1082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paranjape, S. M., R. T. Kamakaka, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1994. Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:265–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paranjape, S. M., A. Krumm, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1995. HMG17 is a chromatin-specific transcriptional coactivator that increases the efficiency of transcription initiation. Genes Dev. 9:1978–1991.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasqualini, J. R., R. Sterner, P. Mercat, and V. G. Allfrey. 1989. Estradiol enhanced acetylation of nuclear high mobility group proteins of the uterus of newborn guinea pigs. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 161:1260–1266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pederson, D. S., F. Thoma, and R. T. Simpson. 1986. Core particle, fiber, and transcriptionally active chromatin structure. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 2:117–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., and J. W. Tamkun. 1995. The SWI-SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Postnikov, Y. V., L. Trieschmann, A. Rickers, and M. Bustin. 1995. Homodimers of chromosomal proteins HMG-14 and HMG-17 in nucleosome cores. J. Mol. Biol. 252:423–432.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruss, D., B. Bartholomew, J. Persinger, J. Hayes, G. Arents, E. N. Moudrianakis, and A. P. Wolffe. 1996. An asymmetric model for the nucleosome: a binding site for linker histones inside the DNA gyres. Science 274:614–617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renz, M., P. Nehls, and J. Hozier. 1977. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the chromosome fiber. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:1879–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandeen, G., W. I. Wood, and G. Felsenfeld. 1980. The interaction of high mobility proteins HMG14 and 17 with nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 8:3757–3778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shykind, B. M., J. Kim, and P. A. Sharp. 1995. Activation of the TFIID-TFIIA complex with HMG-2. Genes Dev. 9:1354–1365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, R. T. 1978. Structure of the chromatosome, a chromatin particle containing 160 base pairs of DNA and all the histones. Biochemistry 17:5524–5531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, S. W., N. W. Fucile, D. P. Bofinger, and L. G. Sheflin. 1991. Cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate-dependent phosphorylation of HMG 14 inhibits its interactions with nucleosomes. Mol. Endocrinol. 5:42–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalder, J., M. Groudine, J. B. Dodgson, J. D. Engel, and H. Weintraub. 1980. Hb switching in chickens. Cell 19:973–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staynov, D. Z., and C. Crane-Robinson. 1988. Footprinting of linker histones H5 and H1 on the nucleosome. EMBO J. 7:3685–3691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thoma, F., T. Koller, and A. Klug. 1979. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 83:403–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. O. 1984. The higher order structure of chromatin and histone H1. J. Cell Sci. Suppl. 1:1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trieschmann, L., P. J. Alfonso, M. P. Crippa, A. P. Wolffe, and M. Bustin. 1995. Incorporation of chromosomal proteins HMG-14/-17 into nascent nucleosomes induces an extended chromatin conformation and enhances the utilization of active transcription complexes. EMBO J. 14:1478–1489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trieschmann, L., Y. V. Postnikov, A. Rickers, and M. Bustin. 1995. Modular structure of chromosomal proteins HMG-14/-17: definition of a transcriptional enhancement domain distinct from the nucleosomal binding domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6663–6669.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsukiyama, T., and C. Wu. 1995. Purification and properties of an ATP- dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell 83:1011–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uberbacher, E. C., J. K. W. Mardian, R. M. Rossi, D. E. Olins, and G. J. Bunick. 1982. Neutron scattering studies and modeling of high mobility group 14 core nucleosome complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:5258–5262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Holde, K. E. 1989. Chromatin. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Vilarreal, L. P. 1991. Relationship of eukaryotic DNA replication to committed gene expression: general theory for gene control. Microbiol. Rev. 55:512–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weintraub, H. 1984. Histone-H1-dependent chromatin superstructures and the suppression of gene activity. Cell 38:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weintraub, H., and M. Groudine. 1976. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193:848–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, F., and M. Carlson. 1992. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 8:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. 1995. Chromatin: structure and function, 2nd ed. Academic Press Inc., London, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P. 1994. Nucleosome positioning and modification: chromatin structures that potentiate transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19:240–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., and A. R. Buchman. 1993. Multiple functions of nucleosomes and regulatory factors in transcription. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18:90–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zlatanova, J. 1990. Histone H1 and the regulation of transcription of eukaryotic genes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15:273–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar