Role for ADA/GCN5 Products in Antagonizing Chromatin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression

REFERENCES

• Allan, J., N. Harborne, D. C. Rau, and H. Gould. 1982. Participation of core histone “tails” in the stabilization of the chromatin solenoid. J. Cell Biol. 93:285–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, B., and I. Herskowitz. 1989. Identification of a DNA binding factor involved in cell-cycle control of the yeast HO gene. Cell 57:21–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ashrof, S., and C. L. Peterson. Unpublished results.
   Google Scholar
• Ausio, J., F. Dong, and K. E. van Holde. 1989. Use of selectively trypsinized nucleosome core particles to analyze the role of the histone “tails” in the stabilization of the nucleosome. J. Mol. Biol. 206:451–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlev, N. A., R. Candau, L. Wang, P. Darpino, N. Silverman, and S. L. Berger. 1995. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor, ADA2, with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270:19337–19344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger, S. L., B. Pina, N. Silverman, G. A. Marcus, J. Agapite, J. L. Regier, S. J. Triezenberg, and L. Guarente. 1992. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional activator required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell 70:251–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berger, S. L., W. D. Cress, A. Cress, S. J. Triezenberg, and L. Guarente. 1990. Selective inhibition of activated but not basal transcription by the acidic activation domain of VP16: evidence for transcriptional adaptors. Cell 61:1199–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandl, C. J., A. M. Furlanetto, J. A. Martens, and K. S. Hamilton. 1993. Characterization of NGG1, a novel yeast gene required for glucose repression of GAL4p-regulated transcription. EMBO J. 12:5255–5265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breeden, L., and K. Nasmyth. 1987. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell 48:389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell, J. E., and C. D. Allis. 1995. An activity gel assay detects a single, catalytically active histone acetyltransferase subunit in Tetrahymena macronuclei. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6364–6368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, J. E., J. Zhou, T. Ranalli, R. Kobayashi, D. G. Edmonson, S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis. 1996. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84:843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B., and R. Kornberg. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R., R. S. Levinson, K. R. Yamamoto, and R. D. Kornberg. 1996. Essential role of Swp73p in the function of yeast Swi/Snf complex. Genes Dev. 10:2131–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R., Y. J. Kim, M. H. Sayre, B. C. Laurent, and R. D. Kornberg. 1994. A multisubunit complex containing the SWI1/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3, SNF5, and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1950–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celenza, J. L., and M. Carlson. 1984. Cloning and genetic mapping of SNF11, a gene required for expression of glucose-repressible genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. C., P. Komarnitsky, D. Chase, and C. L. Denis. 1996. ADR1 activation of domains contact the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 and the core transcriptional factor TFIIB. J. Biol. Chem. 271:32359–32365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cote, J., J. Quinn, J. Workman, and C. L. Peterson. 1994. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF protein complex. Science 265:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, J., J. Workman, and S. Berger. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Dallas, P. B., P. Yaciuk, and E. Moran. 1997. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies raised against p300: both p300 and CBP are present in intracellular TBP complexes. J. Virol. 71:1726–1731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edmonson, D. G., M. M. Smith, and S. Y. Roth. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247–1259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fletcher, T. M., and J. C. Hansen. 1996. The nucleosomal array: structure/ function relationships. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 6:149–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia-Ramirez, M., F. Dong, and J. Ausio. 1992. Role of the histone “tails” in the folding of oligonucleosomes depleted of histone H1. J. Biol. Chem. 267:19587–19595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geitz, R. D., and R. H. Scheistl. 1991. Applications of high efficiency lithium acetate transformation of intact yeast cells using single stranded nucleic acids as carrier. Yeast 7:253–263.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgakopoulos, T., and G. Thireos. 1992. Two distinct yeast transcriptionalactivators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J. 11:4145–4152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunstein, M. 1990. Histone function in transcription. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 6:643–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guthrie, C., and G. R. Fink. 1991. Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. Methods Enzymol. 194:1–933.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han, M., U.-J. Kim, P. Kayne, and M. Grunstein. 1988. Depletion of histone H4 and nucleosomes activates the PHO5 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 7:2221–2228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, J. C. The core histone amino-termini: combinatorial interaction domains that link chromatin structure with function. ChemTracts Biochem. Mol. Biol., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. C., J. Ausio, V. H. Stanik, and K. E. van Holde. 1989. Homogeneous reconstituted oligonucleosomes, evidence for salt-dependent folding in the absence of histone H1. Biochemistry 28:9129–9136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happel, A. M., M. S. Swanson, and F. Winston. 1991. The SNF2, SNF5, and SNF6 genes are required for Ty transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 128:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, A., T. Laroche, S. Strahl-Bolsinger, S. M. Gasser, and M. Grunstein. 1995. Histone H3 and H4 N-termini interact with SIR3 and SIR4 proteins: a molecular model for the formation of heterochromatin in yeast. Cell 80:583–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksson, A., T. Almlof, J. Ford, I. J. McEwan, J. Gustafsson, and A. P. H. Wright. 1997. Role of the Ada adaptor complex in gene activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3065–3073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, J. N., S. A. Brown, C. D. Clark, and F. Winston. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 6:2288–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, J., N. Silverman, G. A. Marcus, and L. Guarente. 1995. ADA3, a putative transcriptional adaptor, consists of two separable domains and interacts with ADA2 and GCN5 in a trimeric complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1203–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horz, W. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. W., and D. J. Stillman. 1995. Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator. Genetics 140:103–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemphues, K. J., E. C. Raff, and T. C. Kaufman. 1983. Genetic analysis of b2t, the structural gene for a testis-specific b-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 104:345–356.
   Google Scholar
• Kemphues, K. J., T. C. Kaufman, R. A. Raff, and E. C. Raff. 1982. The testis-specific b-tubulin subunit in Drosophila melanogaster has multiple functions in spermatogenesis. Cell 31:655–670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kruger, W., C. L. Peterson, A. Sil, C. Coburn, G. Arents, E. N. Moundri-anakis, and I. Herskowitz. 1995. Amino acid substitutions in the structured domains of histones H3 and H4 partially relieve the requirement of the yeast SWI/SNF complex for transcription. Genes Dev. 9:2770–2779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, W., and I. Herskowitz. 1991. A negative regulator of HO transcription, SIN1 (SPT2), is a nonspecific DNA-binding protein related to HMG1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4135–4146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M., J. E. Brownell, R. E. Sobel, T. A. Ranalli, R. G. Cook, D. G. Edmonson, S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis. 1996. Transcription-linked acetylation by Gcn5p of histones H3 and H4 at specific lysines. Nature 383:269–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., A. N. Imbalzano, P. A. Khavari, R. E. Kingston, and M. R. Green. 1994. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SWI/SNF complex. Nature 370:477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. A., N. Silverman, S. A. Berger, J. Horiuchi, and L. Guarente. 1994. Functional similarity and physical association between GCN5 and ADA2: putative transcriptional adaptors. EMBO J. 13:4807–4815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melcher, K., and S. A. Johnston. 1995. GAL4 interacts with TATA-binding protein and coactivators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:2839–2848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, M. E., B. R. Cairns, R. S. Levinson, K. R. Yamamoto, D. A. Engel, and M. M. Smith. 1996. Adenovirus E1A specifically blocks SWI/SNF-dependent transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5737–5743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muchardt, C., J. C. Reyes, B. Bourachot, E. Legoy, and M. Yaniv. 1996. The hbrm and BRG-1 proteins, components of the human SWI/SNF complex, are phosphorylated and excluded from the condensed chromosomes during mitosis. EMBO J. 15:3394–3402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Neigeborn, L., and M. Carlson. 1984. Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 108:845–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paranjape, S. M., R. T. Kamakaka, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1994. Role of chromatin structure in the regulation of transcription by RNA polymerase II. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:265–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., and I. Herskowitz. 1992. Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 genes, which encode a global activator of transcription. Cell 68:573–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., A. Dingwall, and M. P. Scott. 1994. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multi-subunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2905–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., W. Kruger, and I. Herskowitz. 1991. A Functional interaction between the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and the negative regulator SIN1. Cell 64:1135–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., and J. W. Tamkun. 1995. The SWI/SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, T. A., Y.-P. Hwung, D. P. McDonnell, and B. W. O’Malley. 1991. Transactivation functions facilitate the disruption of chromatin structure by estrogen receptor derivitives in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 266:18179–18187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pina, B., S. Berger, G. A. Marcus, N. Silverman, J. Agapite, and L. Guarente. 1993. ADA3: a gene, identified by resistance to GAL4-VP16, with properties similar to and different from those of ADA2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:5981–5989.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollard, K. Unpublished results.
   Google Scholar
• Prelich, G., and F. Winston. 1993. Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics 135:665–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J., A. M. Fyrberg, R. W. Ganster, M. C. Schmidt, and C. L. Peterson. 1996. DNA-binding properties of the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Nature 379:844–847.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn, J., and C. L. Peterson. Unpublished results.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., P. Novick, J. H. Thomas, D. Botstein, and G. R. Fink. 1987. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic bank based on a centromere-containing shuttle vector. Gene 60:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, R. Kobayashi, S. Bavykin, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1996. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14503–14508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, A., V. Lang, R. Cook, and C. J. Brandl. 1997. Identification of native complexes containing the yeast coactivator/repressor proteins NGG1/ADA3 and ADA2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:5571–5578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, N., J. Agapite, and L. Guarente. 1994. Yeast ADA2 protein binds to the VP16 protein activation domain and activates transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11665–11668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steinberg, R. A., and D. A. Agard. 1981. Turnover of regulatory subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in S49 mouse lymphoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 256:10731–10734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M., R. Jensen, and I. Herskowitz. 1984. Five SWI/SNF genes are required for expression of the HO gene in yeast. J. Mol. Biol. 178:853–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, R., G. Vidali, R. L. Heinrikson, and V. G. Alfrey. 1978. Postsynthetic modification of high mobility group proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 253:7601–7604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stillman, D. J., S. Dorland, and Y. Yu. 1994. Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SWI5 transcriptional activator. Genetics 136:781–788.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Treich, I., B. R. Cairns, T. D. L. Santos, E. Brewster, and M. Carlson. 1995. SNF11, a new component of the yeast SNF-SWI complex that interacts with a conserved region of SWI2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4240–4248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechser, M. A., M. P. Kladde, J. A. Alfieri, and C. L. Peterson. Effects of Sin2 versions of histone H4 on yeast chromatin structure and function. EMBO J., in press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P., and D. Pruss. 1996. Targeting chromatin disruption: transcription regulators that acetylate histones. Cell 84:817–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.-J. C., D. J. Sharpe, and S. S. Wong. 1991. High-mobility group and other nonhistone substrates for nuclear histone N-acetyltransferase. Biochem. Genet. 29:461–475.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Workman, J. L., I. C. A. Taylor, and R. E. Kingston. 1991. Activation domains of stably bound GAL4 derivative alleviate repression of promoters by nucleosomes. Cell 64:533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X.-J., V. V. Ogryzko, J. Nishikawa, B. H. Howard, and Y. Nakatani. 1996. A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Nature 382:319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga, S. K., C. L. Peterson, I. Herskowitz, and K. Yamamoto. 1992. Roles of SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 proteins for transcriptional enhancement by steroid receptors. Science 258:1598–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar