Sin Mutations of Histone H3: Influence on Nucleosome Core Structure and Function

References

• Almer, A., H. Rudolph, A. Hinnen, and W. Horz. 1986. Removal of positioned nucleosomes from the yeast PHO5 promoter upon PHO5 induction releases additional activating DNA elements. EMBO J. 5:2689–2696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almer, A., and W. Horz. 1986. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/ PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 5:2681–2688.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arents, G., R. W. Burlingame, B. W. Wang, W. E. Love, and E. N. Moudrianakis. 1991. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1Å resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10148–10152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arents, G., and E. N. Moudrianakis. 1993. Topography of the histone octamer surface: repeating structural motifs utilized in the docking of nucleosomal DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:10489–10493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlev, N. A., R. Candau, L. Wang, P. Darpino, N. Silverman, and S. L. Berger. 1995. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor ADA2 with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding-protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270:19337–19343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bashkin, J., J. J. Hayes, T. D. Tullius, and A. P. Wolffe. 1993. Structure of DNA in a nucleosome core at high salt concentration and at high temperature. Biochemistry 32:1895–1898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer, B. W., and D. Rhodes. 1983. Eukaryotic RNA polymerase II binds to nucleosome cores from transcribed genes. Nature (London) 301:482–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, W. R., J. J. Hayes, J. H. White, and A. P. Wolffe. 1994. Nucleosome structural changes due to acetylation. J. Mol. Biol. 236:685–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beato, M., P. Herrlich, and G. Schultz. 1995. Steroid hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot. Cell 83:851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, P. B. 1994. The establishment of active promoters in chromatin. Bioessays 16:541–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birkenmeier, E. H., D. D. Brown, and E. Jordan. 1978. A nuclear extract of Xenopus laevis oocytes that accurately transcribes 5S RNA genes. Cell 15:1077–1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, J. E., J. Zhou, T. Ranalli, R. Kobayashi, D. G. Edmondson, S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis. 1996. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84:843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhoff, A. M., and T. D. Tullius. 1988. Structural details of an adenine tract that does not cause DNA to bend. Nature (London) 331:455–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R., Y. J. Kim, M. H. Sayre, B. C. Laurent, and R. D. Kornberg. 1994. A multisubunit complex containing the SWIA/ADR6, SWI2/SNF2, SWI3/SNF5 and SNF6 gene products isolated from yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1950–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B. R., Y. Lorch, Y. Li, M. Zhang, L. Lacomis, H. Evdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, J. Du, B. Laurent, and R. D. Kornberg. 1996. RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87:1249–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerini-Otero, R. D., B. Sollner-Webb, and G. Felsenfeld. 1976. The organization of histones and DNA in chromatin: evidence for an argininerich histone kernel. Cell 8:333–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., and B. C. Laurent. 1994. The SNF/SWI family of global transcriptional activators. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:396–402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, D. J., and A. P. Wolffe. 1991. Superhelical stress and nucleosome mediated repression of 5S RNA gene transcription in vitro. EMBO J. 10:3419–3428.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark-Adams, C. D., D. Norris, M. A. Osley, J. S. Fassler, and F. Winston. 1988. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 2:150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté, J., J. Quinn, J. L. Workman, and C. L. Peterson. 1994. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science 265:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallas, P. B., P. Yaciuk, and E. Moran. 1997. Characterization of monoclonal antibodies raised against p300: both p300 and CBP are present in intracellular TBP complexes. J. Virol. 71:1726–1731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dong, F., and K. E. van Holde. 1991. Nucleosome positioning is determined by the (H3-H4)2 tetramer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10596–10600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, F., J. C. Hansen, and K. E. van Holde. 1989. DNA and protein determinants of nucleosome positioning on sea urchin 5S rRNA gene sequences in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:5724–5728.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. G., M. M. Smith, and S. Y. Roth. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickbusch, T. H., and E. N. Moudrianakis. 1978. The histone core complex: an octamer assembled by two sets of protein-protein interactions. Biochemistry 17:4955–4967.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fassler, J. S., and F. Winston. 1988. Isolation and analysis of a novel class of suppressor of Ty insertion mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 118:112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Adams, G., and M. Grunstein. 1995. Yeast histone H4 and H3 N-termini have different effects on the chromatin structure of the Gal1 promoter. EMBO J. 14:1468–1477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, L., H. Kurumizaka, and A. P. Wolffe. 1996. Functional domains for assembly of histones H3 and H4 into the chromatin of Xenopus embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:12780–12785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudreau, L., A. Schmid, D. Blaschke, M. Ptashne, and W. Horz. 1997. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme recruitment is sufficient to remodel chromatin at the yeast PHO5 promoter. Cell 89:55–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Germond, J. E., B. Hirt, P. Oudet, M. Gross-Bellard, and P. Chambon. 1975. Folding of the double helix in chromatin like structures from simian virus 40. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:1843–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godde, J. S., and A. P. Wolffe. 1995. Disruption of reconstituted nucleosomes: the effect of particle concentration MgCl2, and KCl concentration, the histone tails and temperature. J. Biol. Chem. 270:27399–27402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godde, J. S., Y. Nakatani, and A. P. Wolffe. 1995. The amino-terminal tails of the core histones and the translational position of the TATA box determine TBP/TFIIA association with nucleosomal DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4557–4564.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunstein, M., L. K. Durrin, R. K. Mann, G. Fisher-Adams, and L. M. Johnson. 1992. Histones: regulators of transcription in yeast, p. 1295–1315. In S. McKnight and K. Yamamoto (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Han, M., and M. Grunstein. 1988. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55:1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, M., U.-J. Kim, P. Kayne, and M. Grunstein. 1988. Depletion of histone H4 and nucleosomes activates the PHO5 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 7:2221–2228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hansen, J. C., and A. P. Wolffe. 1994. A role for histones H2A/H2B in chromatin folding and transcriptional repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2339–2343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes, J. J., and A. P. Wolffe. 1992. Histone H2A/H2B inhibit the interaction of TFIIIA with 5S DNA in a nucleosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:1229–1233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes, J. J., and A. P. Wolffe. 1993. Preferential and asymmetric interaction of linker histones with 5S DNA in the nucleosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6415–6419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayes, J. J., T. D. Tullius, and A. P. Wolffe. 1990. The structure of DNA in a nucleosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7405–7409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. J., D. J. Clark, and A. P. Wolffe. 1991. Histone contributions to the structure of DNA in the nucleosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:6829–6833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. J., J. Bashkin, T. D. Tullius, and A. P. Wolffe. 1991. The histone core exerts a dominant constraint on the structure of DNA in a nucleosome. Biochemistry 30:8434–8440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herskowitz, I., B. Andrews, W. Kruger, J. Ogas, A. Sil, C. Coburn, and C. Peterson. 1992. Integration of multiple regulatory inputs in the control of HO expression in yeast, p. 949–974. In S. McKnight and K. Yamamoto (ed.), vol. 2. Transcriptional regulation, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, J. N., S. A. Brown, C. D. Clark, and F. Winston. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 6:2288–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. M., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature 370:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. M., P. S. Kayne, E. S. Kahn, and M. Grunstein. 1990. Genetic evidence for an interaction between SIR3 and histone H4 in the repression of silent mating loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:6286–6290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karantza, V., E. Freire, and E. N. Moudrianakis. 1996. Thermodynamic studies of the core histones: pH and ionic strength effects on the stability of the (H3-H4)/(H3-H4)2 system. Biochemistry 35:2037–2046.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kayne, P. S., U. J. Kim, M. Han, J. R. Mullen, F. Yoshizaki, and M. Grunstein. 1988. Extremely conserved histone H4 N-terminus is dispensible for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast. Cell 55:27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khavari, P. A., C. L. Peterson, J. W. Tamkun, D. B. Mendel, and G. R. Crabtree. 1993. BRG1 contains a conserved domain of the SWI2/SNF2 family necessary for normal mitotic growth and transcription. Nature 366:170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, W., and I. Herskowitz. 1991. A negative regulator of HO transcription, SIN1 (SPT2), is a nonspecific DNA binding protein related to HMG1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:4135–4146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger, W., C. L. Peterson, A. Sil, C. Coburn, G. Arents, E. N. Moudrianakis, and I. Herskowitz. 1995. Amino acid substitutions in the structured domains of histones H3 and H4 partially relieve the requirement of the yeast SWI/SNF complex for transcription. Genes Dev. 9:2770–2779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., A. N. Imbalzano, P. A. Khavarl, R. E. Kingston, and M. R. Green. 1994. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SWI/SNF complex. Nature 370:477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberger, N., and A. P. Wolffe. 1995. The role of chromatin and Xenopus heat shock transcription factor (XHSF1) in the regulation of the Xenopus hsp70 promoter in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:6013–6024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landsberger, N., and A. P. Wolffe. 1997. Remodeling of regulatory nucleoprotein complexes during meiotic maturation of the Xenopus oocyte. EMBO J. 16:4361–4373.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurent, B. C., and M. Carlson. 1992. Yeast SNF2/SWI2, SNF5 and SNF6 proteins function coordinately with the gene-specific transcriptional activators Gal4 and bicoid. Genes Dev. 6:1707–1715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurent, B. C., I. Treich, and M. Carlson. 1993. The yeast SNF2/SWI2 protein has DNA stimulated ATPase activity required for transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 7:583–591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, D. Y., J. J. Hayes, D. Pruss, and A. P. Wolffe. 1993. A positive role for histone acetylation in transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA. Cell 72:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutter, L. 1978. Kinetic analysis of deoxyribonuclease I cleavage sites in the nucleosome core: evidence for a DNA superhelix. J. Mol. Biol. 124:391–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meersseman, G., S. Pennings, and E. M. Bradbury. 1991. Chromatosome positioning on assembled long chromatin: linker histones affect nucleosome placement on 5S DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 220:89–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meersseman, G., S. Pennings, and E. M. Bradbury. 1992. Mobile nucleo-somes-a general behavior. EMBO J. 11:2951–2959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizzen, C. A., X. J. Yang, T. Kobuko, J. E. Brownell, A. J. Banister, T. Owen-Hughes, J. Workman, S. L. Berger, T. Kouzarides, Y. Nakatani, and C. D. Allis. 1996. The TAFII250 subunit of TFIID has histone acetyltransferase activity. Cell 87:1261–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchardt, C., and M. Yaniv. 1993. A human homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF2/SWI2 and Drosophila brm genes potentiates transcriptional activation by the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 12:4279–4290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muchardt, C., C. Sardet, B. Bourachot, C. Onufryk, and M. Yaniv. 1995. A human protein with homology to S. cerevisiae SNF5 interacts with the potential helicase hbrm. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:1127–1132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neigeborn, L., K. Rubin, and H. Carlson. 1986. Suppressors of snf2 mutations restore invertase derepression and cause temperature sensitive lethality in yeast. Genetics 112:741–753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noll, M., and R. D. Kornberg. 1977. Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1. J. Mol. Biol. 109:393–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogryzko, V. V., R. L. Schiltz, V. Russanova, B. H. Howard, and Y. Nakatani. 1996. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 87:953–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M., G. H. Thomson, and R. G. Roeder. 1985. The nucleotide sequence and genomic organization of two distinct tandemly repeated Xenopus laevis histone gene clusters. J. Mol. Biol. 185:479–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., W. Kruger, and I. Herskowitz. 1991. A functional interaction between the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and the negative regulator SIN1. Cell 64:1135–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., and I. Herskowitz. 1992. Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2 and SWI3 genes which encode a global activator of transcription. Cell 68:573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., A. Dingwall, and M. P. Scott. 1994. SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2905–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., and J. W. Tamkun. 1995. The SWI/SNF complex: a chromatin remodeling machine? Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:143–146.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L. 1995. The SWI/SNF protein machine: helping transcription factors contend with chromatin-mediated repression. Nucleus 1:185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Pruss, D., and A. P. Wolffe. 1993. Histone-DNA contacts in a nucleosome core containing a Xenopus 5S rRNA gene. Biochemistry 32:6810–6814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pruss, D., J. J. Hayes, and A. P. Wolffe. 1995. Nucleosomal anatomy— where are the histones? Bioessays 17:161–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn, J., A. M. Fyrberg, R. W. Ganster, M. C. Schmidt, and C. L. Peterson. 1996. DNA-binding properties of the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Nature 379:844–847.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read, C. M., J. P. Baldwin, and C. Crane-Robinson. 1985. Structure of subnucleosomal particles tetrameric (H3/H4)2 146 base pair and hexameric (H3/H4)2 (H2A/H2B)1 146bp DNA complexes. Biochemistry 24:4435–4450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes, D. 1985. Structural analysis of a triple complex between the histone octamer, a Xenopus gene for 5S RNA and transcription factor IIIA. EMBO J. 4:3473–3482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S. Y., A. Dean, and R. T. Simpson. 1990. Yeast α2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:2247–2260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roth, S. Y., M. Shimizu, L. Johnson, M. Grunstein, and R. T. Simpson. 1992. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast α2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutation in histone H4. Genes Dev. 6:411–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, R. H., and G. Felsenfeld. 1979. A new procedure for purifying histone pairs H2A+H2B and H3+H4 from chromatin using hydroxylapatite. Nucleic Acids Res. 6:689–696.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, R. T., and D. W. Stafford. 1983. Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:51–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. T., F. Thoma, and J. M. Brubaker. 1985. Chromatin reconstituted from tandemly repeated cloned DNA fragments and core histones: a model system for study of higher order structure. Cell 42:799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svaren, J., and W. Horz. 1995. Interplay between nucleosomes and transcription factors at the yeast PHO5 promoter. Semin. Cell Biol. 6:177–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svaren, J., and W. Horz. 1996. Regulation of gene expression by nucleosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6:164–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taunton, J., C. A. Hassig, and S. L. Schreiber. 1996. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to a yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3. Science 272:408–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukiyama, T., P. B. Becker, and C. Wu. 1994. ATP-dependent nucleosome disruption at a heat-shock promoter mediated by binding of GAGA transcription factor. Nature 367:525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukiyama, T., and C. Wu. 1995. Purification and properties of an ATP dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell 83:1011–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullius, T. D., and B. A. Dombroski. 1985. Iron (II) EDTA used to measure the helical twist along any DNA molecule. Science 230:679–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ura, K., J. J. Hayes, and A. P. Wolffe. 1995. A positive role for nucleosome mobility in the transcriptional activity of chromatin templates: restriction by linker histones. EMBO J. 14:3752–3765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ura, K., K. Nightingale, and A. P. Wolffe. 1996. Differential association of HMG1 and linker histones B4 and H1 with dinucleosomal DNA: structural transitions and transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 15:4959–4969.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ura, K., H. Kurumizaka, S. Dimitrov, G. Almouzni, and A. P. Wolffe. 1997. Histone acetylation: influence on transcription by RNA polymerase, nucleosome mobility and positioning, and linker histone dependent transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 16:2096–2107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varga-Weisz, P. D., T. A. Blank, and P. B. Becker. 1995. Energy-dependent chromatin accessibility and nucleosome mobility in a cell free system. EMBO J. 14:2209–2216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vettese-Dadey, M., P. A. Grant, T. R. Hebbes, C. Crane-Robinson, C. D. Allis, and J. L. Workman. 1996. Acetylation of histone H4 plays a primary role in enhancing transcription factor binding to nucleosomal DNA in vitro. EMBO J. 15:2508–2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettesse-Dadey, M., P. Walter, H. Chen, L.-J. Juan, and J. L. Workman. 1994. Role of the histone amino termini in facilitated binding of a transcription factor, GAL4-AH, to nucleosome cores. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:970–981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal, M., R. Strich, R. E. Esposito, and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD1 (SIN3/ UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6306–6316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal, M., and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6317–6327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, G., P. D. Varga-Weisz, R. Sandaltzopoulos, and P. B. Becker. 1995. Chromatin remodeling by GAGA factor and heat shock factor at the hypersensitive Drosophila hsp26 promoter in vitro. EMBO J. 14:1727–1736.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, H., and D. J. Stillman. 1993. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1805–1814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, H., I. Clark, P. R. Nicholon, I. Herskowitz, and D. J. Stillman. 1990. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN3 gene a negative regulator of HO contains four paired amphipathic helix motifs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:5927–5936.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechser, M. A., M. P. Kladde, J. A. Alfieri, and C. L. Peterson. 1997. Effects of Sin versions of histone H4 on yeast chromatin structure and function. EMBO J. 16:2086–2095.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White, J. H., N. R. Cozzarelli, and W. R. Bauer. 1988. Helical repeat and linking number of surface wrapped DNA. Science 241:323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. J., D. M. Chao, A. N. Imbalzano, G. R. Schnitzer, R. Kingston, and R. A. Young. 1996. RNA polymerase II holoenzyme contains SWI/SNF regulators involved in chromatin remodeling. Cell 84:235–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, F., and M. Carlson. 1992. Yeast SNF/SWI transcriptional activators and the SPT/SIN chromatin connection. Trends Genet. 8:387–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P. 1994. Switched-on chromatin. Curr. Biol. 4:525–527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P. 1995. Chromatin: structure and function, 2nd ed. Academic Press, London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P., and J. J. Hayes. 1993. The analysis of transcription factor interactions with model nucleosomal templates. Methods Mol. Genet. 2:314–330.
   Google Scholar
• Wolffe, A. P., E. Jordan, and D. D. Brown. 1986. A bacteriophage RNA polymerase transcribes through a Xenopus 5S RNA gene transcription complex without disrupting it. Cell 44:381–389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worcel, A., S. Han, and M. L. Wong. 1978. Assembly of newly replicated chromatin. Cell 15:969–977.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wray, W., T. Boulikas, V. Wray, and R. Hancock. 1981. Silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 118:197–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X.-J., V. V. Ogryzko, J.-I. Nishikawa, B. Howard, and Y. Nakatani. 1996. A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral E1A oncoprotein. Nature 382:319–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshinaga, S. K., S. L. Peterson, I. Herskowitz, and K. R. Yamamoto. 1992. Roles of SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 proteins for transcriptional enhancement by steroid receptors. Science 258:1598–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar