Saccharomyces cerevisiae BUR6 Encodes a DRAP1/NC2α Homolog That Has both Positive and Negative Roles in Transcription In Vivo

REFERENCES

• Arents, G., R. W. Burlingame, B.-C. Wang, W. E. Love, and E. Moudrianakis. 1991. The nucleosomal core histone octamer at 3.1 Å resolution: a tripartite protein assembly and a left-handed superhelix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10148–10152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auble, D. T., and S. Hahn. 1993. An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA. Genes Dev. 7:844–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auble, D. T., K. E. Hansen, C. G. F. Mueller, W. S. Lane, J. Thorner, and S. Hahn. 1994. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 8:1920–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxevanis, A. D., G. Arents, E. N. Moudrianakis, and D. Landsman. 1995. A variety of DNA-binding and multimeric proteins contain the histone fold motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:2685–2691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortvin, A., and F. Winston. 1996. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 272:1473–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., and D. Botstein. 1982. Two differentially regulated mRNAs with different 5′ ends encode secreted and intracellular forms of yeast invertase. Cell 28:145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., R. W. West, Jr., S. L. Johnson, H. Gans, B. Kruger, and J. Ma. 1993. TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by a2 repressor and is identical to SIN4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:831–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, S., R. W. West, Jr., J. Ma, S. L. Johnson, H. Gans, and G. Woldehawariat. 1993. TSF1 to TSF6, required for silencing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes, are global regulatory genes. Genetics 134:701–716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark-Adams, C. D., D. Norris, M. A. Osley, J. S. Fassler, and F. Winston. 1988. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 2:150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collart, M. A. 1996. The NOT, SPT3, and MOT1 genes functionally interact to regulate transcription at core promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6668–6676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collart, M. A., and K. Struhl. 1993. CDC39, an essential nuclear protein that negatively regulates transcription and differentially affects the constitutive and inducible HIS3 promoters. EMBO J. 12:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote, J., J. Quinn, J. L. Workman, and C. L. Peterson. 1994. Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Science 265:53–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., R. Kunisawa, and J. Thorner. 1992. A presumptive helicase (MOT1 gene product) affects gene expression and is required for viability in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1879–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollard, C., S. L. Ricupero-Hovasse, G. Natsoulis, J. D. Boeke, and F. Winston. 1994. SPT10 and SPT21 are required for transcription of particular histone genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5223–5228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrin, L. K., R. K. Mann, and M. Grunstein. 1992. Nucleosome loss activates CUP1 and HIS3 promoters to fully induced levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1621–1629.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrin, L. K., R. K. Mann, P. S. Kayne, and M. Grunstein. 1991. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell 65:1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadbois, E. L., D. M. Chao, J. C. Reese, M. R. Green, and R. A. Young. TBP-associated negative regulator NC2 is a global repressor of class II genes in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Goppelt, A., and M. Meisterernst. 1996. Characterization of the basal inhibitor of class II transcription NC2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4450–4455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goppelt, A., G. Stelzer, F. Lottspeich, and M. Meisterernst. 1996. A mechanism for repression of class II gene transcription through specific binding of NC2 to TBP-promoter complexes via heteromeric histone fold domains. EMBO J. 15:3105–3116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunstein, M. 1990. Histone function in transcription. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 6:643–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han, M., and M. Grunstein. 1988. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55:1137–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, J., and F. Winston. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschhorn, J. N., S. A. Brown, C. D. Clark, and F. Winston. 1992. Evidence that SNF2/SWI2 and SNF5 activate transcription in yeast by altering chromatin structure. Genes Dev. 6:2288–2298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., H. Kwon, M. R. Green, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA. Nature (London) 370:481–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inostroza, J. A., F. H. Mermelstein, I. Ha, W. S. Lane, and D. Reinberg. 1992. Dr1, a TATA-binding protein-associated phosphoprotein and inhibitor of class II gene transcription. Cell 70:477–489.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irie, K., S. Nomoto, I. Miyajima, and K. Matsumoto. 1991. SGV1 encodes a CDC28/cdc2-related kinase required for a Gα subunit-mediated adaptive response to pheromone in S. cerevisiae. Cell 65:785–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, H., K. Fukuda, K. Murata, and A. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153:163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. W., and D. J. Stillman. 1992. Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:4503–4514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, A. D. 1995. Molecular mechanisms of cell-type determination in budding yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:552–558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, L. M., G. Fisher-Adams, and M. Grunstein. 1992. Identification of a non-basic domain in the histone H4 N-terminus required for repression of the yeast silent mating loci. EMBO J. 11:2201–2209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., J. G. Na, M. Hampsey, and D. Reinberg. 1997. The Dr1/DRAP1 heterodimer is a global repressor of transcription in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:820–825.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, T. K., Y. Zhao, G. Hui, R. Bernstein, and R. G. Roeder. 1995. TATA- binding protein residues implicated in a functional interplay between negative cofactor 2 (Dr1) and general factors TFIIA and TFIIB. J. Biol. Chem. 270:10976–10981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knezetic, J. A., and D. S. Luse. 1986. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell 45:95–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H., A. N. Imbalzano, P. A. Khavari, R. E. Kingston, and M. R. Green. 1994. Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex. Nature (London) 370:477–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, J., and F. Winston. 1997. Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malone, E. A., C. D. Clark, A. Chiang, and F. Winston. 1991. Mutations in SPT16/CDC68 suppress cis- and trans-acting mutations that affect promoter function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5710–5717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisterernst, M., and R. G. Roeder. 1991. Family of proteins that interact with TFIID and regulate promoter activity. Cell 67:557–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermelstein, F., K. Yeung, J. Cao, J. A. Inostroza, H. Erdjument-Bromage, K. Eagleson, D. Landsman, P. Levitt, P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg. 1996. Requirement of a corepressor for Dr1-mediated repression of transcription. Genes Dev. 10:1033–1048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, P. J., and R. Tjian. 1989. Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science 245:371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natsoulis, G., C. Dollard, F. Winston, and J. D. Boeke. 1991. The products of the SPT10 and SPT21 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae increase the amplitude of transcriptional regulation at a large number of unlinked loci. New Biol. 3:249–259.
   Google Scholar
• Neigeborn, L., and M. Carlson. 1984. Genes affecting the regulation of SUC2 gene expression by glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 108:845–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neigeborn, L., J. L. Celenza, and M. Carlson. 1987. SSN20 is an essential gene with mutant alleles that suppress defects in SUC2 transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:672–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, C. L., A. Dingwall, and M. P. Scott. 1994. Five SWI/SNF gene products are components of a large multisubunit complex required for transcriptional enhancement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2905–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, B., U. Bruggemeier, and M. Beato. 1990. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Cell 60:719–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelich, G. Unpublished results.
   Google Scholar
• Prelich, G., and F. Winston. 1993. Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo. Genetics 135:665–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rine, J., and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 116:9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., P. Novick, J. H. Thomas, D. Botstein, and G. R. Fink. 1987. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromerecontaining shuttle vector. Gene 60:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Sarokin, L., and M. Carlson. 1984. Upstream region required for regulated expression of the glucose-repressible SUC2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:2750–2757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, P. W., and M. A. Osley. 1991. Histone regulatory (hir) mutations suppress d insertion alleles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 128:729–738.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinha, S., I.-S. Kim, K.-Y. Sohn, B. de Crombrugghe, and S. Maity. 1996. Three classes of mutations in the A subunit of the CAAT-binding factor CBF delineate functional domains involved in the three-step assembly of the CBF-DNA complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:328–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternberg, P. W., M. J. Stern, I. Clark, and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Activation of the yeast HO gene by release from multiple negative controls. Cell 48:567–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhl, K. 1995. Yeast transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29:651–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, M. S., E. A. Malone, and F. Winston. 1991. SPT5, an essential gene important for normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes an acidic nuclear protein with a carboxy-terminal repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3009–3019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson, M. S., and F. Winston. 1992. SPT4, SPT5 and SPT6 interactions: effects on transcription and viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:325–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, I. C., J. L. Workman, T. J. Schuetz, and R. E. Kingston. 1991. Facilitated binding of GAL4 and heat shock factor to nucleosomal templates: differential function of DNA-binding domains. Genes Dev. 5:1285–1298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal, M., and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD3 encodes a second factor required to achieve maximum positive and negative transcriptional states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6306–6316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vidal, M., R. Strich, R. E. Esposito, and R. F. Gaber. 1991. RPD1 (SIN3/ UME4) is required for maximal activation and repression of diverse yeast genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6306–6316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, H., and D. J. Stillman. 1993. Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1805–1814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winston, F. 1992. Analysis of SPT genes: a genetic approach towards analysis of TFIID, histones and other transcription factors of yeast. In S. L. McKnight and K. R. Yamamoto (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, F., C. Dollard, and S. L. Ricupero-Hovasse. 1995. Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast 11:53–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., and R. G. Roeder. 1987. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 51:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, X., T. Kokubo, S. L. Cohen, U. A. Mirza, A. Hoffman, B. T. Chait, R. G. Roeder, Y. Nakatani, and S. K. Burley. 1996. Structural similarity between TAFs and the heterotetrameric core of the histone octamer. Nature (London) 380:316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawel, L., and D. Reinberg. 1993. Initiation of transcription by RNA polymerase II: a multi-step process. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 44:67–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar