Identification of RTF1, a Novel Gene Important for TATA Site Selection by TATA Box-Binding Protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

REFERENCES

• Arndt, K. M. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. L. Ricupero, D. M. Eisenmann, and F. Winston. 1992. Biochemical and genetic characterization of a yeast TFIID mutant that alters transcription in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:2372–2382.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., S. Ricupero-Hovasse, and F. Winston. 1995. TBP mutants defective in activated transcription in vivo. EMBO J. 14:1490–1497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., and F. Winston. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt, K. M., C. R. Wobbe, S. Ricupero-Hovasse, K. Struhl, and F. Winston. 1994. Equivalent mutations in the two repeats of yeast TATA-binding protein confer distinct TATA recognition specificities. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3719–3728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auble, D. T., and S. Hahn. 1993. An ATP-dependent inhibitor of TBP binding to DNA. Genes Dev. 7:844–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auble, D. T., K. E. Hansen, C. G. F. Mueller, W. S. Lane, J. Thorner, and S. Hahn. 1994. Mot1, a global repressor of RNA polymerase II transcription, inhibits TBP binding to DNA by an ATP-dependent mechanism. Genes Dev. 8:1920–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl. 1988. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience, New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Bortvin, A., and F. Winston. 1996. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 272:1473–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, S. K., and R. G. Roeder. 1996. Biochemistry and structural biology of transcription factor IID (TFIID). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65:769–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., and K. Struhl. 1995. Connecting a promoter-bound protein to TBP bypasses the need for a transcriptional activation domain. Nature 374:820–822.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, W., and K. Struhl. 1988. Saturation mutagenesis of a yeast his3 “TATA element”: genetic evidence for a specific TATA-binding protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2691–2695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, T., and M. Carey. 1996. Assembly of the isomerized TFIIA-TFIID-TATA ternary complex is necessary and sufficient for gene activation. Genes Dev. 10:2540–2550.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christianson, T. W., R. S. Sikorski, M. Dante, J. H. Shero, and P. Hieter. 1992. Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110:119–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Adams, C. D., D. Norris, M. A. Osley, J. S. Fassler, and F. Winston. 1988. Changes in histone gene dosage alter transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 2(2):150–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark-Adams, C. D., and F. Winston. 1987. The SPT6 gene is essential for growth and is required for d-mediated transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:679–686.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collart, M. A. 1996. The NOT, SPT3, and MOT1 genes functionally interact to regulate transcription at core promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6668–6676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormack, B. P., and K. Struhl. 1993. Regional codon randomization: defining a TATA-binding protein surface required for RNA polymerase III transcription. Science 262:244–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., K. M. Arndt, S. L. Ricupero, J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston. 1992. SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 6:1319–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, D. M., C. Chapon, S. M. Roberts, C. Dollard, and F. Winston. 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT8 gene encodes a very acidic protein that is functionally related to SPT3 and TATA-binding protein. Genetics 137:647–657.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gansheroff, L. J., C. Dollard, P. Tan, and F. Winston. 1995. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SPT7 gene encodes a very acidic protein important for transcription in vivo. Genetics 139:523–536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hahn, S., S. Buratowski, P. A. Sharp, and L. Guarente. 1989. Yeast TATA-binding protein TFIID binds to TATA elements with both consensus and nonconsensus DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:5718–5722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. N., L. Hereford, and I. Herskowitz. 1984. Targeting of E. coli b-galactosidase to the nucleus in yeast. Cell 36:1057–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. K., and R. Tjian. 1995. TAFs and TFIIA mediate differential utilization of the tandem Adh promoters. Cell 82:565–575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Happel, A. M., and F. Winston. 1992. A mutant tRNA affects d-mediated transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:361–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbury, P. A. B., and K. Struhl. 1989. Functional distinctions between yeast TATA elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:5298–5304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harlow, E., and D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, J. E., K. J. Durbin, and F. Winston. 1988. Genetic evidence for promoter competition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4608–4615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman, C. S., and F. Winston. 1987. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 57:267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, C., and K. M. Arndt. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Imbalzano, A. N., K. S. Zaret, and R. E. Kingston. 1994. Transcription factor (TF) IIB and TFIIA can independently increase the affinity of the TATA-binding protein for DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 269:8280–8286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlin, S. 1993. Unusual charge configurations in transcription factors of the basic RNA polymerase II initiation complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5593–5597.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, J. L., D. B. Nikolov, and S. K. Burley. 1993. Co-crystal structure of TBP recognizing the minor groove of a TATA element. Nature 365:520–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., J. H. Geiger, S. Hahn, and P. B. Sigler. 1993. Crystal structure of a yeast TBP/TATA-box complex. Nature 365:512–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klages, N., and M. Strubin. 1995. Stimulation of RNA polymerase II transcription initiation by recruitment of TBP in vivo. Nature 374:822–823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein, C., and K. Struhl. 1994. Increased recruitment of TATA-binding protein to the promoter by transcriptional activation domains in vivo. Science 266:280–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koleske, A. J., S. Buratowski, M. Nonet, and R. A. Young. 1992. A novel transcription factor reveals a functional link between the RNA polymerase II CTD and TFIID. Cell 69:883–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleske, A. J., and R. A. Young. 1995. The RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and its implications for gene regulation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:113–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kunkel, T. A., J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zabour. 1987. Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Methods Enzymol. 154:367–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and K. Struhl. 1995. Mutations on the DNA-binding surface of TATA-binding protein can specifically impair the response to acidic activators in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5461–5469.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lieberman, P. M., and A. J. Berk. 1994. A mechanism for TAFs in transcriptional activation: activation domain enhancement of TFIID-TFIIA-promoter DNA complex formation. Genes Dev. 8:995–1006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madison, J. M., and F. Winston. 1997. Evidence that Spt3 functionally interacts with Mot1, TFIIA, and TATA-binding protein to confer promoter-specific transcriptional control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:287–295.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nonet, M. L., and R. A. Young. 1989. Intragenic and extragenic suppressors of mutations in the heptapeptide repeat domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II. Genetics 123:715–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orphanides, G., T. Lagrange, and D. Reinberg. 1996. The general transcription factors of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 10:2657–2683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr-Weaver, T., J. W. Szostak, and R. Rothstein. 1983. Genetic applications of yeast transformation with linear and gapped plasmids. Methods Enzymol. 101:228–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.-O., J. Chant, and I. Herskowitz. 1993. BUD2 encodes a GTPaseactivating protein for Bud1/Rsr1 necessary for proper bud-site selection in yeast. Nature 365:269–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, C. L. 1996. Multiple SWItches to turn on chromatin? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6:171–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pringle, J. R., R. A. Preston, A. E. M. Adams, T. Stearns, D. G. Drubin, B. K. Haarer, and E. W. Jones. 1989. Fluorescence microscopy methods for yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 31:357–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riles, L., and M. V. Olson. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. M., and F. Winston. 1996. SPT20/ADA5 encodes a novel protein functionally related to the TATA-binding protein and important for transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3206–3213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roeder, R. G. 1996. The role of general initiation factors in transcription by RNA polymerase II. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., P. Novick, J. H. Thomas, D. Botstein, and G. R. Fink. 1987. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomic plasmid bank based on a centromerecontaining shuttle vector. Gene 60:237–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics: a laboratory course manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. J. 1983. One-step gene disruption in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 101:202–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, S., and R. W. Davis. 1979. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4951–4955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simchen, G., F. Winston, C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1984. Ty-mediated gene expression of the LYS2 and HIS4 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the same SPT genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:2431–2434.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stargell, L. A., and K. Struhl. 1995. The TBP-TFIIA interaction in the response to acidic activators in vivo. Science 269:75–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stolinski, L. A., and K. M. Arndt. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Strubin, M., and K. Struhl. 1992. Yeast and human TFIID with altered DNA-binding specificity for TATA elements. Cell 68:721–730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun, Z.-W., and M. Hampsey. 1995. Identification of the gene (SSU71/TFG1) encoding the largest subunit of transcription factor TFIIF as a suppressor of a TFIIB mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:3127–3131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Z.-W., A. Tessmer, and M. Hampsey. 1996. Functional interaction between TFIIB and the Rpb9 (Ssu73) subunit of RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2560–2566.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swanson, M. S., E. A. Malone, and F. Winston. 1991. SPT5, an essential gene important for normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encodes an acidic nuclear protein with a carboxy-terminal repeat. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:3009–3019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyers, M., G. Tokiwa, R. Nash, and B. Futcher. 1992. The Cln3-Cdc28 kinase complex of S. cerevisiae is regulated by proteolysis and phosphorylation. EMBO J. 11:1773–1784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verrijzer, C. P., J.-L. Chen, K. Yokomori, and R. Tjian. 1995. Binding of TAFs to core elements directs promoter selectivity by RNA polymerase II. Cell 81:1115–1125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winston, F. 1992. Analysis of SPT genes: a genetic approach toward analysis of TFIID, histones and other transcription factors of yeast. In S. L. McKnight and K. R. Yamamoto (ed.), Transcriptional regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Winston, F., C. Dollard, and S. Ricupero-Hovasse. 1995. Construction of a set of convenient S. cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C. Yeast 11:53–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L., and R. G. Roeder. 1987. Binding of transcription factor TFIID to the major late promoter during in vitro nucleosome assembly potentiates subsequent initiation by RNA polymerase II. Cell 51:613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., J. D. Friesen, and J. T. Lis. 1995. Recruiting TATA-binding protein to a promoter: transcriptional activation without an upstream activator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5757–5761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamoto, T., M. Horikoshi, J. Wang, S. Hasegawa, P. A. Weil, and R. G. Roeder. 1992. A bipartite DNA binding domain composed of direct repeats in the TATA box binding factor TFIID. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:2844–2848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yokomori, K., M. P. Zeidler, J.-L. Chen, C. P. Verrijzer, M. Mlodzik, and R. Tjian. 1994. Drosophila TFIIA directs cooperative DNA binding with TBP and mediates transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 8:2313–2323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar