Point Mutations in the WD40 Domain of Eed Block Its Interaction with Ezh2

REFERENCES

• Abel, K. J., L. C. Brody, J. M. Vlades, M. R. Erdos, D. R. McKinley, L. H. Castilla, S. D. Merajver, F. J. Couch, L. S. Friedman, E. A. Ostermeyer, E. D. Lynch, M.-C. King, P. L. Welcsh, S. Osborne-Lawrence, M. Spillman, A. M. Bowcock, F. S. Collins, and B. L. Weber 1996. Characterization of EZH1, a human homolog of Drosophila Enhancer of zeste near BRCA1. Genomics 37: 161–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bird, T. A., H. Schule, P. B. Delaney, J. E. Sims, B. Thoma, and S. K. Dower 1992. Evidence that MAP (mitogen-activated protein) kinase activation may be a necessary but not sufficient signal for a restricted subset of responses in IL-1-treated epidermoid cells. Cytokine 4: 429–440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bomsztyk, K., I. Van Seuningen, H. Suzuki, O. Denisenko, and J. Ostrowski 1997. Diverse molecular interactions of the hnRNP K protein. FEBS Lett. 403: 113–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burd, C. G., and G. Dreyfuss 1994. Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins. Science 265: 615–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, E. A., and R. S. Jones 1996. The Drosophila Enhancer of zeste gene encodes a chromatin protein: examination of wild-type and mutant protein distribution. Development 122: 4073–4083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, H., C. Rossier, and S. E. Antonarakis 1996. Cloning of a human homolog of the Drosophila Enhancer of zeste gene (EZH2) that maps to the chromosome 21q22.2. Genomics 38: 30–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi 1987. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162: 156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denisenko, O. N., and K. Bomsztyk 1997. The product of the murine homolog of the Drosophila extra sex comb gene displays transcriptional repressor activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 4707–4717.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denisenko, O. N., and K. Bomsztyk. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Eissenberg, J. C., T. C. James, D. M. Foster-Harnett, T. Harnett, T. Ngan, and S. C. R. Elgin 1990. Mutation in a heterochromatin-specific chromosomal protein is associated with suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 9923–9927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, S., and O. Song 1989. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340: 245–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, M., and B. S. Baker 1989. Genes controlling essential cell-cycle functions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 3: 438–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillis, S., and J. Watson 1980. Biochemical and biological characterization of lymphocyte regulatory molecules. V. Identification of an interleukin 2-producing human leukemia T cell line. J. Exp. Med. 152: 1709–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunster, M., D. Satijn, K. Hamer, J. den Blaauwen, D. de Bruijn, M. Alkema, M. van Lohuizen, R. van Driel, and A. Otte 1997. Identification and characterization of interactions between the vertebrate polycomb-group protein BMI1 and human homologs of polyhomeotic. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 2326–2335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurevich, V. V., I. D. Pokrovskaya, T. A. Obukhova, and S. A. Zozulya 1991. Preparative in vitro mRNA synthesis using SP6 and T7 RNA polymerase. Anal. Biochem. 195: 207–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutjahr, T., E. Frei, C. Spicer, S. Baumgartner, R. A. H. White, and M. Noll 1995. The polycomb-group gene, extra sex combs, encodes a nuclear member of the WD-40 repeat family. EMBO J. 14: 4296–4306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hobert, O., I. Sures, T. Ciossek, M. Fuchs, and A. Ullrich 1996. Isolation and developmental expression analysis of Enx-1, a novel mouse Polycomb group gene. Mech. Dev. 55: 171–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ito, N., S. E. Phillips, C. Stevens, Z. B. Ogel, M. J. McPherson, J. N. Keen, K. D. Yadav, and P. F. Knowles 1991. Novel thioether bond revealed by a 1.7 A crystal structure of galactose oxidase. Nature 350: 87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. J., H. Iida, C. E. Alpers, M. W. Majesky, S. M. Schwartz, P. Pritzl, K. Gordon, and A. M. Gwon 1991. Expression of smooth muscle cell phenotype by rat mesangial cells in immune complex nephritis: α-smooth muscle actin is a marker of mesangial cell proliferation. J. Clin. Invest. 87: 847–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. A., J. Ng, A. J. Peterson, K. Morgan, J. Simon, and R. S. Jones 1998. The Drosophila esc and E(z) proteins are direct partners in polycomb group-mediated repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 2825–2834.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, R. S., and W. M. Gelbart 1993. The Drosophila Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste contains a region with sequence similarity to trithorax. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 6357–6366.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, R. S., and W. M. Gelbart 1990. Genetic analysis of the enhancer of zeste locus and its role in gene regulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126: 185–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalisch, W. E., and B. Rasmuson 1974. Changes of zeste phenotype induced by autosomal mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 78: 97–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kluxen, F. W., and H. Lubbert 1993. Maximal expression of recombinant cDNAs in COS cells for use in expression cloning. Anal. Biochem. 208: 352–356.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laible, G., A. Wolf, R. Dorn, G. Reuter, C. Nislow, A. Lebersorger, D. Popkin, L. Pillus, and T. Jenuwein 1997. Mammalian homologues of the Polycomb-group gene Enhancer of zeste mediate gene silencing in Drosophila heterochromatin and at S. cerevisiae telomeres. EMBO J. 16: 3219–3232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaJeunesse, D., and A. Shearn 1996. E(z): a polycomb group gene or a trithorax group gene? Development 122: 2189–2197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambright, D. G., J. Sondek, A. Bohm, N. P. Skiba, H. E. Hamm, and P. B. Sigler 1996. The 2.0 A crystal structure of a heterotrimeric G protein. Nature 379: 311–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J., M. A. Kotarski, and K. D. Tartof 1988. Dosage-dependent modofiers of position effect variegation in Drosophila and a mass action model that explains their effect. Genetics 120: 181–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCall, K., and W. Bender 1996. Probes for chromatin accessibility in the Drosophila bithorax complex respond differently to Polycomb-mediated repression. EMBO J. 15: 569–580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng, J., R. Li, K. Morgan, and J. Simon 1997. Evolutionary conservation and predicted structure of the Drosophila extra sex combs repressor protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 6663–6672.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paige, C. J., P. W. Kincaide, and P. Ralph 1978. Murine B cell leukemia line with inducible surface immunoglobulin expression. J. Immunol. 121: 641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paro, R. 1990. Imprinting the determined state into the chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Trends Genet. 6: 416–421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paro, R., S. Messmer, Moehrle, V. Orlando, and D. Zink 1993. Regulation of stable gene expression at the higher-order chromatin level. Genetics and the Understanding of Life. 17th International Congress of Genetics, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, M. D., and A. Shearn 1990. Mutations in polycombeotic, a Drosophila polycomb-group gene, cause a wide range of maternal and zygotic phenotypes. Genetics 125: 91–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirrotta, V. 1995. Chromatin complexes regulating gene expression in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5: 466–472.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirrotta, V. 1997. PcG complexes and chromatin silencing. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 7: 249–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platero, J. S., E. J. Sharp, P. N. Adler, and J. C. Eissenberg 1996. In vivo assay for protein-protein interactions using Drosophila chromosomes. Chromosoma 104: 393–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rachie, N. A., R. Seger, M. A. Valentine, J. Ostrowski, and K. Bomsztyk 1993. Identification of an inducible 85-kDa nuclear protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 22143–22149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rastelli, L., C. S. Chen, and V. Pirrotta 1993. Related chromosome binding sites for zeste, suppressors of zeste and Polycomb group proteins in Drosophila and their dependence on Enhancer of zeste function. EMBO J. 12: 1513–1522.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter, G., M. Giarre, J. Farah, J. Gausz, A. Spierer, and P. Spierer 1990. Dependence of position-effect variegation in Drosophila on dose of a gene encoding an unusual zinc-finger protein. Nature 344: 219–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reuter, G., and P. Spierer 1992. Position effect variegation and chromatin structure. Bioessays 14: 605–612.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, C. A., K. L. Gordon, W. G. Couser, and K. Bomsztyk 1995. IL-1β increases laminin B2 chain mRNA levels and activates NF-κB in rat glomerular epithelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 268: F273–F278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadowski, I., and M. Ptashne 1989. A vector for expressing GAL4 (1-147) fusions in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 17: 7539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathe, S. S., and P. J. Harte 1995. The Drosophila extra sex combs protein contains WD motifs essential for its function as a repressor of homeotic genes. Mech. Dev. 52: 77–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sathe, S. S., and P. J. Harte 1995. The extra sex combs protein is highly conserved between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila melanogaster. Mech. Dev. 52: 225–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumacher, A., C. Faust, and T. Magnuson 1996. Positional cloning of a global regulator of anterior-posterior patterning in mice. Nature 383: 250–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sewalt, R. G. A. B., J. van der Vlag, M. J. Gunster, K. M. Hamer, J. L. den Blaauwen, D. P. E. Satijn, T. Hendrix, R. van Driel, and A. P. Otte 1998. Characterization of interaction between the mammalian Polycomb-group proteins Enx1/Ezh2 and Eed suggests the existence of different mammalian Polycomb-group protein complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 3586–3595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J. 1995. Locking in stable states of gene expression: transcriptional control during Drosophila development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7: 376–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J., D. Bornemann, K. Lunde, and C. Schwartz 1995. The extra sex combs product contains WD40 repeats and its time of action implies a role distinct from other Polycomb group products. Mech. Dev. 53: 197–208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J., A. Chiang, W. Bender, M. J. Shimell, and M. O’Connor 1993. Elements of the Drosophila bithorax complex that mediate repression by Polycomb group products. Development 158: 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. B. 1994. Molecular mechanisms of cellular determination: their relation to chromatin structure and parental imprinting. J. Cell Sci. 107: 2653–2668.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struhl, G. 1981. A gene product required for correct initiation of segmental determination in Drosophila. Nature 293: 36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhl, G. 1983. Role of the esc+ gene product in ensuring the selective expression of segment-specific homeotic genes in Drosophila. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 76: 297–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struhl, G., and D. Brower 1992. Early role of the esc+ gene product in the determination of segments in Drosophila. Cell 31: 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Tschiersch, B., A. Hofmann, V. Krauss, R. Dorn, G. Korge, and G. Reuter 1994. The protein encoded by the Drosophila position-effect variegation suppressor gene Su(var)3-9 combines domains of antagonistic regulators of homeotic gene complexes. EMBO J. 13: 3822–3831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lohuizen, M., M. Tijms, J. W. Voncken, A. Schumacher, T. Magnuson, and E. Wientjens 1998. Interaction of mouse Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins Enx1 and Enx2 with Eed: indication for separate PcG complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 3572–3579.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vojtek, A. B., S. M. Hollenberg, and J. A. Cooper 1993. Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf. Cell 74: 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. A. H., and R. Lehmann 1986. A gap gene, hunchback, regulates the spatial expression of Ultrabithorax. Cell 47: 311–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, C.-C., and M. Bienz 1992. Segmental determination in Drosophila conferred by hunchback (hb), a repressor of the homeotic gene Ultrabothorax (Ubx). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 7511–7515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar