Mismatch Repair Proteins Regulate Heteroduplex Formation during Mitotic Recombination in Yeast

REFERENCES

• Abdulkarim, F., and D. Hughes 1996. Homologous recombination between the tuf genes of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Mol. Biol. 260: 506–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, B.-Y., and D. M. Livingston 1986. Mitotic gene conversion lengths, coconversion patterns, and the incidence of reciprocal recombination in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6: 3685–3693.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alani, E., R. A. G. Reenan, and R. D. Kolodner 1994. Interaction between mismatch repair and genetic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 137: 19–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailis, A. M., and R. Rothstein 1990. A defect in mismatch repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae stimulates ectopic recombination between homeologous genes by an excision repair-dependent process. Genetics 126: 535–547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bayliss, A., M. Hendrix, J. McDougal, S. Jinks-Robertson, and G. Crouse. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Borts, R. H., and J. E. Haber 1987. Meiotic recombination in yeast: alteration by multiple heterozygosities. Science 237: 1459–1465.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borts, R. H., W.-Y. Leung, W. Kramer, B. Kramer, M. Williamson, S. Fogel, and J. E. Haber 1990. Mismatch repair-induced meiotic recombination requires PMS1 gene product. Genetics 124: 573–584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambers, S. R., N. Hunter, E. J. Louis, and R. H. Borts 1996. The mismatch repair system reduces meiotic homeologous recombination and stimulates recombination-dependent chromosome loss. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 6110–6120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chernoff, Y. O., O. V. Kidgotko, O. Demberelijn, I. L. Luchnikova, S. P. Soldatov, V. M. Glazer, and D. A. Gordenin 1984. Mitotic intragenic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces: marker-effects on conversion and reciprocity of recombination. Curr. Genet. 9: 31–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciotta, C., S. Ceccotti, G. Aquilina, O. Humbert, F. Palombo, J. Jiricny, and M. Bignami 1998. Increased somatic recombination in methylation-tolerant human cells with defective DNA mismatch repair. J. Mol. Biol. 276: 705–719.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claverys, J.-P., and S. A. Lacks 1986. Heteroduplex deoxyribonucleic acid base mismatch repair in bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 50: 133–165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crouse, G. F. Mismatch repair systems in Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage and repair In: Nickoloff, J. A., and M. F. Hoekstra 1998. 1. DNA repair in prokaryotes and lower eukaryotes, 411–448Humana Press, Totowa, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, A., A. Adjiri, L. New, G. F. Crouse, and S. Jinks-Robertson 1996. Mitotic crossovers between diverged sequences are regulated by mismatch repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 1085–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, A., M. Hendrix, M. Lipsitch, and S. Jinks-Robertson 1997. Dual roles for DNA sequence identity and the mismatch repair system in the regulation of mitotic crossing-over in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9757–9762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wind, N., M. Dekker, A. Berns, M. Radman, and H. te Riele 1995. Inactivation of the mouse Msh2 gene results in mismatch repair deficiency, methylation tolerance, hyperrecombination, and predisposition to cancer. Cell 82: 321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, B., C. Richardson, J. Winderbaum, J. A. Nickoloff, and M. Jasin 1998. Gene conversion tracts from double-strand break repair in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, S. I., and K. B. Low 1986. Hyper-recombining recipient strains in bacterial conjugation. Genetics 113: 13–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gangloff, S., H. Zou, and R. Rothstein 1996. Gene conversion plays the major role in controlling the stability of large tandem repeats in yeast. EMBO J. 15: 1715–1725.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geitz, D., A. St. Jean, R. A. Woods, and R. H. Schiestl 1992. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 20: 1425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habraken, Y., P. Sung, L. Prakash, and S. Prakash 1997. Enhancement of MSH2-MSH3-mediated mismatch recognition by the yeast MLH1-PMS1 complex. Curr. Biol. 7: 790–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S., K. S. Rudnicki, and J. E. Haber 1993. Gene conversions and crossing over during homologous and homeologous ectopic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 135: 5–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman, C. S., and F. Winston 1987. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 57: 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbert, O., M. Prudhomme, R. Hakenbeck, C. G. Dowson, and J.-P. Claverys 1995. Homeologous recombination and mismatch repair during transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae: saturation of the Hex mismatch repair system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 9052–9056.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunter, N., and R. H. Borts 1997. Mlh1 is unique among mismatch repair proteins in its ability to promote crossing-over during meiosis. Genes Dev. 11: 1573–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, N., S. R. Chambers, E. J. Louis, and R. H. Borts 1996. The mismatch repair system contributes to meiotic sterility in an interspecific yeast hybrid. EMBO J. 15: 1726–1733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jinks-Robertson, S., and T. D. Petes 1986. Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes. Genetics 114: 731–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, S. R., and T. D. Petes 1988. Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 118: 401–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lichten, M., and J. E. Haber 1989. Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 123: 261–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majewski, J., and F. M. Cohan 1998. The effect of mismatch repair and heteroduplex formation on sexual isolation in Bacillus. Genetics 148: 13–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matic, I., C. Rayssiguier, and M. Radman 1995. Interspecies gene exchange in bacteria: the role of SOS and mismatch repair systems in evolution of species. Cell 80: 507–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDougal, J., and S. Jinks-Robertson. Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Mezard, C., D. Pompon, and A. Nicolas 1992. Recombination between similar but not identical DNA sequences during yeast transformation occurs within short stretches of identity. Cell 70: 659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrich, P., and R. Lahue 1996. Mismatch repair in replication fidelity, genetic recombination and cancer biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65: 101–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negritto, M. T., X. Wu, T. Kuo, S. Chu, and A. M. Bailis 1997. Influence of DNA sequence identity on efficiency of targeted gene replacement. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 278–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson-Tillgren, T., C. Gjermansen, S. Holmberg, M. C. L. Petersen, and M. C. Kielland-Brandt 1986. Analysis of chromosome V and the ILV1 gene from Saccharomyces calsbergensis. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 51: 309–326.
   Google Scholar
• Petes, T. D., R. E. Malone, and L. S. Symington 1991. Recombination in yeast The molecular biology of the yeast Saccharomyces: genome dynamics, protein synthesis and energetics. In: Broach, J. R., J. R. Pringle, and E. W. Jones407–521Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G., J. Westmoreland, S. Priebe, and M. A. Resnick 1996. Homologous and homeologous intermolecular gene conversion are not differentially affected by mutations in the DNA damage or mismatch repair genes RAD1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, PMS1 and MSH2. Genetics 143: 755–767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priebe, S. D., J. Westmoreland, T. Nilsson-Tillgren, and M. A. Resnick 1994. Induction of recombination between homologous and diverged DNAs by double-strand gaps and breaks and role of mismatch repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 4802–4814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Radman, M. 1988. Mismatch repair and genetic recombination Genetic recombination. In: Kucherlapati, R., and G. R. Smith169–192American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Radman, M. 1991. Avoidance of inter-repeat recombination by sequence divergence and a mechanism of neutral evolution. Biochimie 73: 357–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayssiguier, C., D. S. Thaler, and M. Radman 1989. The barrier to recombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature 342: 396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M. A., Z. Zgaga, P. Hieter, J. Westmoreland, S. Fogel, and T. Nilsson-Tillgren 1992. Recombinational repair of diverged DNAs: a study of homeologous chromosomes and mammalian YACs in yeast. Mol. Gen. Genet. 234: 65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ronne, H., and R. Rothstein 1988. Mitotic sectored colonies: evidence of heteroduplex DNA formation during direct repeat recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 2695–2700.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., C. Helms, and N. Rosenberg 1987. Concerted deletions and inversions are caused by mitotic recombination between delta sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7: 1198–1207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selva, E. M., A. B. Maderazo, and R. S. Lahue 1997. Differential effects of the mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MSH3 on homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257: 71–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selva, E. M., L. New, G. F. Crouse, and R. S. Lahue 1995. Mismatch correction acts as a barrier to homeologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 139: 1175–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, P., and H. V. Huang 1986. Homologous recombination in Escherichia coli: dependence on substrate length and homology. Genetics 112: 441–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, P., and H. V. Huang 1989. Effect of base pair mismatches on recombination via the RecBCD pathway. Mol. Gen. Genet. 218: 358–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugawara, N., F. Paques, M. Colaiacovo, and J. E. Haber 1997. Role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 and Msh3 repair proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9214–9219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supply, P., A. de Kerchove D’Exaerde, T. Roganti, A. Goffeau, and F. Foury 1995. In-frame recombination between the yeast H+-ATPase isogenes PMA1 and PMA2: insights into the mechanism of recombination initiated by a double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 5389–5395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweetser, D. B., H. Hough, J. Wheldon, M. Arbuckle, and J. A. Nickoloff 1994. Fine-resolution mapping of spontaneous and double-strand break-induced gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals reversible mitotic conversion polarity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 3863–3875.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vincent, A., and T. D. Petes 1989. Mitotic and meiotic gene conversion of Ty elements and other insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 759–772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vulic, M., F. Dionisio, F. Taddei, and M. Radman 1997. Molecular keys to speciation: DNA polymorphism and the control of genetic exchange in enterobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9763–9767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waldman, A. S., and R. M. Liskay 1987. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 5340–5344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westmoreland, J., G. Porter, M. Radman, and M. A. Resnick 1997. Highly mismatched molecules resembling recombination intermediates efficiently transform mismatch repair proficient Escherichia coli. Genetics 145: 29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K. K., and H. L. Klein 1987. Intrachromosomal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: reciprocal exchange in an inverted repeat and associated gene conversion. Genetics 117: 633–643.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Worth, L.Jr., S. Clark, M. Radman, and P. Modrich 1994. Mismatch repair proteins MutS and MutL inhibit RecA-catalyzed strand transfer between diverged DNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3238–3241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, D., and A. S. Waldman 1997. Fine-resolution analysis of products of intrachromosomal homeologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 3614–3628.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahrt, T. C., and S. Maloy 1997. Barriers to recombination between closely related bacteria: MutS and RecBCD inhibit recombination between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 9786–9791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahrt, T. C., G. C. Mora, and S. Maloy 1994. Inactivation of mismatch repair overcomes the barrier to transduction between Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi. J. Bacteriol. 176: 1527–1529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zawadzki, P., M. S. Roberts, and F. M. Cohan 1995. The log-linear relationship between sexual isolation and sequence divergence in Bacillus transformation is robust. Genetics 140: 917–932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar