Bub1p Kinase Activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spindle Assembly Checkpoint

REFERENCES

• Byers, B., and L. Goetsch 1991. Preparation of yeast cells for thin-section electron microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 194: 602–608.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, R., J. C. Waters, E. D. Salmon, and A. W. Murray 1996. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 274: 242–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dougherty, C., and M. A. Hoyt. Unpublished observations.
   Google Scholar
• Elledge, S. J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science 274: 1664–1672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, K. A., and M. A. Hoyt. Unpublished observations.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, K. A., C. Dougherty, and M. A. Hoyt. Unpublished observations.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, J. R., E. J. Schott, T. J. Kingsbury, N. B. Cole, L. J. Totis, G. Bhattacharyya, L. He, and M. A. Hoyt 1997. S. cerevisiae genes required in the absence of the CIN8-encoded spindle motor act in functionally diverse mitotic pathways. Mol. Biol. Cell 8: 1035–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks, S. K., and T. Hunter 1995. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 9: 576–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardwick, K. G., and A. W. Murray 1995. Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 131: 709–720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardwick, K. G., E. Weiss, F. C. Luca, M. Winey, and A. W. Murray. 1996. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. 273:953–956.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H., and M. B. Kastan 1994. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science 266: 1821–1828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H., and T. A. Weinert 1989. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246: 629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, M. A., L. Totis, and B. T. Roberts 1991. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66: 507–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, K. J., and H. E. Eipel 1978. Flow cytometric determinations of cellular substances in algae, bacteria, molds and yeast. Antonie Leeuwenhoek J. Microbiol. Serol. 44: 269–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, R. W., R. J. Deshaies, J. Peters, and M. W. Kirschner 1996. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science 274: 1652–1659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. W., P. K. Jackson, and M. W. Kirschner 1994. Mitosis in transition. Cell 79: 563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauzé, E., B. Stoelcker, F. C. Luca, E. Weiss, A. R. Schutz, and M. Winey 1995. Yeast spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 encodes an essential dual specificity protein kinase. EMBO J. 14: 1655–1663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, R., and A. W. Murray 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66: 519–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and R. Benezra 1996. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 274: 246–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklas, R. B. 1997. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275: 623–637.
   Google Scholar
• Pangilinan, F., and F. Spencer 1996. Abnormal kinetochore structure activates the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 7: 1195–1208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pringle, J. R., A. E. M. Adams, D. G. Drubin, and B. K. Haarer 1991. Immunofluorescence methods for yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194: 565–602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts, B. T., K. A. Farr, and M. A. Hoyt 1994. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 8282–8291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudner, A. D., and A. W. Murray 1996. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8: 773–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, F., G. R. Fink, and J. B. Hicks 1983. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Sherr, C. J. 1996. Cancer cell cycles. Science 274: 1672–1677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and J. D. Boeke 1991. In vitro mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast. Methods Enzymol. 194: 302–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straight, A., A. Belmont, C. C. Robinett, and A. W. Murray 1996. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6: 1599–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S., and F. McKeon 1997. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89: 725–735.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and D. J. Burke 1995. Checkpoint genes required to delay cell division in response to nocodazole respond to impaired kinetochore function in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 6838–6844.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss, E., and M. Winey 1996. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Spindle Pole Body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 132: 111–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, W. A. E. 1996. The spindle-assembly checkpoint: aiming for a perfect mitosis, every time. Trends Cell Biol. 6: 228–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winey, M., L. Goetsch, P. Baum, and B. Byers 1991. MPS1 and MPS2: novel yeast genes defining distinct steps of Spindle Pole Body duplication. J. Cell Biol. 114: 745–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar