dCtBP-Dependent and -Independent Repression Activities of the Drosophila Knirps Protein

REFERENCES

• Amendt, B. A., Sutherland, L. B., and Russo, A. F.. 1999. Multifunctional role of the Pitx2 homeodomain protein C-terminal tail. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7001–7010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnosti, D. N., Gray, S., Barolo, S., Zhou, J., and Levine, M.. 1996. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 15:3659–3666
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aronson, B. D., Fisher, A. L., Blechman, K., Caudy, M., and Gergen, J. P.. 1997. Groucho-dependent and -independent repression activities of Runt domain proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5581–5587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baleja, J. D., Marmorstein, R., Harrison, S. C., and Wagner, G.. 1992. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of Cd2-GAL4 from S. cerevisiae. Nature 356:450–453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barolo, S., and Levine, M.. 1997. hairy mediates dominant repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 16:2883–2891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannon, M., Brown, J. D., Bates, R., Kimelman, D., and Moon, R. T.. 1999. XCtBP is a XTcf-3 co-repressor with roles throughout Xenopus development. Development 126:3159–3170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, H. N., Arnosti, D. N., and Levine, M.. 1996. Long-range repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9309–9314
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey, M., Lin, Y. S., Green, M. R., and Ptashne, M.. 1990. A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives. Nature 345:361–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavallo, R. A., Cox, R. T., Moline, M. M., Roose, J., Polevoy, G. A., Clevers, H., Peifer, M., and Bejsovec, A.. 1998. Drosophila Tcf and Groucho interact to repress Wingless signalling activity. Nature 395:604–608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. K., Kuhnlein, R. P., Eulenberg, K. G., Vincent, S., Affolter, M., and Schuh, R.. 1998. The transcription factors KNIRPS and KNIRPS RELATED control cell migration and branch morphogenesis during Drosophila tracheal development. Development 125:4959–4968
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou, T. B., and Perrimon, N.. 1996. The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144:1673–1679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criqui-Filipe, P., Ducret, C., Maira, S. M., and Wasylyk, B.. 1999. Net, a negative Ras-switchable TCF, contains a second inhibition domain, the CID, that mediates repression through interactions with CtBP and de-acetylation. EMBO J. 18:3392–3403
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furusawa, T., Moribe, H., Kondoh, H., and Higashi, Y.. 1999. Identification of CtBP1 and CtBP2 as corepressors of zinc finger-homeodomain factor δEF1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:8581–8590
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerwin, N., La Rosee, A., Sauer, F., Halbritter, H. P., Neumann, M., Jäckle, H., and Nauber, U.. 1994. Functional and conserved domains of the Drosophila transcription factor encoded by the segmentation gene knirps. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7899–7908
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goetz, T. L., Gu, T. L., Speck, N. A., and Graves, B. J.. 2000. Auto-inhibition of Ets-1 is counteracted by DNA binding cooperativity with core-binding factor alpha2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:81–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., Szymanski, P., and Levine, M.. 1994. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8:1829–1838
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., Cai, H., Barolo, S., and Levine, M.. 1995. Transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349:257–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., and Levine, M.. 1996. Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10:700–710
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., and Levine, M.. 1996. Transcriptional repression in development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:358–364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu, T. L., Goetz, T. L., Graves, B. J., and Speck, N. A.. 2000. Auto-inhibition and partner proteins, core-binding factor beta (CBFbeta) and Ets-1, modulate DNA binding by CBFalpha2 (AML1). Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:91–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna-Rose, W., Licht, J. D., and Hansen, U.. 1997. Two evolutionarily conserved repression domains in the Drosophila Krüppel protein differ in activator specificity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4820–4829
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hewitt, G. F., Strunk, B. S., Margulies, C., Priputin, T., Wang, X. D., Amey, R., Pabst, B. A., Kosman, D., Reinitz, J., and Arnosti, D. N.. 1999. Transcriptional repression by the Drosophila Giant protein: cis element positioning provides an alternative means of interpreting an effector gradient. Development 126:1201–1210
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai, S.-I., Armstrong, C. M., Kaeberlein, M., and Guarente, L.. 2000. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature 403:795–800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes, J. B., and O'Farrell, P. H.. 1991. Active repression of transcription by the engrailed homeodomain protein. EMBO J. 10:1427–1433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jimenez, G., Paroush, Z., and Ish-Horowicz, D.. 1997. Groucho acts as a corepressor for a subset of negative regulators, including Hairy and Engrailed. Genes Dev. 11:3072–3082
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonsen, M. D., Petersen, J. M., Xu, Q. P., and Graves, B. J.. 1996. Characterization of the cooperative function of inhibitory sequences in Ets-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:2065–2073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirov, N., Childs, S., O'Connor, M., and Rushlow, C.. 1994. The Drosophila dorsal morphogen represses the tolloid gene by interacting with a silencer element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:713–722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosman, D., and Small, S.. 1997. Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps. Development 124:1343–1354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langeland, J. A., and Carroll, S. B.. 1993. Conservation of regulatory elements controlling hairy pair-rule stripe formation. Development 117:585–596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Rosée-Borggreve, A., Häder, T., Wainwright, D., Sauer, F., and Jäckle, H.. 1999. hairy stripe 7 element mediates activation and repression in response to different domains and levels of Krüppel in the Drosophila embryo. Mech. Dev. 89:133–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim, F., Kraut, N., Framptom, J., and Graf, T.. 1992. DNA binding by c-Ets-1, but not v-Ets, is repressed by an intramolecular mechanism. EMBO J. 11:643–652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunde, K., Biehs, B., Nauber, U., and Bier, E.. 1998. The knirps and knirps-related genes organize development of the second wing vein in Drosophila. Development 125:4145–4154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mannervik, M., and Levine, M.. 1999. The Rpd3 histone deacetylase is required for segmentation of the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:6797–6801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, A. R., Smith, E. J., and Nevins, J. R.. 1999. A mechanism for Rb/p130-mediated transcription repression involving recruitment of the CtBP corepressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9574–9579
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nauber, U., Pankratz, M. J., Kienlin, A., Seifert, E., Klemm, U., and Jäckle, H.. 1988. Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps. Nature 336:489–492
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., Zhang, H., Bajor, E., Barolo, S., Small, S., and Levine, M.. 1998. dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 17:7009–7020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., Zhang, H., and Levine, M.. 1998. Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo. Science 280:101–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nüsslein-Volhard, C., and Wieschaus, E.. 1980. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795–801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrimon, N., Lanjuin, A., Arnold, C., and Noll, E.. 1996. Zygotic lethal mutations with maternal effect phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Loci on the second and third chromosomes identified by P-element-induced mutations. Genetics 144:1681–1692
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poortinga, G., Watanabe, M., and Parkhurst, S. M.. 1998. Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and Hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 17:2067–2078
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postigo, A. A., and Dean, D. C.. 1999. Independent repressor domains in ZEB regulate muscle and T-cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7961–7971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Pomar, R., and Jäckle, H.. 1996. From gradients to stripes in Drosophila embryogenesis: filling in the gaps. Trends Genet. 12:478–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeper, U., Boyd, J. M., Verma, S., Uhlmann, E., Subramanian, T., and Chinnadurai, G.. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10467–10471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewalt, R. G., Gunster, M. J., van der Vlag, J., Satijn, D. P., and Otte, A. P.. 1999. C-terminal binding protein is a transcriptional repressor that interacts with a specific class of vertebrate Polycomb proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:777–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, S.. Mechanisms of segmental pattern formation in Drosophila melanogaster Reproductive biology of invertebrates Adiyodi, K. G., and Adiyodi, R. G. VII:137–178 John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y
   Google Scholar
• Small, S., Blair, A., and Levine, M.. 1992. 1997. Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 11:4047–4057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, S., Blair, A., and Levine, M.. 1996. Regulation of two pair-rule stripes by a single enhancer in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 175:314–324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., Sollerbrant, K., and Svensson, C.. 1998. The carboxy-terminal region of adenovirus E1A activates transcription through targeting of a C-terminal binding protein-histone deacetylase complex. FEBS Lett. 429:183–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanny, J. C., Dowd, G. J., Huang, J., Hilz, H., and Moazed, D.. 1999. An enzymatic activity in the yeast Sir2 protein that is essential for gene silencing. Cell 99:735–745
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolkunova, E. N., Fujioka, M., Kobayashi, M., Deka, D., and Jaynes, J. B.. 1998. Two distinct types of repression domain in engrailed: one interacts with the groucho corepressor and is preferentially active on integrated target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2804–2814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triezenberg, S. J.. 1995. Structure and function of transcriptional activation domains. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:190–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., and Crossley, M.. 1998. Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co-repressor that associates with basic Kruppel-like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators. EMBO J. 17:5129–5140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, K. A.Jr., and Crews, S. T.. 1993. CNS midline enhancers of the Drosophila slit and Toll genes. Mech. Dev. 40:141–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R. A., and Lehmann, R.. 1986. A gap gene, hunchback, regulates the spatial expression of Ultrabithorax. Cell 47:311–321
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, H., and Levine, M.. 1999. Groucho and dCtBP mediate separate pathways of transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:535–540
   PubMedGoogle Scholar