Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors

REFERENCES

• Alani, E., L. Cao, and N. Kleckner. 1987. A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains. Genetics 116:541–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allard, S., R. T. Utley, J. Savard, A. Clarke, P. Grant, C. J. Brandl, L. Pillus, J. L. Workman, and J. Cote. 1999. NuA4, an essential transcription adaptor/histone H4 acetyltransferase complex containing Esalp and the ATF-related cofactor Tralp. EMBO J. 18:5108–5119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allfrey, V., R. M. Faulkner, and A. E. Mirsky. 1964. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51:786–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein, M., A. B. Rose, S. G. Holmes, C. D. Allis, and J. R. Broach. 1993. Transcriptional silencing in yeast is associated with reduced nucleosome acetylation. Genes Dev. 7:592–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunstein, M., R. E. Sobel, C. D. Allis, B. M. Turner, and J. R. Broach. 1996. Efficient transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a heterochromatin histone acetylation pattern. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4349–4356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresnick, E. H., S. John, D. S. Berard, P. LeFebvre, and G. L. Hager. 1990. Glucocorticoid receptor-dependent disruption of a specific nucleosome on the MMTV promoter is prevented by sodium butyrate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3977–3981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bresnick, E. H., S. John, and G. L. Hager. 1991. Histone hyperacetylation does not alter the position or stability of phased nucleosomes on the MMTV LTR. Biochemistry 30:3490–3497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, H., R. J. Lin, W. Xie, D. Wilpitz, and R. M. Evans. 1999. Regulation of hormone-induced histone hyperacetylation and gene activation via acetylation of an acetylase. Cell 98:675–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. S., J. E. Lowell, S. J. Jacobson, and L. Pillus. 1999. Esalp is an essential histone acetyltransferase required for cell cycle progression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:2515–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosma, M. P., T. Tanaka, and K. Nasmyth. 1999. Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter. Cell 97:299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane-Robinson, C., T. R. Hebbes, A. L. Clayton, and A. W. Thorne. 1997. Chromosomal mapping of core histone acetylation by immunoselection. Methods 12:48–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drysdale, C. M., E. Duenas, B. M. Jackson, U. Reusser, G. H. Braus, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 1995. The transcriptional activator GCN4 contains multiple activation domains that are critically dependent on hydrophobic amino acids. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1220–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drysdale, C. M., B. M. Jackson, E. R. Klebanow, Y. Bai, T. Kokubo, M. Swanson, Y. Nakatani, A. Weil, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 1998. The Gcn4p activation domain interacts specifically in vitro with RNA polymerase II holoenzyme, TFIID, and the Adap-Gcn5p coactivator complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1711–1724.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ducker, C. E., and R. T. Simpson. 2000. The organized chromatin domain of the repressed yeast a cell-specific gene STE6 contains two molecules of the corepressor Tup1p per nucleosome. EMBO J. 19:400–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrin, L. K., R. K. Mann, P. S. Kayne, and M. Grunstein. 1991. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell 65:1023–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. G., M. M. Smith, and S. Y. Roth. 1996. Repression domain of the yeast global repressor TUP1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4. Genes Dev. 10:1247–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. G., W. Zhang, A. Watson, W. Xu, J. R. Bone, Y. Yu, D. Stillman, and S. Y. Roth. 1998. In vivo functions of histone acetylation/deacetylation in Tup1p repression and Gen5p activation. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 63:459–468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisen, A., W. E. Taylor, H. Blumberg, and E. T. Young. 1988. The yeast regulatory protein ADR1 binds in a zinc-dependent manner to the upstream activating sequence of ADH2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4552–4556.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Furst, P., S. Hu, R. Hackett, and D. Hamer. 1988. Copper activates metallothionein gene transcription by altering the conformation of a specific DNA binding protein. Cell 55:705–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, P. A., L. Duggan, J. Cote, S. M. Roberts, J. E. Brownell, R. Candau, R. Ohba, T. Owen-Hughes, C. D. Allis, F. Winston, S. L. Berger, and J. L. Workman. 1997. Yeast Gen5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11:1640–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D. S., C. C. Adams, S. Lee, and B. Stentz. 1993. A critical role for the heat shock transcription factor in establishing a nucleosome-free region over the TATA-initiation site of the yeast HSP82 heat shock gene. EMBO J. 12:3931–3945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grunstein, M.. 1997. Histone acetylation in chromatin structure and transcription. Nature 389:349–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, W., P. Szauter, and J. C. Lucchesi. 1998. Targeting of MOF, a putative histone acetyl transferase, to the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Genet. 22:56–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hebbes, T. R., A. W. Thorne, and C. Crane-Robinson. 1988. A direct link between core histone acetylation and transcriptionally active chromatin. EMBO J. 7:1395–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, L., G. P. Schroth, H. R. Matthews, P. Yau, and E. M. Bradbury. 1993. Studies of the DNA binding properties of histone H4 amino terminus: thermal denaturation studies reveal that acetylation markedly reduces the binding constant of the H4 “tail” to DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 268:305–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda, K., D. J. Steger, A. Eberharter, and J. L. Workman. 1999. Activation domain-specific and general transcription stimulation by native histone acetyltransferase complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:855–863.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai, S.-I., C. M. Armstrong, M. Kaeberlein, and L. Guarente. 2000. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature 403:795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, V., and K. Struhl. 1995. Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:7059–7066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeppesen, P., and B. M. Turner. 1993. The inactive X chromsosome in female mammals is distinguished by a lack of histone H4 acetylation, a cytogenetic marker for gene expression. Cell 74:281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1998. Histone deacetylase activity of Rpd3 is important for transcriptional repression in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:797–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadosh, D., and K. Struhl. 1998. Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5121–5127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg, R. D., and Y. Lorch. 1999. Chromatin-modifying and -remodeling complexes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:148–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzarides, T.. 1999. Histone acetylases and deacetylases in cell proliferation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, J. E., C. J. Fry, M. L. Samuels, and C. L. Peterson. 2000. Global role for chromatin remodeling enzymes in mitotic gene expression. Cell 102:587–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, J. E., M.-H. Kuo, C. D. Allis, and C. L. Peterson. 1999. Cell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene. Genes Dev. 13:1412–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M.-H., E. vom Baur, K. Struhl, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Gcn4 activator targets Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase to specific promoters independently of transcription. Mol. Cell 6:1309–1320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo, M.-H., J. Zhou, P. Jambeck, M. E. A. Churchill, and C. D. Allis. 1998. Histone acetyltransferase activity of yeast Gen5p is required for the activation of target genes in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:627–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras, L., H. Cherest, Y. Surdin-Kerjan, and D. Thomas. 1996. A heteromeric complex containing the centromere binding factor 1 and two basic leucine zipper factors, Met4 and Met28, mediates the transcription activation of yeast sulfur metabolism. EMBO J. 15:2519–2529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuras, L., and K. Struhl. 1999. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 389:609–612.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X.-L., A. Virbasius, X. Zhu, and M. R. Green. 1999. Enhancement of TBP binding by activators and general transcription factors. Nature 389:605–609.
   Google Scholar
• Lucchesi, J. C.. 1998. Dosage compensation in files and worms: the ups and downs of X-chromosome regulation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8:179–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luger, K., A. W. Mader, R. K. Richmond, D. F. Sargent, and T. J. Richmond. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 angstrom resolution. Nature 389:251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, X., S. Chou, and K. Struhl. 2000. Preferential accessibility of the yeast his3 promoter is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence, not by specific elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6668–6676.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mann, R. K., and M. Grunstein. 1992. Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo. EMBO J. 11:3297–3306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukai, Y., E. Matsuo, S. Y. Roth, and S. Harashima. 1999. Conservation of histone binding and transcriptional repressor functions in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe Tup1 homolog. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:8461–8468.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers, C. A., C. Schmidhauser, G. Fragoso, J. Mellentin-Michelotti, G. F. Casperson, P. Pujuguet, G. L. Hager, and M. J. Bissell. 1998. Characterization of BCE-1: a transcriptional enhancer regulated by prolactin and extracellular matrix and modulated by the state of histone acetylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2184–2195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natarajan, K., B. M. Jackson, H. Zhou, F. Winston, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 1999. Transcriptional activation by Gcn4 involves independent interactions with the Swi/Snf complex and the Srb/mediator. Mol. Cell 4:657–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, J. T., and L. Guarente. 1990. The HAP2 subunit of yeast CCAAT transcriptional activator contains adjacent domains for subunit association and DNA recognition: model for the HAP2/3/4 complex. Genes Dev. 4:1714–1729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Neill, L. P., and B. M. Turner. 1995. Histone H4 acetylation distinguishes coding regions of the human genome from heterochromatin in a differentiation-dependent but transcription-independent manner. EMBO J. 14:3946–3957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh, B. S., and T. Maniatis. 1999. Virus infection leads to localized hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 at the IFN-b promoter. Mol. Cell 3:125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogo, B. G. T., V. G. Allfrey, and A. E. Mirsky. 1966. RNA synthesis and histone acetylation during the course of gene activation in lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55:805–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. L., V. R. Iyer, P. O. Brown, and K. Struhl. 2000. Coordinate regulation of yeast ribosomal protein genes is associated with targeted recruitment of Esa1 histone acetylase. Mol. Cell 6:1297–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, R. Kobayashi, S. Bavykin, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1996. HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14503–14508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, N. Suka, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392:831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. L., and A. D. Johnson. 2000. Turning genes off by Ssn6-Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:325–330.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis. 2000. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahl-Bolsinger, S., A. Hecht, K. Luo, and M. Grunstein. 1997. SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 11:83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhl, K.. 1998. Histone acetylation and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Genes Dev. 12:599–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treger, J. M., A. P. Schmitt, J. R. Simon, and K. McEntee. 1998. Transcriptional factor mutations reveal regulatory complexities of heat shock and newly identified stress genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26875–26879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, B. M., A. J. Birley, and J. Lavender. 1992. Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell 69:375–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzamarias, D., and K. Struhl. 1994. Functional dissection of the yeast Cyc8-Tup1 transcriptional corepressor complex. Nature 369:758–761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tzamarias, D., and K. Struhl. 1995. Distinct TPR motifs of Cyc8 are involved in recruiting the Cyc8-Tup1 co-repressor complex to differentially regulated promoters. Genes Dev. 9:821–831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Utley, R. T., K. Ikeda, P. A. Grant, J. Cote, D. J. Steger, A. Eberharter, S. John, and J. L. Workman. 1998. Transcriptional activators direct histone acetyltransferase complexes to nucleosomes. Nature 394:498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelauer, M., J. Wu, N. Suka, and M. Grunstein. 2000. Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nature 408:495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L., L. Liu, and S. L. Berger. 1998. Critical residues for histone acetylation by Gen5, functioning in Ada and SAGA complexes, are also required for transcriptional function in vivo. Genes Dev. 12:640–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterborg, J. H.. 2000. Steady-state levels of histone acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13007–13011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, A. D., D. G. Edmondson, J. R. Bone, Y. Mukai, Y. Yu, W. Du, D. J. Stillman, and S. Y. Roth. 2000. Ssn6-Tupl interacts with class I histone deacetylases required for repression. Genes Dev. 14:2737–2744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrick, J. J., F. C. P. Holstege, E. G. Jennings, H. C. Causton, D. Shore, M. Grunstein, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Young. 1999. Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast. Nature 402:418–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., J. R. Bone, D. G. Edmondson, B. M. Turner, and S. Y. Roth. 1998. Essential and redundant functions of histone acetylation revealed by mutation of target lysines and loss of the Gcn5p acetyltransferase. EMBO J. 17:3155–3167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H., and D. J. Eide. 1997. Zaplp, a metalloregulatory protein involved in zinc-responsive transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5044–5052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar