CtBP-Independent Repression in the Drosophila Embryo

REFERENCES

• Arnosti, D. N., S. Gray, S. Barolo, J. Zhou, and M. Levine. 1996. The gap protein knirps mediates both quenching and direct repression in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 15: 3659–3666.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyd, J. M., T. Subramanian, U. Schaeper, M. La Regina, S. Bayley, and G. Chinnadurai. 1993. A region in the C-terminus of adenovirus 2/5 E1a protein is required for association with a cellular phosphoprotein and important for the negative modulation of T24-ras mediated transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis. EMBO J. 12: 469–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, T. B., and N. Perrimon. 1996. The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1673–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gateff, E., L. Gissmann, R. Shrestha, N. Plus, H. Pfister, J. Schroeder, and H. Zur Hausen. 1980. Characterization of two tumorous blood cell lines of Drosophila melanogaster and the viruses they contain, p. 517–533. In E. Kurstak, K. Maramarosch, and A. Dubendorfer (ed.), Invertebrate systems in vitro. Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gaul, U., and H. Jackle. 1989. Analysis of maternal effect mutant combinations elucidates regulation and function of the overlap of hunchback and Kruppel gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo. Development 107: 651–662.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., P. Szymanski, and M. Levine. 1994. Short-range repression permits multiple enhancers to function autonomously within a complex promoter. Genes Dev. 8: 1829–1838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., H. Cai, S. Barolo, and M. Levine. 1995. Transcriptional repression in the Drosophila embryo. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349: 257–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., and M. Levine. 1996. Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 10: 700–710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gray, S., and M. Levine. 1996. Transcriptional repression in development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8: 358–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ip, Y. T., R. Kraut, M. Levine, and C. A. Rushlow. 1991. The dorsal morphogen is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that interacts with a long-range repression element in Drosophila. Cell 64: 439–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ip, Y. T., R. E. Park, D. Kosman, E. Bier, and M. Levine. 1992. The dorsal gradient morphogen regulates stripes of rhomboid expression in the presumptive neuroectoderm of the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 6: 1728–1739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., D. Kosman, Y. T. Ip, and M. Levine. 1991. The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 5: 1881–1891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, S. A., Y. Mao, P. Struffi, C. Margulies, C. E. Yurk, A. R. Anderson, R. L. Amey, S. Moore, J. M. Ebels, K. Foley, M. Corado, and D. N. Arnosti. 2000. dCtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of the Drosophila Knirps protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 7247–7258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, H., K. Johnson, and A. Laughon. 2001. Repression of dpp targets by binding of brinker to Smad sites. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 18216–18222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Rosee, A., T. Häder, H. Taubert, R. Rivera-Pomar, and H. Jäckle. 1997. Mechanism and Bicoid-dependent control of hairy stripe 7 expression in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 16: 4403–4411.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Rosee-Borggreve, A., T. Häder, D. Wainwright, F. Sauer, and H. Jäckle. 1999. hairy stripe 7 element mediates activation and repression in response to different domains and levels of Krüppel in the Drosophila embryo. Mech. Dev. 89: 133–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Licht, J. D., W. Hanna-Rose, J. C. Reddy, M. A. English, M. Ro, M. Grossel, R. Shaknovich, and U. Hansen. 1994. Mapping and mutagenesis of the amino-terminal transcriptional repression domain of the Drosophila Krüppel protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14: 4057–4066.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malik, S., and R. G. Roeder. 2000. Transcriptional regulation through Mediator-like coactivators in yeast and metazoan cells. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannervik, M., Y. Nibu, H. Zhang, and M. Levine. 1999. Transcriptional coregulators in development. Science 284: 606–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, and M. Levine. 1998. Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo. Science 280: 101–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, E. Bajor, S. Barolo, S. Small, and M. Levine. 1998. dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Krüppel, and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 17: 7009–7020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nibu, Y., H. Zhang, and M. Levine. 2001. Local action of long-range repressors in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 20: 2246–2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, G., M. Watanabe, and S. M. Parkhurst. 1998. Drosophila CtBP: a Hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 17: 2067–2078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ptashne, M., and A. Gann. 2001. Genes and signals. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Redemann, N., U. Gaul, and H. Jackle. 1988. Disruption of a putative Cys-zinc interaction eliminates the biological activity of the Kruppel finger protein. Nature 332: 90–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rio, D. C., and G. M. Rubin. 1985. Transformation of cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells with a dominant selectable marker. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5: 1833–1838.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubin, G. M., and A. C. Spradling. 1982. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218: 348–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rundlett, S. E., A. A. Carmen, N. Suka, B. M. Turner, and M. Grunstein. 1998. Transcriptional repression by UME6 involves deacetylation of lysine 5 of histone H4 by RPD3. Nature 392: 831–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushlow, C., P. F. Colosimo, M. C. Lin, M. Xu, and N. Kirov. 2001. Transcriptional regulation of the Drosophila gene zen by competing Smad and Brinker inputs. Genes Dev. 15: 340–351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saller, E., and M. Bienz. 2001. Direct competition between Brinker and Drosophila Mad in Dpp target gene transcription. EMBO Rep. 2: 298–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaeper, U., J. M. Boyd, S. Verma, E. Uhlmann, T. Subramanian, and G. Chinnadurai. 1995. Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 10467–10471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, S., R. Kraut, T. Hoey, R. Warrior, and M. Levine. 1991. Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 5: 827–839.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Small, S., A. Blair, and M. Levine. 1992. Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 11: 4047–4057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, S., D. N. Arnosti, and M. Levine. 1993. Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter. Development 119: 767–772.
   Google Scholar
• Small, S., A. Blair, and M. Levine. 1996. Regulation of two pair-rule stripes by a single enhancer in the Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 175: 314–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sollerbrant, K., G. Chinnadurai, and C. Svensson. 1996. The CtBP binding domain in the adenovirus E1A protein controls CR1-dependent transactivation. Nucleic Acids Res. 24: 2578–2584.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanojevic, D., T. Hoey, and M. Levine. 1989. Sequence-specific DNA-binding activities of the gap proteins encoded by hunchback and Krüppel in Drosophila. Nature 341: 331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thummel, C. S., A. M. Boulet, and H. D. Lipshitz. 1988. Vectors for Drosophila P-element-mediated transformation and tissue culture transfection. Gene 74: 445–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woychik, N. A., and M. Hampsey. 2002. The RNA polymerase II machinery: structure illuminates function. Cell 108: 453–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, R., S. Small, C. Desplan, C. R. Dearolf, and J. E. Darnell, Jr. 1996. Identification of a Stat gene that functions in Drosophila development. Cell 84: 421–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. D., W. Piston, and R. H. Goodman. 2002. Regulation of corepressor function by nuclear NADH. Science 295: 895–897.
   Google Scholar