Collaborative Competition Mechanism for Gene Activation In Vivo

REFERENCES

• Adams, C. C., and J. L. Workman. 1995. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 1405–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, G., H.-U. Mosch, B. Hoffmann, U. Reusser, and G. H. Braus. 1998. Monitoring the Gcn4 protein-mediated response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 12696–12702.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, J. D., A. Thastrom, and J. Widom. 2002. Spontaneous access of proteins to buried nucleosomal DNA target sites occurs via a mechanism that is distinct from nucleosome translocation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 7147–7157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, F. M., R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl (ed.). 1989. Current protocols in molecular biology. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P. B., and W. Horz. 2002. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71: 247–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birchler, J. A., U. Bhadra, M. P. Bhadra, and D. L. Auger. 2001. Dosage-dependent gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes: implications for dosage compensation, aneuploid syndromes, and quantitative traits. Dev. Biol. 234: 275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., S. Tabor, and K. Struhl. 1987. Distinguishing between mechanisms of eukaryotic transcriptional activation with bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. Cell 50: 1047–1055.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Church, G. M., and W. Gilbert. 1984. Genomic sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 1991–1995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D'Elia, A. V., G. Tell, I. Paron, L. Pellizzari, R. Lonigro, and G. Damante. 2001. Missense mutations of human homeoboxes: a review. Hum. Mutat. 18: 361–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gari, E., L. Piedrafita, M. Aldea, and E. Herrero. 1997. A set of vectors with a tetracycline-regulatable promoter system for modulated gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 837–848.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgakopoulos, T., and G. Thireos. 1992. Two distinct yeast transcriptional activators require the function of the GCN5 protein to promote normal levels of transcription. EMBO J. 11: 4145–4152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, H., Y. Fukada, K. Murata, and A. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153: 163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, T., M. E. Levenstein, D. V. Fyodorov, A. K. Kutach, R. Kobayashi, and J. T. Kadonaga. 1999. ACF consists of two subunits, Acf1 and ISWI, that function cooperatively in the ATP-dependent catalysis of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 13: 1529–1539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, V., and K. Struhl. 1995. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 14: 2570–2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katan-Khaykovich, Y., and K. Struhl. 2002. Dynamics of global histone acetylation and deacetylation in vivo: rapid restoration of normal histone acetylation status upon removal of activators and repressors. Genes Dev. 16: 743–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, N. A., N. Karabetsou, P. K. Politis, and J. Mellor. 2001. In vivo chromatin remodeling by yeast ISWI homologs Isw1p and Isw2p. Genes Dev. 15: 619–626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kornberg, R. D., and L. Stryer. 1988. Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 16: 6677–6690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M. H., E. vom Baur, K. Struhl, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Gcn4 activator targets Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase to specific promoters independently of transcription. Mol. Cell 6: 1309–1320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuras, L., and K. Struhl. 1999. Binding of TBP to promoters in vivo is stimulated by activators and requires Pol II holoenzyme. Nature 399: 609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langst, G., and P. B. Becker. 2001. Nucleosome mobilization and positioning by ISWI-containing chromatin-remodeling factors. J. Cell Sci. 114: 2561–2568.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewis, L. K., G. R. Harlow, L. A. Gregg-Jolly, and D. W. Mount. 1994. Identification of high affinity binding sites for LexA which define new DNA damage-inducible genes in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 241: 507–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowary, P. T., and J. Widom. 1989. Higher-order structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 8266–8270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowary, P. T., and J. Widom. 1997. Nucleosome packaging and nucleosome positioning of genomic DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 1183–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniatis, T., E. F. Fritsch, and J. Sambrook. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Merika, M., and D. Thanos. 2001. Enhanceosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11: 205–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, J. M., W. Horz, and S. Holmberg. 2002. Neither Reb1p nor poly(dA:dT) elements are responsible for the highly specific chromatin organization at the ILV1 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 3202–3209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosch, H.-U., R. Graf, T. Schmidheini, and G. Braus. 1990. Three GCN4 responsive elements act synergistically as upstream and as TATA-like elements in the yeast TRP4 promoter. EMBO J. 9: 2951–2957.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Natarajan, K., B. M. Jackson, H. Zhou, F. Winston, and A. G. Hinnebusch. 1999. Transcriptional activation by Gcn4p involves independent interactions with the SWI/SNF complex and the SRB/mediator. Mol. Cell 4: 657–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, K. E., A. H. Hassan, A. E. Wallberg, D. J. Steger, B. R. Cairns, A. P. Wright, and J. L. Workman. 1999. Activation domain-mediated targeting of the SWI/SNF complex to promoters stimulates transcription from nucleosome arrays. Mol. Cell 4: 649–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliviero, S., and K. Struhl. 1991. Synergistic transcriptional enhancement does not depend on the number of acidic activation domains bound to the promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 224–228.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polach, K. J., and J. Widom. 1995. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 254: 130–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach, K. J., and J. Widom. 1996. A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 800–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach, K. J., and J. Widom. 1999. Restriction enzymes as probes of nucleosome stability and dynamics. Methods Enzymol. 304: 278–298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabbitts, T. H. 2001. Chromosomal translocation master genes, mouse models and experimental therapeutics. Oncogene 20: 5763–5777.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves, R., and L. Beckerbauer. 2001. HMGI/Y proteins: flexible regulators of transcription and chromatin structure. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1519: 13–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinberg, D., G. Orphanides, R. Ebright, S. Akoulitchev, J. Carcamo, H. Cho, P. Cortes, R. Drapkin, O. Flores, I. Ha, J. A. Inostroza, S. Kim, T. K. Kim, P. Kumar, T. Lagrange, G. LeRoy, H. Lu, D. M. Ma, E. Maldonado, A. Merino, F. Mermelstein, I. Olave, M. Sheldon, R. Shiekhattar, L. Zawel, et al. 1998. The RNA polymerase II general transcription factors: past, present, and future. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 63: 83–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan, M. P., R. Jones, and R. H. Morse. 1998. SWI-SNF complex participation in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to activator binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 1774–1782.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sellers, J. W., A. C. Vincent, and K. Struhl. 1990. Mutations that define the optimal half-site for binding yeast GCN4 activator protein and identify an ATF/CREB-like repressor that recognizes similar DNA sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10: 5077–5086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepley, D. P., and J. W. Little. 1996. Mutant LexA proteins with specific defects in autodigestion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 11528–11533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122: 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahl-Bolsinger, S., A. Hecht, K. Luo, and M. Grunstein. 1997. SIR2 and SIR4 interactions differ in core and extended telomeric heterochromatin in yeast. Genes Dev. 11: 83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhl, K., W. Chen, D. E. Hill, I. A. Hope, and M. A. Oettinger. 1985. Constitutive and coordinately regulated transcription of yeast genes: promoter elements, positive and negative regulatory sites, and DNA binding proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 50: 489–503.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struhl, K., and R. W. Davis. 1981. Transcription of the his3 gene region in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 152: 535–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syntichaki, P., I. Topalidou, and G. Thireos. 2000. The Gcn5 bromodomain coordinates nucleosome remodelling. Nature 404: 414–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. 1996. Modulation of promoter occupancy by cooperative DNA binding and activation-domain function is a major determinant of transcriptional regulation by activators in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 4311–4315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thastrom, A., P. T. Lowary, H. R. Widlund, H. Cao, M. Kubista, and J. Widom. 1999. Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 288: 213–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukiyama, T., C. Daniel, J. Tamkun, and C. Wu. 1995. ISWI, a member of the SWI2/SNF2 ATPase family, encodes the 140 kDa subunit of the nucleosome remodeling factor. Cell 83: 1021–1026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Utley, R. T., K. Ikeda, P. A. Grant, J. Cote, D. J. Steger, A. Eberharter, S. John, and J. L. Workman. 1998. Transcriptional activators direct histone acetyltransferase complexes to nucleosomes. Nature 394: 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga-Weisz, P. D., M. Wilm, E. Bonte, K. Dumas, M. Mann, and P. B. Becker. 1997. Chromatin-remodelling factor CHRAC contains the ATPases ISWI and topoisomerase II. Nature 388: 598–602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vashee, S., K. Melchor, W. V. Ding, S. A. Johnson, and T. Kodadek. 1998. Evidence for two modes of cooperative DNA binding in vivo that do not involve direct protein-protein interactions. Curr. Biol. 8: 452–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashee, S., J. Willie, and T. Kodadek. 1998. Synergistic activation of transcription by physiologically unrelated transcription factors through cooperative DNA-binding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 247: 530–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widom, J. 2001. Role of DNA sequence in nucleosome stability and dynamics. Q. Rev. Biophys. 34: 269–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrick, J. J., F. C. Holstege, E. G. Jennings, H. C. Causton, D. Shore, M. Grunstein, E. S. Lander, and R. A. Young. 1999. Chromosomal landscape of nucleosome-dependent gene expression and silencing in yeast. Nature 402: 418–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J., P. T. Lowary, and J. Widom. 1993. Twist constraints on linker DNA in the 30-nm chromatin fiber: implications for nucleosome phasing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 9364–9368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, L., N. Sabet, A. Chambers, and R. H. Morse. 2001. The N-terminal and C-terminal domains of RAP1 are dispensable for chromatin opening and GCN4-mediated HIS4 activation in budding yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 33257–33264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar