Yeast Recombination Enhancer Is Stimulated by Transcription Activation

REFERENCES

• Aguilera, A., S. Chavez, and F. Malagon. 2000. Mitotic recombination in yeast: elements controlling its incidence. Yeast 16:731–754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brachmann, C. B., A. Davies, G. J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J. D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breeden, L., and K. Nasmyth. 1987. Cell cycle control of the yeast HO gene: cis- and trans-acting regulators. Cell 48:389–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bressan, D. A., J. Vazquez, and J. E. Haber. 2004. Mating type-dependent constraints on the mobility of the left arm of yeast chromosome III. J. Cell Biol. 164:361–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connolly, B. A., C. I. White, and J. E. Haber. 1988. Physical monitoring of mating type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:2342–2349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ercan, S., and R. T. Simpson. 2004. Global chromatin structure of 45,000 base pairs of chromosome III in a- and α-cell yeast and during mating-type switching. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10026–10035.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haber, J. E. 1998. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:561–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, A., and M. Grunstein. 1999. Mapping DNA interaction sites of chromosomal proteins using immunoprecipitation and polymerase chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 304:399–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hereford, L., S. Bromley, and M. A. Osley. 1982. Periodic transcription of yeast histone genes. Cell 30:305–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hereford, L. M., M. A. Osley, T. R. Ludwig II, and C. S. McLaughlin. 1981. Cell-cycle regulation of yeast histone mRNA. Cell 24:367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herskowitz, I. 1989. A regulatory hierarchy for cell specialization in yeast. Nature 342:749–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, A. J., J. B. Hicks, and J. N. Strathern. 1982. Directionality of yeast mating-type interconversion. Cell 28:551–561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kostriken, R., and C. J. Wedeen. 2001. Engineered interphase chromosome loops guide intrachromosomal recombination. EMBO J. 20:2907–2913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar, R., D. M. Reynolds, A. Shevchenko, S. D. Goldstone, and S. Dalton. 2000. Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase. Curr. Biol. 10:896–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laurenson, P., and J. Rine. 1992. Silencers, silencing, and heritable transcriptional states. Microbiol. Rev. 56:543–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longtine, M. S., A. McKenzie, 3rd, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morillon, A., J. O'Sullivan, A. Azad, N. Proudfoot, and J. Mellor. 2003. Regulation of elongating RNA polymerase II by forkhead transcription factors in yeast. Science 300:492–495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. 1983. Molecular analysis of a cell lineage. Nature 302:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oltz, E. M. 2001. Regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly in lymphocytes. Immunol. Res. 23:121–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rine, J., and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 116:9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S. Y., M. Shimizu, L. Johnson, M. Grunstein, and R. T. Simpson. 1992. Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast alpha 2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4. Genes Dev. 6:411–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandell, L. L., and V. A. Zakian. 1993. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75:729–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxe, D., A. Datta, and S. Jinks-Robertson. 2000. Stimulation of mitotic recombination events by high levels of RNA polymerase II transcription in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5404–5414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer, S., and R. W. Davis. 1979. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences constructed in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:4951–4955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. M., B. Li, and J. C. Reese. 2003. SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling of RNR3 requires TAF(II)s and the general transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 17:502–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen, C. H., B. P. Leblanc, J. A. Alfieri, and D. J. Clark. 2001. Remodeling of yeast CUP1 chromatin involves activator-dependent repositioning of nucleosomes over the entire gene and flanking sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:534–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C. H., B. P. Leblanc, C. Neal, R. Akhavan, and D. J. Clark. 2002. Targeted histone acetylation at the yeast CUP1 promoter requires the transcriptional activator, the TATA boxes, and the putative histone acetylase encoded by SPT10. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6406–6416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, P., P. Houston, and J. Broach. 2002. Directional bias during mating type switching in Saccharomyces is independent of chromosomal architecture. EMBO J. 21:2282–2291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, R. T. 1990. Nucleosome positioning can affect the function of a cis-acting DNA element in vivo. Nature 343:387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, J. N., and I. Herskowitz. 1979. Asymmetry and directionality in production of new cell types during clonal growth: the switching pattern of homothallic yeast. Cell 17:371–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, K., E. Coic, Z. Zhou, P. Durrens, and J. E. Haber. 2002. Saccharomyces forkhead protein Fkh1 regulates donor preference during mating-type switching through the recombination enhancer. Genes Dev. 16:2085–2096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szeto, L., and J. R. Broach. 1997. Role of α2 protein in donor locus selection during mating type interconversion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:751–759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szeto, L., M. K. Fafalios, H. Zhong, A. K. Vershon, and J. R. Broach. 1997. Alpha2p controls donor preference during mating type interconversion in yeast by inactivating a recombinational enhancer of chromosome III. Genes Dev. 11:1899–1911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogelauer, M., J. Wu, N. Suka, and M. Grunstein. 2000. Global histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nature 408:495–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, K. S., and J. R. Broach. 1992. Donor locus selection during Saccharomyces cerevisiae mating type interconversion responds to distant regulatory signals. Genetics 132:929–942.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss, K., and R. T. Simpson. 1997. Cell type-specific chromatin organization of the region that governs directionality of yeast mating type switching. EMBO J. 16:4352–4360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, C., K. Weiss, C. Yang, M. A. Harris, B. K. Tye, C. S. Newlon, R. T. Simpson, and J. E. Haber. 1998. Mcm1 regulates donor preference controlled by the recombination enhancer in Saccharomyces mating-type switching. Genes Dev. 12:1726–1737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., and J. E. Haber. 1996. A 700-bp cis-acting region controls mating-type dependent recombination along the entire left arm of yeast chromosome III. Cell 87:277–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu, X., and J. E. Haber. 1995. MATa donor preference in yeast mating-type switching: activation of a large chromosomal region for recombination. Genes Dev. 9:1922–1932.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, Z., and J. C. Reese. 2004. Redundant mechanisms are used by Ssn6-Tup1 in repressing chromosomal gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279:39240–39250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu, G., P. T. Spellman, T. Volpe, P. O. Brown, D. Botstein, T. N. Davis, and B. Futcher. 2000. Two yeast forkhead genes regulate the cell cycle and pseudohyphal growth. Nature 406:90–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar