Role for SUMO Modification in Facilitating Transcriptional Repression by BKLF

REFERENCES

• Abdel-Hafiz, H. A., G. S. Takimoto, L. Tung, and K. B. Horwitz. 2002. The inhibitory function (IF) in human progesterone receptor N-termini binds small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO-1) protein to regulate autoinhibition and transrepression. J. Biol. Chem. 277:33950–33956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bies, J., J. Markus, and L. Wolff. 2002. Covalent attachment of the SUMO-1 protein to the negative regulatory domain of the c-Myb transcription factor modifies its stability and transactivation capacity. J. Biol. Chem. 277:8999–9009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Courey, A. J., and R. Tjian. 1988. Analysis of Sp1 in vivo reveals multiple transcriptional domains, including a novel glutamine-rich activation motif. Cell 55:887–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, M., E. Whitelaw, A. Perkins, G. Williams, Y. Fujiwara, and S. H. Orkin. 1996. Isolation and characterization of the cDNA encoding BKLF/TEF-2, a major CACCC-box-binding protein in erythroid cells and selected other cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1695–1705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, G., M. A. Neptune, and R. A. DePinho. 2002. SUMO-1 modification of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) modulates its biological activities. J. Biol. Chem. 277:23658–23663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desterro, J. M., M. S. Rodriguez, and R. T. Hay. 1998. SUMO-1 modification of IκBα inhibits NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell 2:233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desterro, J. M., J. Thomson, and R. T. Hay. 1997. Ubch9 conjugates SUMO but not ubiquitin. FEBS Lett. 417:297–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eloranta, J. J., and H. C. Hurst. 2002. Transcription factor AP-2 interacts with the SUMO-conjugating enzyme UBC9 and is sumolated in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 277:30798–30804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. M., and T. Maniatis. 1989. Two different virus-inducible elements are required for human beta-interferon gene regulation. EMBO J. 8:101–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girdwood, D., D. Bumpass, O. A. Vaughan, A. Thain, L. A. Anderson, A. W. Snowden, E. Garcia-Wilson, N. D. Perkins, and R. T. Hay. 2003. P300 transcriptional repression is mediated by SUMO modification. Mol. Cell 11:1043–1054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardeland, U., R. Steinacher, J. Jiricny, and P. Schar. 2002. Modification of the human thymine-DNA glycosylase by ubiquitin-like proteins facilitates enzymatic turnover. EMBO J. 21:1456–1464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harder, Z., R. Zunino, and H. McBride. 2004. Sumo1 conjugates mitochondrial substrates and participates in mitochondrial fission. Curr. Biol. 14:340–345.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, S., M. E. Van Antwerp, and J. A. Iniguez-Lluhi. 2003. Direct and distinguishable inhibitory roles for SUMO isoforms in the control of transcriptional synergy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:15758–15763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A., and D. Pearce. 2000. A common motif within the negative regulatory regions of multiple factors inhibits their transcriptional synergy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6040–6050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., and A. A. Gupta. 2001. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106:735–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczynski, J., T. Cook, and R. Urrutia. 2003. Sp1- and Kruppel-like transcription factors. Genome Biol. 4:206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagey, M. H., T. A. Melhuish, and D. Wotton. 2003. The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell 113:127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahyo, T., T. Nishida, and H. Yasuda. 2001. Involvement of PIAS1 in the sumoylation of tumor suppressor p53. Mol. Cell 8:713–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., C. A. Cantwell, P. F. Johnson, C. M. Pfarr, and S. C. Williams. 2002. Transcriptional activity of CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins is controlled by a conserved inhibitory domain that is a target for sumoylation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:38037–38044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. H., C. Y. Choi, and Y. Kim. 1999. Covalent modification of the homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2) by the ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:12350–12355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsh, O., J. S. Seeler, A. Pichler, A. Gast, S. Muller, E. Miska, M. Mathieu, A. Harel-Bellan, T. Kouzarides, F. Melchior, and A. Dejean. 2002. The SUMO E3 ligase RanBP2 promotes modification of the HDAC4 deacetylase. EMBO J. 21:2682–2691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotaja, N., S. Aittomaki, O. Silvennoinen, J. J. Palvimo, and O. A. Janne. 2000. ARIP3 (androgen receptor-interacting protein 3) and other PIAS (protein inhibitor of activated STAT) proteins differ in their ability to modulate steroid receptor-dependent transcriptional activation. Mol. Endocrinol. 14:1986–2000.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kotaja, N., U. Karvonen, O. A. Janne, and J. J. Palvimo. 2002. PIAS proteins modulate transcription factors by functioning as SUMO-1 ligases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:5222–5234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., M. Liang, Y. Y. Liang, F. C. Brunicardi, and X. H. Feng. 2003. SUMO-1/Ubc9 promotes nuclear accumulation and metabolic stability of tumor suppressor Smad4. J. Biol. Chem. 278:31043–31048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, X., B. Sun, M. Liang, Y. Y. Liang, A. Gast, J. Hildebrand, F. C. Brunicardi, F. Melchior, and X. H. Feng. 2003. Opposed regulation of corepressor CtBP by SUMOylation and PDZ binding. Mol. Cell 11:1389–1396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long, J., G. Wang, D. He, and F. Liu. 2004. Repression of Smad4 transcriptional activity by SUMO modification. Biochem. J. 379:23–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin, D. I., S. F. Tsai, and S. H. Orkin. 1989. Increased gamma-globin expression in a nondeletion HPFH mediated by an erythroid-specific DNA-binding factor. Nature 338:435–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchior, F. 2000. SUMO—nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 16:591–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchior, F., M. Schergaut, and A. Pichler. 2003. SUMO: ligases, isopeptidases and nuclear pores. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:612–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, S., M. Berger, F. Lehembre, J. S. Seeler, Y. Haupt, and A. Dejean. 2000. c-Jun and p53 activity is modulated by SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13321–13329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, S., C. Hoege, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2001. SUMO, ubiquitin's mysterious cousin. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratani, M., and W. P. Tansey. 2003. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:192–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida, T., and H. Yasuda. 2002. PIAS1 and PIASxa function as SUMO-E3 ligases toward androgen receptor, and repress androgen receptor-dependent transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 277:41311–41317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdomo, J., M. Holmes, B. Chong, and M. Crossley. 2000. Eos and pegasus, two members of the Ikaros family of proteins with distinct DNA binding activities. J. Biol. Chem. 275:38347–38354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie, K., F. Guidez, L. Howell, L. Healy, S. Waxman, M. Greaves, and A. Zelent. 2003. The histone deacetylase 9 gene encodes multiple protein isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16059–16072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philipsen, S., and G. Suske. 1999. A tale of three fingers: the family of mammalian Sp/XKLF transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:2991–3000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler, A., A. Gast, J. S. Seeler, A. Dejean, and F. Melchior. 2002. The nucleoporin RanBP2 has SUMO1 E3 ligase activity. Cell 108:109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichler, A., and F. Melchior. 2002. Ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO1 and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Traffic 3:381–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poukka, H., U. Karvonen, O. A. Janne, and J. J. Palvimo. 2000. Covalent modification of the androgen receptor by small ubiquitin-like modifier 1 (SUMO-1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:14145–14150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S., J. L. Best, L. I. Zon, and G. Gill. 2002. SUMO-1 modification represses Sp3 transcriptional activation and modulates its subnuclear localization. Mol. Cell 10:831–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rui, H. L., E. Fan, H. M. Zhou, Z. Xu, Y. Zhang, and S. C. Lin. 2002. SUMO-1 modification of the C-terminal KVEKVD of Axin is required for JNK activation but has no effect on Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 277:42981–42986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sachdev, S., L. Bruhn, H. Sieber, A. Pichler, F. Melchior, and R. Grosschedl. 2001. PIASy, a nuclear matrix-associated SUMO E3 ligase, represses LEF1 activity by sequestration into nuclear bodies. Genes Dev. 15:3088–3103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saitoh, H., and J. Hinchey. 2000. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 275:6252–6258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
   Google Scholar
• Sapetschnig, A., G. Rischitor, H. Braun, A. Doll, M. Schergaut, F. Melchior, and G. Suske. 2002. Transcription factor Sp3 is silenced through SUMO modification by PIAS1. EMBO J. 21:5206–5215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt, D., and S. Muller. 2003. PIAS/SUMO: new partners in transcriptional regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 60:2561–2574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. C., and M. Hochstrasser. 2003. A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers. Trends Biochem. Sci. 28:321–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seeler, J. S., and A. Dejean. 2003. Nuclear and unclear functions of SUMO. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:690–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeler, J. S., and A. Dejean. 2001. SUMO: of branched proteins and nuclear bodies. Oncogene 20:7243–7249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewalt, R. G., M. J. Gunster, J. van der Vlag, D. P. Satijn, and A. P. Otte. 1999. C-Terminal binding protein is a transcriptional repressor that interacts with a specific class of vertebrate Polycomb proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:777–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., X. Li, Y. Wang, M. Zarnegar, C. Y. Huang, J. J. Palvimo, B. Lim, and Z. Sun. 2003. hZimp10 is an androgen receptor co-activator and forms a complex with SUMO-1 at replication foci. EMBO J. 22:6101–6114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi, Y., J. Sawada, G. Sui, Affar, el B., J. R. Whetstine, F. Lan, H. Ogawa, M. P. Luke, and Y. Nakatani. 2003. Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature 422:735–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiio, Y., and R. N. Eisenman. 2003. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:13225–13230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleigh, M. J. 1986. A nonchromatographic assay for expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in eucaryotic cells. Anal. Biochem. 156:251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelter, P., and H. D. Ulrich. 2003. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425:188–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahle, U., W. Schmid, and G. Schutz. 1988. Synergistic action of the glucocorticoid receptor with transcription factors. EMBO J. 7:3389–3395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, L., M. D. Benson, and J. A. Iniguez-Lluhi. 2003. A synergy control motif within the attenuator domain of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha inhibits transcriptional synergy through its PIASy-enhanced modification by SUMO-1 or SUMO-3. J. Biol. Chem. 278:9134–9141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallec, L. P., O. Kirsh, M. C. Lecomte, S. Viengchareun, M. C. Zennaro, A. Dejean, and M. Lombes. 2003. Protein inhibitor of activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 interacts with the N-terminal domain of mineralocorticoid receptor and represses its transcriptional activity: implication of small ubiquitin-related modifier 1 modification. Mol. Endocrinol. 17:2529–2542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tatham, M. H., E. Jaffray, O. A. Vaughan, J. M. Desterro, C. H. Botting, J. H. Naismith, and R. T. Hay. 2001. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35368–35374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, S., H. Poukka, J. J. Palvimo, and O. A. Janne. 2002. SUMO-1 modification of the glucocorticoid receptor. Biochem. J. 367:907–911.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, J., and M. Crossley. 1998. Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co-repressor that associates with basic Kruppel-like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators. EMBO J. 17:5129–5140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J., and M. Crossley. 2001. The CtBP family: enigmatic and enzymatic transcriptional co-repressors. Bioessays 23:683–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, J., H. Nicholas, D. Bishop, J. M. Matthews, and M. Crossley. 2003. The LIM protein FHL3 binds basic Kruppel-like factor/Kruppel-like factor 3 and its co-repressor C-terminal-binding protein 2. J. Biol. Chem. 278:12786–12795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulrich, H. D. 2004. How to activate a damage-tolerant polymerase: consequences of PCNA modifications by ubiquitin and SUMO. Cell Cycle 3:15–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verger, A., J. Perdomo, and M. Crossley. 2003. Modification with SUMO: a role in transcriptional regulation. EMBO Rep. 4:137–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman, A. M. 2001. Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2:169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. H., E. Jaffray, R. T. Hay, and A. D. Sharrocks. 2003. Dynamic interplay of the SUMO and ERK pathways in regulating Elk-1 transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell 12:63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. H., and A. D. Sharrocks. 2004. SUMO promotes HDAC-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell 13:611–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q., Y. Yoshimatsu, J. Hildebrand, S. M. Frisch, and R. H. Goodman. 2003. Homeodomain interacting protein kinase 2 promotes apoptosis by downregulating the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. Cell 115:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar