Inhibition of DNA Binding by Differential Sumoylation of Heat Shock Factors

REFERENCES

• Ahn, S. G., P. C. Liu, K. Klyachko, R. I. Morimoto, and D. J. Thiele. 2001. The loop domain of heat shock transcription factor 1 dictates DNA-binding specificity and responses to heat stress. Genes Dev. 15:2134–2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alastalo, T.-P., M. Hellesuo, A. Sandqvist, V. Hietakangas, M. Kallio, and L. Sistonen. 2003. Formation of nuclear stress granules involves HSF2 and coincides with the nucleolar localization of Hsp70. J. Cell Sci. 116:3557–3570.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amin, J., J. Ananthan, and R. Voellmy. 1988. Key features of heat shock regulatory elements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:3761–3769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier-Villamor, V., D. A. Sampson, M. J. Matunis, and C. J. Lima. 2002. Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1. Cell 108:345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, J. J., C. Ballou, and D. L. Fackenthal. 1994. Interactions between DNA-bound trimers of the yeast heat shock factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:501–508.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyer-Guittaut, M., K. Birsoy, C. Potel, G. Elliott, E. Jaffray, J. M. Desterro, R. T. Hay, and T. Oelgeschlager. 2005. SUMO-1 modification of human transcription factor (TF) IID complex subunits: inhibition of TFIID promoter-binding activity through SUMO-1 modification of hsTAF5. J. Biol. Chem. 280:9937–9945.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cicero, M. P., S. T. Hubl, C. J. Harrison, O. Littlefield, J. A. Hardy, and H. C. M. Nelson. 2001. The wing in yeast heat shock transcription factor (HSF) DNA-binding domain is required for full activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:1715–1723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desterro, J. M. P., M. S. Rodriguez, G. D. Kemp, and R. T. Hay. 1999. Identification of the enzyme required for activation of the small ubiquitin-like protein SUMO-1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:10618–10624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobreva, G., J. Dambacher, and R. Grosschedl. 2003. SUMO modification of a novel MAR-binding protein, SATB2, modulates immunoglobulin μ gene expression. Genes Dev. 17:3048–3061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodson, M. L., Y. Hong, R. Rogers, M. J. Matunis, O-K. Park-Sarge, and K. D. Sarge. 2001. SUMO-1 modification regulates the DNA-binding activity of heat shock transcription factor 2, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body associated transcription factor. J. Biol. Chem. 276:18513–18518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo, D., M. Li, Y. Zhang, P. Yang, S. Eckenrode, D. Hopkins, W. Zheng, S. Purohit, R. H. Podolsky, A. Muir, J. Wang, Z. Dong, T. Brusko, M. Atkinson, P. Pozzilli, A. Zeidler, L. J. Raffel, C. O. Jacob, Y. Park, M. Serrano-Rios, M. T. Larrad, Z. Zhang, H. J. Garchon, J. F. Bach, J. I. Rotter, J. X. She, and C. Y. Wang. 2004. A functional variant of SUMO4, a new I kappa B alpha modifier, is associated with type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 36:837–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, J. A., and H. C. M. Nelson. 2000. Proline in alpha-helical kink is required for folding kinetics but not for kinked structure, function, or stability of heat shock transcription factor. Protein Sci. 9:2128–2141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hietakangas, V., J. K. Ahlskog, A. M. Jakobsson, M. Hellesuo, N. M. Sahlberg, C. I. Holmberg, A. Mikhailov, J. J. Palvimo, L. Pirkkala, and L. Sistonen. 2003. Phosphorylation of serine 303 is a prerequisite for the stress-inducible SUMO modification of heat shock factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:2953–2968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgarth, R. S., L. A. Murphy, C. M. O'Connor, J. A. Clark, O-K. Park-Sarge, and K. D. Sarge. 2004. Identification of Xenopus heat shock transcription factor-2: conserved role of sumoylation in regulating deoxyribonucleic acid-binding activity of heat shock transcription factor-2 proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones 9:214–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y., R. Rogers, M. J. Matunis, C. N. Mayhew, M. L. Goodson, O.-K. Park-Sarge, and K. D. Sarge. 2001. Regulation of heat shock transcription factor 1 by stress-induced SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem. 276:40263–40267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:355–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. S., I. Schwienhorst, R. J. Dohmen, and G. Blobel. 1997. The ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. EMBO J. 16:5509–5519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, M., Y. Chang, M. Manuel, T.-P. Alastalo, M. Rallu, Y. Gitton, L. Pirkkala, M-T. Loones, L. Paslaru, S. Larney, S. Hiard, M. Morange, L. Sistonen, and V. Mezger. 2002. Brain abnormalities, defective meiotic chromosome synapsis and female subfertility in HSF2 null mice. EMBO J. 21:2591–2601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotaja, N., U. Karvonen, O. A. Jänne, and J. J. Palvimo. 2002. PIAS proteins modulate transcription factors by functioning as SUMO-1 ligases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5222–5234.
   Google Scholar
• Kroeger, P. E., K. D. Sarge, and R. I. Morimoto. 1993. Mouse heat shock transcription factors 1 and 2 prefer a trimeric binding site but interact differently with the HSP70 heat shock element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:3370–3383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeger, P. E., and R. I. Morimoto. 1994. Selection of new HSF1 and HSF2 DNA-binding sites reveals difference in trimer cooperativity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:7592–7603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D., M. H. Tatham, B. Yu, S. Kim, R. T. Hay, and Y. Chen. 2002. Identification of a substrate recognition site on Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21740–21748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-Y., T. Ohshima, and K. Shimotohno. 2004. Association of Ubc9, an E2 ligase for SUMO conjugation, with p53 is regulated by phosphorylation of p53. FEBS Lett. 573:15–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Littlefield, O., and H. C. M. Nelson. 1999. A new use for the ‘wing’ of the ‘winged’ helix-turn-helix motif in the HSF-DNA cocrystal. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:464–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manuel, M., M. Rallu, M-T. Loones, V. Zimarino, V. Mezger, and M. Morange. 2002. Determination of the consensus binding sequence for the purified embryonic heat shock factor 2. Eur. J. Biochem. 269:2527–2537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marti-Renom, M. A., A. Stuart, A. Fiser, R. Sánchez, F. Melo, and A. Sali. 2000. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29:291–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mosser, D. D., N. G. Theodorakis, and R. I. Morimoto. 1988. Coordinate changes in heat shock element-binding activity and HSP70 gene transcription rates in human cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:84736–84744.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, S., M. J. Matunis, and A. Dejean. 1998. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J. 17:61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S., M. Berger, F. Lehembre, J.-S. Seeler, Y. Haupt, and A. Dejean. 2000. c-Jun and p53 activity is modulated by SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13321–13329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. P., J. J. Gorzowski, K. D. Sarge, and B. Phillips. 1994. Characterization of constitutive DNA-binding activity in mouse carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:5309–5317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pirkkala, L., T-P. Alastalo, X. Zuo, I. J. Benjamin, and L. Sistonen. 2000. Disruption of heat shock factor 1 reveals an essential role in the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2670–2675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirkkala, L., P. Nykänen, and L. Sistonen. 2001. Roles of the heat shock transcription factors in regulation of the heat shock response and beyond. FASEB J. 15:1118–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poukkula, M., A. Kaunisto, V. Hietakangas, K. Denessiouk, T. Katajamäki, M. S. Johnson, L. Sistonen, and J. E. Eriksson. 2005. Rapid turnover of c-FLIPshort is determined by its unique C-terminal tail. J. Biol. Chem. 280:27345–27355.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rallu, M., M.-T. Loones, Y. Lallemand, R. Morimoto, M. Morange, and V. Mezger. 1997. Function and regulation of heat shock factor 2 during mouse embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2392–2397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodriguez, M. S., C. Dargemont, and R. T. Hay. 2001. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 276:12654–12659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sali, A., and T. L. Blundell. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234:779–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, D. A., M. Wang, and M. J. Matunis. 2001. The small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) consensus sequence mediates Ubc9 binding and is essential for SUMO-1 modification. J. Biol. Chem. 276:21664–21669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarge, K. D., V. Zimarino, K. Holm, C. Wu, and R. I. Morimoto. 1991. Cloning and characterization of two mouse heat shock factors with distinct inducible and constitutive DNA-binding activity. Genes Dev. 5:1902–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarge, K. D., S. P. Murphy, and R. I. Morimoto. 1993. Activation of heat shock gene transcription by heat shock factor 1 involves oligomerization, acquisition of DNA-binding activity, and nuclear localization and can occur in the absence of stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1392–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarge, K. D., O.-K. Park-Sarge, J. D. Kirby, K. E. Mayo, and R. I. Morimoto. 1994. Expression of heat shock factor 2 in mouse testis: potential role as a regulator of heat-shock protein gene expression during spermatogenesis. Biol. Reprod. 50:1334–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, M. H., E. Jaffray, O. A. Vaughan, J. M. P. Desterro, C. H. Botting, J. H. Naismith, and R. T. Hay. 2001. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35368–35374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuister, G. W., S. J. Kim, A. Orosz, J. Marquardt, C. Wu, and A. Bax. 1994. Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of Drosophila heat shock transcription factor. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1:605–614.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, G., J. Zhang, D. Moskophidis, and N. F. Mivechi. 2003. Targeted disruption of the heat shock transcription factor (hsf)-2 gene results in increased embryonic lethality, neuronal defects, and reduced spermatogenesis. Genesis 36:48–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., and J. T. Lis. 1988. Germline transformation used to define key features of heat-shock response elements. Science 239:1139–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, H., O. Perisic, and J. T. Lis. 1991. Cooperative binding of Drosophila heat shock factor to arrays of a conserved 5 bp unit. Cell 64:585–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, H., D. C. Wilkerson, C. N. Mayhew, E. J. Lubert, H. S. Skaggs, M. L. Goodson, Y. Hong, O.-K. Park-Sarge, and K. D. Sarge. 2005. Mechanism of hsp70i gene bookmarking. Science 307:421–423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar