Reb1, Cbf1, and Pho4 Bias Histone Sliding and Deposition Away from Their Binding Sites

REFERENCES

• Knezetic JA, Luse DS. 1986. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell 45:95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(86)90541-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch Y, LaPointe JW, Kornberg RD. 1987. Nucleosomes inhibit the initiation of transcription but allow chain elongation with the displacement of histones. Cell 49:203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(87)90561-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han M, Grunstein M. 1988. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55:1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90258-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberg RD, Lorch Y. 1999. Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81958-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, Hughes TR, Nislow C. 2007. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39:1235–1244. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Pugh BF. 2009. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 10:161–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhl K, Segal E. 2013. Determinants of nucleosome positioning. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee HS, Bataille AR, Zhang L, Pugh BF. 2014. Subnucleosomal structures and nucleosome asymmetry across a genome. Cell 159:1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapier CR, Cairns BR. 2009. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 78:273–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew B. 2014. Regulating the chromatin landscape: structural and mechanistic perspectives. Annu Rev Biochem 83:671–696. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-051810-093157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller-Planitz F, Klinker H, Becker PB. 2013. Nucleosome sliding mechanisms: new twists in a looped history. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Längst G, Manelyte L. 2015. Chromatin remodelers: from function to dysfunction. Genes 6:299–324. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes6020299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaus A, Martin DMA, Barton GJ, Owen-Hughes T. 2006. Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res 34:2887–2905. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusser A, Urwin DL, Kadonaga JT. 2005. Distinct activities of CHD1 and ACF in ATP-dependent chromatin assembly. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:160–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkikopoulos T, Schofield P, Singh V, Pinskaya M, Mellor J, Smolle M, Workman JL, Barton GJ, Owen-Hughes T. 2011. A role for Snf2-related nucleosome-spacing enzymes in genome-wide nucleosome organization. Science 333:1758–1760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pointner J, Persson J, Prasad P, Norman-Axelsson U, Strålfors A, Khorosjutina O, Krietenstein N, Svensson JP, Ekwall K, Korber P. 2012. CHD1 remodelers regulate nucleosome spacing in vitro and align nucleosomal arrays over gene coding regions in S. pombe. EMBO J 31:4388–4403. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano AN, Schnitzler GR, Kingston RE. 1996. Nucleosome disruption by human SWI/SNF is maintained in the absence of continued ATP hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 271:20726–20733. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.34.20726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie C, Peterson CL. 1997. Catalytic activity of the yeast SWI/SNF complex on reconstituted nucleosome arrays. EMBO J 16:6772–6782. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.22.6772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoyagi S, Narlikar G, Zheng C, Sif S, Kingston RE, Hayes JJ. 2002. Nucleosome remodeling by the human SWI/SNF complex requires transient global disruption of histone-DNA interactions. Mol Cell Biol 22:3653–3662. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.11.3653-3662.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockdale C, Flaus A, Ferreira H, Owen-Hughes T. 2006. Analysis of nucleosome repositioning by yeast ISWI and Chd1 chromatin remodeling complexes. J Biol Chem 281:16279–16288. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M600682200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha A, Wittmeyer J, Cairns BR. 2005. Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassabov SR, Zhang B, Persinger J, Bartholomew B. 2003. SWI/SNF unwraps, slides, and rewraps the nucleosome. Mol Cell 11:391–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00039-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T. 2003. Dynamic properties of nucleosomes during thermal and ATP-driven mobilization. Mol Cell Biol 23:7767–7779. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.21.7767-7779.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodelman IM, Horvath KC, Levendosky RF, Winger J, Ren R, Patel A, Li M, Wang MD, Roberts E, Bowman GD. 2016. The Chd1 chromatin remodeler can sense both entry and exit sides of the nucleosome. Nucleic Acids Res 44:7580–7591. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zofall M, Persinger J, Kassabov SR, Bartholomew B.2006. Chromatin remodeling by ISW2 and SWI/SNF requires DNA translocation inside the nucleosome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 13:339–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher TM, Xiao N, Mautino G, Baumann CT, Wolford R, Warren BS, Hager GL. 2002. ATP-dependent mobilization of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell Biol 22:3255–3263. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.10.3255-3263.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaich AK, Walker DA, Wolford R, Hager GL. 2004. Rapid periodic binding and displacement of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 14:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1097-2765(04)00178-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Hada A, Sen P, Olufemi L, Hall MA, Smith BY, Forth S, McKnight JN, Patel A, Bowman GD, Bartholomew B, Wang MD. 2015. Dynamic regulation of transcription factors by nucleosome remodeling. Elife 4:e06249. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06249.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley PD, Madhani HD. 2009. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137:445–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganguli D, Chereji RV, Iben JR, Cole HA, Clark DJ. 2014. RSC-dependent constructive and destructive interference between opposing arrays of phased nucleosomes in yeast. Genome Res 24:1637–1649. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.177014.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubik S, Bruzzone MJ, Jacquet P, Falcone J-L, Rougemont J, Shore D. 2015. Nucleosome stability distinguishes two different promoter types at all protein-coding genes in yeast. Mol Cell 60:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein-Brill A, Joseph-Strauss D, Appleboim A, Friedman N. 2019. Dynamics of chromatin and transcription during transient depletion of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex. Cell Rep 26:279–292.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planta RJ, Gonçalves PM, Mager WH. 1995. Global regulators of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast. Biochem Cell Biol 73:825–834. https://doi.org/10.1139/o95-090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasman DI, Lue NF, Buchman AR, LaPointe JW, Lorch Y, Kornberg RD. 1990. A yeast protein that influences the chromatin structure of UASG and functions as a powerful auxiliary gene activator. Genes Dev 4:503–514. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.4.4.503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal R, Choudhury M, Zaman S, Singh S, Santosh V, Bastia D, Escalante CR. 2016. Functional architecture of the Reb1-Ter complex of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E2267–E2276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525465113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elemento O, Tavazoie S. 2005. Fast and systematic genome-wide discovery of conserved regulatory elements using a non-alignment based approach. Genome Biol 6:R18. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badis G, Chan ET, van Bakel H, Pena-Castillo L, Tillo D, Tsui K, Carlson CD, Gossett AJ, Hasinoff MJ, Warren CL, Gebbia M, Talukder S, Yang A, Mnaimneh S, Terterov D, Coburn D, Li Yeo A, Yeo ZX, Clarke ND, Lieb JD, Ansari AZ, Nislow C, Hughes TR. 2008. A library of yeast transcription factor motifs reveals a widespread function for Rsc3 in targeting nucleosome exclusion at promoters. Mol Cell 32:878–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C, Chen H, Bai L. 2018. Systematic study of nucleosome-displacing factors in budding yeast. Mol Cell 71:294–305.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Morse RH. 1999. Chromatin opening and transactivator potentiation by RAP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19:5279–5288. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.8.5279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan BT, Chen H, Jipa C, Bai L, Poirier MG. 2019. Dissociation rate compensation mechanism for budding yeast pioneer transcription factors. Elife 8:e43008. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43008.
   Google Scholar
• Bai L, Ondracka A, Cross FR. 2011. Multiple sequence-specific factors generate the nucleosome-depleted region on CLN2 promoter. Mol Cell 42:465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisner RM, Hartley PD, Meneghini MD, Bao MZ, Liu CL, Schreiber SL, Rando OJ, Madhani HD. 2005. Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5′ ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123:233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaemmaghami S, Huh W-K, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O’Shea EK, Weissman JS. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425:737–741. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai M, Davis RW. 1990. Yeast centromere binding protein CBF1, of the helix-loop-helix protein family, is required for chromosome stability and methionine prototrophy. Cell 61:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(90)90525-j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, O’Shea EK. 2011. Integrated approaches reveal determinants of genome-wide binding and function of the transcription factor Pho4. Mol Cell 42:826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.05.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, Danford TW, Hannett NM, Tagne J-B, Reynolds DB, Yoo J, Jennings EG, Zeitlinger J, Pokholok DK, Kellis M, Rolfe PA, Takusagawa KT, Lander ES, Gifford DK, Fraenkel E, Young RA. 2004. Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIsaac KD, Wang T, Gordon DB, Gifford DK, Stormo GD, Fraenkel E. 2006. An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell KF, Baker RE. 1992. Possible cross-regulation of phosphate and sulfate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/132.1.63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaret KS, Carroll JS. 2011. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes Dev 25:2227–2241. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.176826.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowary PT, Widom J. 1998. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 276:19–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winger J, Bowman GD. 2017. The sequence of nucleosomal DNA modulates sliding by the Chd1 chromatin remodeler. J Mol Biol 429:808–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2017.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber RT, Rhee HS, Jiang C, Pugh BF. 2009. Interaction of transcriptional regulators with specific nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces genome. Mol Cell 35:889–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall LE, Graham DR, Reich KA, Sigman DS. 1981. Cleavage of deoxyribonucleic acid by the 1,10-phenanthroline-cuprous complex. Hydrogen peroxide requirement and primary and secondary structure specificity. Biochemistry 20:244–250. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00505a003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew HR, Travers AA. 1984. DNA structural variations in the E. coli tyrT promoter. Cell 37:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90379-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira H, Somers J, Webster R, Flaus A, Owen-Hughes T. 2007. Histone tails and the H3 alphaN helix regulate nucleosome mobility and stability. Mol Cell Biol 27:4037–4048. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.02229-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei J, Torigoe SE, Brown CR, Khuong MT, Kassavetis GA, Boeger H, Kadonaga JT. 2015. The prenucleosome, a stable conformational isomer of the nucleosome. Genes Dev 29:2563–2575. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.272633.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ. 1997. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389:251–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/38444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K, Rechsteiner TJ, Richmond TJ. 1999. Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. Methods Mol Biol 119:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-681-9:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levendosky RF, Sabantsev A, Deindl S, Bowman GD. 2016. The Chd1 chromatin remodeler shifts hexasomes unidirectionally. Elife 5:e21356. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21356.
   Google Scholar
• Arimura Y, Tachiwana H, Oda T, Sato M, Kurumizaka H. 2012. Structural analysis of the hexasome, lacking one histone H2A/H2B dimer from the conventional nucleosome. Biochemistry 51:3302–3309. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi300129b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbart ME, Rechsteiner T, Richmond TJ, Tsukiyama T. 2001. Interactions of Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex with nucleosomal arrays: analyses using recombinant yeast histones and immobilized templates. Mol Cell Biol 21:2098–2106. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.6.2098-2106.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapier CR, Längst G, Corona DV, Becker PB, Nightingale KP. 2001. Critical role for the histone H4 N terminus in nucleosome remodeling by ISWI. Mol Cell Biol 21:875–883. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.3.875-883.2001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran S, Henikoff S. 2016. Nucleosome dynamics during chromatin remodeling in vivo. Nucleus 7:20–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491034.2016.1149666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard K, Xi L, Wang J-P, Widom J. 2012. A map of nucleosome positions in yeast at base-pair resolution. Nature 486:496–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henikoff S, Ramachandran S, Krassovsky K, Bryson TD, Codomo CA, Brogaard K, Widom J, Wang J-P, Henikoff JG. 2014. The budding yeast centromere DNA element II wraps a stable Cse4 hemisome in either orientation in vivo. Elife 3:e01861. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01861.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger W, Peterson CL, Sil A, Coburn C, Arents G, Moudrianakis EN, Herskowitz I. 1995. Amino acid substitutions in the structured domains of histones H3 and H4 partially relieve the requirement of the yeast SWI/SNF complex for transcription. Genes Dev 9:2770–2779. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.22.2770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurumizaka H, Wolffe AP. 1997. Sin mutations of histone H3: influence on nucleosome core structure and function. Mol Cell Biol 17:6953–6969. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.17.12.6953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaus A, Rencurel C, Ferreira H, Wiechens N, Owen-Hughes T. 2004. Sin mutations alter inherent nucleosome mobility. EMBO J 23:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming AB, Pennings S. 2001. Antagonistic remodelling by Swi-Snf and Tup1-Ssn6 of an extensive chromatin region forms the background for FLO1 gene regulation. EMBO J 20:5219–5231. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.18.5219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubik S, O’Duibhir E, de Jonge WJ, Mattarocci S, Albert B, Falcone J-L, Bruzzone MJ, Holstege FCP, Shore D. 2018. Sequence-directed action of RSC remodeler and general regulatory factors modulates +1 nucleosome position to facilitate transcription. Mol Cell 71:89–102.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennessy RT, Owen-Hughes T. 2016. Establishment of a promoter-based chromatin architecture on recently replicated DNA can accommodate variable inter-nucleosome spacing. Nucleic Acids Res 44:7189–7203. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasseur P, Tonazzini S, Ziane R, Camasses A, Rando OJ, Radman-Livaja M. 2016. Dynamics of nucleosome positioning maturation following genomic replication. Cell Rep 16:2651–2665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav T, Whitehouse I. 2016. Replication-coupled nucleosome assembly and positioning by ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes. Cell Rep 15:715–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Chakravarthy S, Morrone S, Nodelman IM, McKnight JN, Bowman GD. 2013. Decoupling nucleosome recognition from DNA binding dramatically alters the properties of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler. Nucleic Acids Res 41:1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger K, Rechsteiner TJ, Richmond TJ. 1999. Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones. Methods Enzymol 304:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(99)04003-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman A, Ward R, Wiechens N, Singh V, El-Mkami H, Norman DG, Owen-Hughes T. 2011. The histone chaperones Nap1 and Vps75 bind histones H3 and H4 in a tetrameric conformation. Mol Cell 41:398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.01.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nodelman IM, Patel A, Levendosky RF, Bowman GD. 2020. Reconstitution and purification of nucleosomes with recombinant histones and purified DNA. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 133:e130. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpmb.130.
   Google Scholar
• Reference deleted.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar