The Political Economy of Trade Policy in Tunisia

References

• Bechri, M. Z., and S. Naccache. 2007. “The Political Economy of Development Policy in Tunisia.” In Explaining Growth in the Middle East, eds. Jeffrey Nugent and Hashem Pesaran, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 307–334.
   Google Scholar
• Bellin, E. R. 1993. “Civil Society Emergent? State and Social Classes in Tunisia.” PhD thesis. Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagwati, J., A. Panagarya, and T. N. Srinivasan. 1998. Lectures on International Trade. 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, S. 2006. “Protection and Unemployment.” Journal of International Economics, 69: 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Caves, R. E. 1976. “Economic Models of Political Choice: Canada’s Tariff Structure.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 9 (May): 278–300.
   Google Scholar
• Chipman, J. S. 1970. “External Economies of Scale and Competitive Equilibrium.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 34: 347–385.
   Google Scholar
• Corden W. M. 1974. Trade Policy and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eicher, T., and T. Osang. 2002. “Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation: A Comment.” American Economic Review, 92: 1702–1711.
   Google Scholar
• Esfahani, H. S. 2005. “Searching for the (dark) Forces Behind Protection.” Oxford Economic Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Esfahani, H. S., and S. Leaphart. 1999. “Disaggregate Import Demand Elasticities in Turkey.” Unpublished manuscript, available on request from the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Esfahani, H. S., and S. Leaphart. 2000. “Testing the Political Economy Models of Trade Policy: A Generalized Methodology with an Application to Turkey… and Some New Results.” http://www.econometricsociety.org/meetings/wc00/Contributed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande, K. 1997. “Generated Regressors in Linear and Nonlinear Models.” Economics Letters, 54 1997b, 119–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gawande, K., and U. Bandyopadhyay. 2000. “Is Protection for Sale: Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1): 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, P. K., and G. Maggi. 1999. “Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review, 89(5): 1135–1155.
   Google Scholar
• Grissa, A. 1991. “An Interest Group Analysis of Tunisia’s State Enterprises.” In The Institutional Economics and Development: Theory and Application to Tunisia, eds. M. K. Nabli and J. Nugent. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1994. “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review, 84: 833–850.
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, J., and E. Zakrajsek. 2000. “Factor Supplies and Specialization in the World Economy.” NBER Working Paper W7848.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Chang, Cathy. 2005. “The Political Economy of Tariff Protection in China: Evidence from WTO Accession.” [Under review for Journal of Development Economics.] http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Institut d’Economie Quantitative. 1999. Protection effective: M´ethodologie et application à l’économie tunisienne. Décembre 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Institut National de la Statistique, 1986. Nomenclature des Activités et des Produits. Septembre 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Kelejian, H. 1971. “Two Stage Least Squares and Econometric Systems Linear in Parameters but Nonlinear in the Endogenous Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66: 373–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W., and P. Swagel. 1997. “Trade Barriers and Trade Flows Across Countries and Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 79: 372–382.
   Google Scholar
• Maggi, G., and A. Rodriguez-Clare. 2000. “Import Penetration and the Politics of Trade Protection.” Journal of International Economics, 51: 287–304.
   Google Scholar
• McCalman, P. 2004. “Protection for Sale and Trade Liberalization: An Empirical Investigation.” International Economic Review, 12: 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Michalek, J. J., and Jan Hagemejer. 2006. “Political economy of Poland’s trade policy. Empirical verification of Grossman-Helpman model.” Paper presented at the Annual ETSG conference, Vienna, 7–9 September 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. 1848. Principles of Political Economy, with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. London: Parker; reprinted in The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D., D. D. Thomakos, and M. A. Ulubasoglu. 2002. “‘Protection for sale’ in a Developing Country: Democracy versus Dictatorship.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 84: 497–508.
   Google Scholar
• Naccache, S. 2006. “Estimation de la demande d’importation des produits désagrégés des industries manufacturières tunisiennes sur la période 1983–2004.” Unpublished manuscript, available on request from the author.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, J. 1991. “Collective Action in Tunisia’s Producer’s Organizations.” In The Institutional Economics and Development: Theory and Application to Tunisia, eds. M. K. Nabli and J. Nugent. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, E. J. 1981. “The Determinants of Tariff and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the United States.” Journal of Political Economy, 89(1): 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Shiells, C., R. M. Stern, and A. V. Deardorff. 1986. “Estimates of the Elasticities of Substitution between Imports and Home Goods for the United States.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122: 497–519.
   Google Scholar
• Trefler, D. 1993. “Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy.” Journal of Political Economy, 101(1): 138–160.
   Google Scholar
• Varian, H. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2000. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar