Does Mena’s Governance Lead to Spatial Agglomeration?

References

• Ades, A. F. and E. L. Glaeser. 1995. “Trade and circuses: Explaining urban giants.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 195–227.
   Google Scholar
• Amos, 0. M. 1988. “Unbalanced regional growth and regional income inequality in the latter stages of development.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18: 549–566.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V. and L. Iyer. 2005. “History, institutions and economic performance: The legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India.” American Economic Review, 95: 1190— 1213.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, M. and F. A. Gallego. 2007. “Good, bad, and ugly colonial activities: Studying development across the Americas.” Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Christian Science Monitor. 2007. “Ahmadinejad: Rock Star in Rural Iran.” Christian Science Monitor, 7th December.
   Google Scholar
• Elbadawi, I. and S. Makdisi. eds. 2011. Democracy in the Arab World: Explaining the Deficit. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M. and J. F. Thisse. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. V. 2002. “Urbanization in developing countries.” World Bank Research Observer, 17(1): 89–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, S. and S. Kim. 2006. “British colonial institutions and economic development in India.” NBER Working Paper No 12613. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi. 2009. “Governance matters VIII aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 4978, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay and M. Mastruzzi. 2008. “Governance matters VII aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2007.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 4654, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2007. “Institutions and U.S. regional development: A study of Massachusetts and Virginia.” NBER Working Paper No 13431, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2008a. “Spatial inequality and economic development: Theories, facts, and policies.” Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper No. 16. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Growth and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. 2008b. “Political institutions, federalism and U.S. urban development: The case of American exceptionalism.” In progress.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1991. “Increasing returns and economic geography.” Journal of Political Economy, XCIX: 483–499.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. 1998. “What’s new about the new economic geography?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14: 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Krugmann, P. and R. L. Elizondo. 1996. “Trade policy and the third world metropolis.” Journal of Development Economics, 49: 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. 1959. “Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy.” American Political Science Review, 53: 69–105.
   Google Scholar
• Omran, A. R. 1980. Population in the Arab World: Problems and Prospects. New York: United Nations Fund for Population Activities.
   Google Scholar
• Paluzie, E. 2001. “Trade policy and regional inequalities.” Papers in Regional Science, 80: 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakos, B. and J. Branda. 1989. “Metropolitan concentration in developing countries.” Kyklos, 42: 556–578.
   Google Scholar
• Petrakos, G., A. Rodriguez-Pose and A. Rovolis. 2005. “Growth, integration and regional inequality in Europe.” Environment and Planning, 37: 1837–1855.
   Google Scholar
• Puga, D. and A. J. Venables. 1999. “Agglomeration and economic development: Import substitution vs. trade liberalisation.” Economic Journal, 109: 292–311.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. and R. Ezcurra. 2010. “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis.” Journal of Economic Geography, 10(5): 619–644.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. and R. Ezcurra. 2009a. “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis.” Imdea Working Papers Series in Economics and Social Sciences no.2009/04, Imdea, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. and R. Ezcurra. 2009b. “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis.” SERC Discussion Paper No 25, SERC, London.
   Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, K. L. and E. M. Zolt. 2006. “Inequality and the evolution of institution of taxation: Evidence from the economic history of the Americas.” Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Program for Development. 2002. The Arab Human Development Report 2002: Creating Opportunities for Future Generations. New York: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Terrasi, M. 1999. “Convergence and divergence across Italian regions.” Annals of RegionalScience, 33: 491–510.
   Google Scholar
• Thisse, J. F. 2000. “Agglomeration and regional imbalance: Why? And is it bad?” Papers of the European Investment Bank, 5: 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, J. G. 1965. “Regional inequality and the process of national development: A description of patterns.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13: 3–45.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. The MENA Development Report 2010, Poor Places, Thriving People: How the Middle East and North Africa Can Rise Above Spatial Disparities. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2003. Better Governance for Development in the Middle East and North Africa: Enhancing Inclusiveness and Accountability. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. 2009 World Development Report: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. World Development Indicators Database. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar