Referencias

• Blades, M. & Cook, Z. (1994). Young children's ability to understand a model as a spatial representation. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155, 201–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. & Markson, L. (1998). Intention and analogy in children's naming of pictorial representations. Psychological Science, 9, 200–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluestein, N. & Acredolo, L. (1979). Developmental changes in map-reading skills. Child Development, 50, 691–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. H. & Tamis-Lemonda, C. S. (1995). Parent-child symbolic play: Three theories in search of an effect. Developmental Review, 15, 382–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. C. (2005). Developing an intention to communicate through drawing. Enfance, 1, 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan, T. C. & Rankin, M. P. (2002). Emergence of graphic symbol functioning and the question of domain specificity: A longitudinal training study. Child Development, 73, 359–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalke, D. E. (1998). Charting the development of representational skill: when do children know that map can lead and mislead. Cognitive Development, 13, 53–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. (1987). Rapid change in the symbolic functioning of very young children. Science, 238, 1556–1557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. (1989). Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 62, 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. (1991). Symbolic functioning in young children: Understanding pictures and models. Child Development, 62, 736–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. (1995). Early understanding and use of symbols. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 109–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. (2004). Becoming symbol mided. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 66–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. & Burns, N. M. (1994). Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 831–10.
   Google Scholar
• Deloache, J.S., Kolstad, D.V. & Anderson, K. (1991). Physical similarity and young children's understanding of scale models. Child Development, 62, 111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. & Marzolf, D. P. (1992). When a picture is not worth a thousand words: Young children's understanding of pictures and models. Cognitive Development, 7, 317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S., Peralta, O. A. & Anderson, K. (1999). Multiple factors in early symbol use: instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development, 14, 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloache, J. S. & Sharon, T. (2005). Symbols and similarity: you can get too much of a good thing. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6 (1), 33–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frye, D., Zelayo, P. D. & Burack, J. A. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: theory of mind in typical and atypical development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., Chesnick, R. & Waxman, S. R. (2005). Mother-child conversations about pictures and objects: Referring to categories and individuals. Child Development, 76, 1129–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A. & Ebeling, K. S. (1998). Shape and representational status in children's early naming. Cognition, 66, B35- B47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, S. A., Waxman, S. R. & Kleinberg, F. (2008). The role of representational status and item complexity in parent-child conversations about pictures and objects. Cognitive Development, 23 (2), 313–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittelson, W. H. (1996). Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 171–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S. (1999). Developing an understanding of external spatial representations. En I. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation. Theories and applications (pp. 297–321). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Liben, L. & Downs, R. (1992). Developing an understanding of graphic representations in children and adults. The case of GEO graphics. Cognitive Development, 7, 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liben, L. S. & Yekel, C. A. (1996). Preschoolers' Understanding of Plan and Oblique Maps: The Role of Geometric and Representational Correspondence. Child Child Development, 67 (6), 2780–2796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilliard, A. (2007). Guided participation: how mothers structure and children understand pretend play. En A. Goncu & S. Gaskins (Eds.), Play and Development: Evolutionary, Sociocultural, and Functional Perspectives (pp. 21–49). Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, E. (2003). Representar el mundo externamente. La construcción infantil de los sistemas externos de representación. Madrid: Visor.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, E. & Pozo, J. I. (2000). Más allá de las representaciones mentales: la adquisición de los sistemas externos de representación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 90, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Marzolf, D. P. & Deloache, J. S. (1994). Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representations. Child Development, 64, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, L. J. & Liben, L. S. (2007). Children's notation strategies: Going beyond assumptions about symbolic transparency. Poster pre-sentado en Fifth Biennial Meeting of the Cognitive Development Society -CDS. Santa Fe. Nuevo Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Ninio, A. & Bruner, J. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language, 5, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta, O. A. & Salsa, A. M. (2003). Instruction in early comprehension and use of a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development, 18 (2), 269–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta, O. A. & Salsa, A. M. (2004). Desarrollo temprano de la comprensión de objetos simbólicos: el papel de la instrucción. Cognitiva,16 (1), 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rivière, A. (1990). Origen y desarrollo de la función simbólica en el niño. En J. Palacios, A. Marchesi & C. Coll (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación, Vol. I Psicología evolutiva (pp. 113–130). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Sigel, I. E. (1978). The development of pictorial comprehension. En B. S. Randhawa & W. E. Coffman (Eds.), Visual learning, thinking and communication (pp. 93–111). Nueva York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salsa, A. M. & Peralta, O. A. (2005). La instrucción en la comprensión y el uso de objetos simbólicos: un estudio con fotografías. Estudios de Psicología, 26 (1), 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Salsa, A. M. & Peralta, O. A. (2007). Routes to Symbolization: Intentionality and Correspondence in Early Understanding of Pictures. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8 (1), 79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Striano, T., Tomasello, M. & Rochat, P. (2001). Social and object support for early symbolic play. Developmental Science, 4, 442–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural ecology of young children's interactions with objects and artifacts. En E. Winograd, R. Fivush & W. Hirst (Eds.), Ecological approaches to cognition: Essays in honor of Ulric Neisser (pp. 153–170). Mahawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tomassello, M. (2000). The cultural origins of human cognition. Londres: Harvard Universtiy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M. & Liszkowski, U. (2007). A new look at infant pointing. Child Development, 78 (3), 705–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., Striano, T. & Rochat, P. (1999). Do young children use objects as symbols? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 563–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troseth, G. L. (2003). Getting a clear picture: young children's understanding of a televised image. Developmental Science, 6 (3), 247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. (2000). Seing the big picture: map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developemtal Science 3 (3), 247286.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H. (2005). Spatial Symbols and Spatial Thought: Cross-Cultural, Development, and Historical Perspectives on Relation Between Map Use and Spatial Cognition. En L. Namy (Ed.), Symbol Use and Symbolic Representation (pp. 1–24). Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, U. H., Gentner, D., Liu, L. L. & Lewis, A. R. (2008). Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents. Developmental Science, 11 (1), 166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Gregg, V. H., Tan, L. S., Chamberling, M. H. & Sines, A. (2001). Connecting the Dots: Children Use of a Systematic Figure to Facilitate Mapping and Search. Developmental Psychology 37 (3), 338–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, S. John-Steiner & E. Souberman (Compiladores y traductores). Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. L., Falco, F. L., Lonigan, C. J., Fischel, J. E., Debaryshe, B. D., Valdez-Menchaca, M. C. & Caulfield, M. (1988). Accelerating language development through picture book reading. Developmental Psychology, 24, 552–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelayo, P. D. & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: The development of executive function in chidhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 21–126.
   Google Scholar