102
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

El cambio estratégico en la adquisición del conocimiento: la metodología microgenética

Strategy change in knowledge acquisition: The microgenetic methodology

Pages 169-180 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Bjorklund, D. F., Coyle, T. R. & Gaultney, J. F. (1992). Developmental differences in the acquisition and maintenance of an organizational strategy: Evidence for the utilization deficiency hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 434–438.
  • Chen, Z. & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: Acquisition and transfer of the control of variable strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120.
  • Cheshire, A., Muldoon, K. P., Francis, B., Lewis, C. M. & Ball, L. J. (2007). Modelling Change: New opportunities in the analysis of microgenetic data. Infant and Child Development, 16, 119–134.
  • Felton, M. (2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19, 35–52.
  • Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M. & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom. Informal Logic, 29 (4), 417–446.
  • Felton, M. & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Processes, 32, 135–153.
  • Flynn, E., Pine, K. & Lewis, C. (2007). Using the microgenetic method to investigate cognitive development: An Introduction. Infant and Child Development, 16, 1–6.
  • Garcia-Mila, M. & Andersen, C. (2007). Developmental Change in Note-taking during Scientific Inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1035–1058.
  • Garcia-Mila, M., Andersen, C. & Rojo, N. (2009). Representational practices and scientific inquiry. En C. Anderson,N. Scheur, M.P. Pérez Echeverría & E. Teubal (Eds.), Representational Systems and Practices as Learning Tools in Different Fields of Knowledge (pp. 167–187). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Granott, N. & Parziale, J. (Eds.) (2002). Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hofer, B. & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.
  • Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. Nueva York: Basic Books.
  • Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us? Psychological Science, 6, 133–139.
  • Kuhn, D. (2002). A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study. En N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 109–131). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kuhn, D. & Ho, V. (1980). Self-directed activity and cognitive development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 119–133.
  • Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A. & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60 (4), Serial No.245.
  • Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M. & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23, 435–451.
  • Kuhn, D. & Phelps, E. (1982). The development of problem-solving strategies. En H. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 1–144). Nueva York: Academic Press.
  • Kuhn, D., Schäuble, L. & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9 (4), 285–327.
  • Miller, P. H. & Coyle, T. R. (1999). Developmental change: Lessons from microgenesis. En E. K. Scholnick, K. Nelson, S. A. Gelman & P. H. Miller (Eds.), Conceptual development. Piaget's legacy (pp. 209–241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood (2a ed. 1962). Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Schoenfeld, A. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–14.
  • Siegler, R. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 225–273.
  • Siegler, R. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. En N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. En W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6a ed.) (pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Siegler, R. & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Thelen, E. (1992). Development as a dynamic system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 189–193.
  • Tschirgi, J. E. (1980). Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. Child Development, 51, 1–10.
  • Van Dijk, M. & Van Geert, P. (2011). Analyzing variability as a dynanic aspect of change. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 34 (2), 151–167.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1930/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press (Trabajos originales publilcados en 1930, 1933 y 1935).
  • Walton, D. N. (1989). Dialogue theory for critical thinking. Argumentation, 3, 169–184.
  • Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 347–353
  • Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149.
  • Zimmerman, C. (2005). The development of scientific reasoning skills: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.