Referencias
- Adolph, K., Robinson S., Young, J. & Gil álvarez, F. (2008). What is the shape of developmental Change. Psychological Review, 115 (3), 527–543.
- Bresson, F. & De Schonen, S. (1984). El desarrollo cognitivo: los problemas que plantea hoy en día su estudio. En R. Puche-Navarro (Ed.), Después de Piaget (pp. 213–226). Cali: Cleps.
- Colunga, E. & Smith, L. (2008). Flexibility and variability: Essential to human cognition and the study of human cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 26, 174–192.
- Combariza, E. & Puche-Navarro, R. (2009). El uso de la wavelet para el estudio de los funcionamientos inferenciales en niños pequeños. En R. Puche (Ed.), ¿Es la mente no lineal? (pp. 111–133). Cali: Fondo Editorial de la Universidad del Valle.
- Courage, M. & Howe, M. (2002). From infant to child the dynamics of cognitive change in the second year of life. Psychological Bulletin, 128 (2), 250–277.
- Fischer, K. W. & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. En W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (pp. 313–399). Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Flavell, J. H. & Wohlwill, J. F. (1969). Formal and functional aspects of cognitive development. En D. Elkind & J. H. Flavell (Eds.), Studies in cognitive development: Essays in honour of Jean Piaget (pp. 67–120). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
- Flyn, E. & Slegler, R. (2007). Using the Microgenetic Method to Investigate Cognitive Development: An Introduction Infant and Child Development, 16, 1–6.
- Gopnik, A. & Astington, J. W. (1988). Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.
- Gopnik, A. & Wellman, H. (1992). Why the child's theory of mind really is a theory. Mind and Language, 1 (1–2), 145–171.
- Guerrero, M. & Puche-Navarro, R. (2009). ¿Cambia o avanza la psicología del desarrollo hacia los sistemas dinámicos? Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 21 (2), 327–340.
- Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999). Taking development seriously. Human Development, 42, 325–327.
- Kuhn, D. (1995). Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us. Psychological Science, 4 (3), 133–140.
- Lavelli, M., Pantoja, A. P. F., Hsu, H., Messinger, D. & Fogel, A. (2005). Using microgenietic designs to study change processes. En D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 40–65). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- Miller, P. & Coyle, T. (1999). Developmental change: lessons from microgenesis. En Conceptual Development. Piaget's Legacy (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Munné, F. (2005). ¿Qué es la complejidad? Encuentros de Psicología Social, 3 (2), 6–17.
- Perner, J. (1994). Comprender la mente representacional. (Trad. cast. de M. A. Galmarini). Barcelona: Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1991).
- Piaget, J. (1975). L'équilibration des structures cognitives: probleme central du développement. París: Presses Universitaires de France (Trad. cast. de E. Bustos, La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas: problema central del desarrollo. Madrid: Siglo XXI, 1978).
- Puche-Navarro, R. & Ossa, J. C. (2006). ¿Qué hay de nuevo en el método microgenético? Más allá de las estrategias y más acá del funcionamiento cognitivo del sujeto. Summa Psicológica, 13 (2), 117–137.
- Rose L. T. & Fischer, K. W. (2009). Dynamic Development: A neo Piagetian Approach. En J. I. M. Carpendale & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget (pp. 400–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Siegler, R. (2002). Variability and infant development. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 550–557.
- Siegler, R. S. (2004). U-shaped interest in U-shaped development-and what it means. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 1–10.
- Siegler, R. & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620.
- Siegler, R. S. & Shipley, C. (1995). Variation, selection, and cognitive change. En T. Simon & G. Halford (Eds.), Developing cognitive competence: New approaches to process modelling (pp. 31–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Smith, L. & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 1 (8), 343–348.
- Van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105, 634–677.
- Van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approches and modeling of developmental processes. En J. Valsiner & K. J. Conolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental Psychology (pp. 640–672). Londres: Sage.
- Van Geert, P & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability. New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25 (4), 340–374.
- Van Dijk, M. & Van Geert, P. (2007). Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development. Infant and Child Development, 16 (7), 7–33.
- Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining functions of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.
- Wellman, H. (1995). Desarrollo de la teoría del pensamiento en los niños (Trad.: C. Boulandier). Bilbao: Desclée De Brower (Trabajo original publicado en 1990).
- Yan, Z. & Fischer, K. (2002). Always under construction. Dynamic variations in adult cognitive microdevelopment. Human Development, 45, 141–160.