References

• Aguado-Orea, J. (2004). The acquisition of morphosyntax in Spanish: Implication for current theories of development. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, S. (2000). A discourse-pragmatic explanation for argument representation in child Inuktitut. Linguistics, 38, 483–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, A. (1996). La adquisición de la negación en catalán y español. In M. Pérez-Pereira, Estudios sobre la adquisición del castellano, catalán, eusquera y gallego (pp. 231–240). Santiago de Compostela: Editorial Santiago de Compostela.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (1990). Syntactic distinctions in child language. Journal of Child Language, 17, 343–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG From below. In U. Sauerland & H.M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language? (pp. 1–29). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2008). On Phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, M. & Aguado, G. (2003). Spanish: Fernández-Aguado dabase. http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/data/romance/Spanish
   Google Scholar
• Ferreiro, E., Othenin-Girard, C., Chipman, H. & Sinclair, H. (1976). How do children handle relative clauses? Archives de Psychologie, 44, 229–266.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D. (1998). Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, V., Sebastian, N. & Soto, P. (2002). Negative commands in Spanish-speaking children: No need for recourse to relativized minimality (a reply to Grinstead, 2000). Journal of Child Language, 29, 393–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, S. (2000). On the acquisition of leftward building recursive possessive structures in English. Honors Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Gillete, J., Gleitman, H., Gleitman, L. & Lederer, A. (1999). Human simulations of vocabulary learning. Cognition, 73, 135–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R., Cassidy, K., Nappa, R., Papafragou, A. & Trueswell, J. C. (2005). Hard words. Language Learning and Development, 1, 23–64.
   Google Scholar
• Grinstead, J. (2000). Constraints on the computational component vs. grammar in the lexicon: a discussion of Bates & Goodman. Journal of Child Language, 27, 737–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, C. (2008). Structural ambiguity and AP/PP recursion in language acquisition. Master Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Guerriero, A.M. S., Oshima-Takane, Y. & Kuriyama, Y. (2006). The development of referential choice in English and Japanese: a discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 33, 823–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., & Thornton, R. (2007, August). Fragments of child grammar. Paper presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, King's College London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., Chomsky, C. & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science, 298 (5598), 1569–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiraga, M. (2009). Acquisition of recursive verbal compound nouns. Master Thesis. University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, N. (2009). A theory of syntax: minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laka, I. (1990). Negation in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Liceras, J., Díaz, L. & Salooma-Robertson, T. (2002). The compounding parameter and the word-marker hypothesis. In A. T. Pérez-leroux & J. M. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax (pp. 207–235). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, S. (2010). Negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Master Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• López Ornat, S., Fernández, A., Gallo, P. & Mariscal, S. (Eds.) (1994). Adquisición de la lengua española. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, G. & Longa, V. M. (2009). Beyond generative geneticism: Rethinking language acquisition from a developmentalist point of view. Lingua, 119, 1300–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthei, E. M. (1982). The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences. Cognition, 11, 201–332.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, J. (2004). Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 661–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesetsky, D. (2009). Against taking linguistic diversity at “face value”: Commentary to Evans & Levinson. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 32, 464–465.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. (2006). Watching noun phrases grow. In V. van Geenhoven (Ed.), Semantics in Acquisition (pp. 37–62). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. (2007). The prism of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. (2009). The minimalist microscope. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord & G.-M. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston University Conference in Language Development 33 (pp. 24–48). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. & Snyder, W. (2004). Recursion as an analytic device in acquisition. In J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (Eds.), Proceedings of GALA 2003 (Generative Approache to Language Acquisition) (pp. 401–408). Utrecht: LOT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper, T. & Speas, M. (Eds.) (in press). Recursion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 437–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. & Paoli, S. (2004). Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, H. & Roeper, T. (1994). The place of linguistic theory in the theory of language acquisition and language impairment. In I. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: issues in the theory of language acquisition (pp. 305–329). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W. (2007). Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, W., Senghas, A. & Inman, K. (2001). Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition, 9, 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R. & Jensen, B. (2007, September). Fragments of child grammar. Paper presented at the Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Van DER Hulst, H. G. (Ed.) (2010). Recursion and Human Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hout, A. (2008). Acquiring telicity crosslinguistically. In M. Bowerman & P. Brown (Eds.), Crosslinguistic perspective on argument structure: Implications for learnability (pp. 255–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, L. (2006). Short negative replies in Spanish. In L. Bettelou & J. van De Wijer (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 23(pp. 199–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, L. (2001). Aspectual influences on early tense comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28, 661–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar