References

• Acher, A., Arcá, M. & Sanmartí, N. (2007). Modeling as a teaching learning process for understanding materials. A case study in primary education. Science Education, 91, 398–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Unger, C. & Jay, E. (1989). An experiment is when you try and see if it works: middle school conception of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 514–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M., Feltovitch, P. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation in physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 417–452), New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweinruber, H. A. & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlen, K. (2007). Conceptions and artefacts: Children's understanding of the earth in the presence of visual representations. Doctoral Thesis in Education. Stockholm University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno J. (1988). Situations, mental models and generative knowledge. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science. Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halldén, O., Scheja, M. & Haglund, L. (2008). The contextuality of knowledge. An intentional approach to meaning making and conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 509–532). London: Taylor & Francis Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hatano, G. (1994). Introduction. Human Development, 37, 189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano, G. & Inagaki, K. (2003). When is conceptual change intended? A cognitive-sociocultural view. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 407–427). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. (1966). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Indiana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, B. & Pintrich, P. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67 (1), 88–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsson, T., Gillberg, C., Arvidsson, T. & Broberg, A. G. (2002). The Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Depression Self-Rating Scale (DSRS) as measures of depression and suicidality among adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. (1994). Coloring the field: gender, ‘race’ and the politics of fieldwork. The Professional Geographer 46, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R., Russell, J., Jones, J., Marx, N. & Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In S. Vosniadou, E. de Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning Environments (pp. 41–60). Mahawh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Amsel E. & O'loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakopoulou, N. & Vosniadou, S. (2012). The relation between conceptual change in physical science, theory of mind and personal epistemology and implications for science instruction. Paper presented in the 8th International Conference on Conceptual Change, September 1–4, University of Trier, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, J. (1983). The role of problem representation in physics. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75–98). Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Shauble, L. & Putz, A. (2000). Designing classrooms that support inquiry. In J. Ministrel L & E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 80–99). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., Schäuble, L., Strom, D. & Pligge, M. (2001). Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In S. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 39–74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Merenluoto, K. & Lehtinen, E. (2002). Conceptual change in mathematics: Understanding the real numbers. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 233–258). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Merenluoto, K. & Palonen, T. (2007). When we clashed with the real numbers: Complexity of conceptual change in number concept. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 247–263). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S. & Morrison, M. (Eds.) (1999). Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Mental modelling, in conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change (pp. 391–416). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavan, K. & Glaser, R. (1995). Model-based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science Education, 79, 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (2012). Learning without lessons: Opportunities to expand knowledge. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35 (2), 233–241. [Trans. into Spanish by A. Bautista & B. Rogoff, Aprender sin lecciones: oportunidades para expandir el conocimiento. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 35 (2), 242–250].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (2001). Situating Cognition. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 10 (1), 27–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning represen-tations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323, 533–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. (1994). Minding action: conceiving of the world versus participating in cultural practices. Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 14, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R., Schoultz, J. & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk. A discursive approach to conceptual knowledge and conceptual change in children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1998). mental models of the earth, sun and the moon: Indian children's cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoultz, J., Säljö, R. & Wyndhamn, J. (2001). Heavenly talk: discourse, artifacts, and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C. & Hennesey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students' epistemologies of science: The impact of school experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18 (3), 349–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among three aspects of first-year college students epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (8), 747–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L. & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A comparison of two approaches to teaching students about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15 (3), 317–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Snir, J. & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight/density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9 (3), 221–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi,. & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students' reasoning about rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28 (2), 181–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 377–406). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, CH., Dimitrakopoulou, A. & Papademitriou, E. (2001). Designing Learning Environments to Promote Conceptual Change in Science, Learning and Instruction, 11 (4–5), 381–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I. & Ikospentaki, K. (2004.) Modes of Knowing and Ways of Reasoning in Elementary Astronomy. Cognitive Development, 19, 203–222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Skopeliti, I. & Ikospentaki, K. (2005). reconsidering the role of artifacts in reasoning: childrens' understanding of the globe as a model of the earth. Learning and Instruction, 15, 333–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiser, M. & Smith, C. L. (2008). Learning and teaching about matter in grades K-8: When should the atomic-molecular theory be introduced? In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), The international handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 205–239). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar