Referencias

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 User's Guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Dev. Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, I. H. & Teng, G. (1989). Factoring items and factoring scales are different: Spurious evidence for multidimensionality due to item categorization. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 467–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., Levant, R., Mcmillan, K., Keheller, W. & Sellers, A. (2005). Impact of gender role conflict, traditional masculine ideology, alexithymia, and age on men's attitudestoard psychological help seeking. Psychology and Men and masculinity, 6, 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Boomsma, A. (1987). The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation model. En P. Cuttance & R. Ecob (Eds.), Structural equation modelling by example (pp. 160–188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Branon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood and what it is done for us lately. En D. David & R. Branon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Branon, R. & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes toward masculinity. Psychological Documents, 14, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn, S. & Ward, Z. (2005). Men's conformity to tradictional masculinity and relationship to satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 254–263.
   Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Catell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. & Messerschmidt, J. (1995). Hegemonic Masculinity. Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.
   Google Scholar
• David, D. S. & Branon, S. (Eds.) (1976). The male sex role. Londres: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., Del Olmo, I. & Rodríguez, A. (2007). Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: estado actual de la cuestión. Psicothema, 19, 357–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., Tokar, D., Good, G. & Snell, A. (1998). More on the structure of male role norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 135–155.
   Google Scholar
• Garaigordobil, M. (2009). A Comparative Analysis of Empathy in Childhood and Adolescence: Gender Differences and Associated Socio-emotional Variables. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9, 217–235
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P. Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S. & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: More negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57, 55–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, G. & Sherrod, N. (2001). The Psychology of Men and masculinity: Research status and future directions. En R. Unger (Ed.), Psychology of Women and Gender (pp. 201–214). New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. & Klmmel, M. S. (2006). Changing studies on men and masculinities En Handbook on Gender and Women's Studies (pp. 53–69). California: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Jakupcak, M., Salters, K., Grazt, K. & Roemer, L. (2003). Masculinity and emotionality: An investigation of men's primary and secondary emocional responding. Sex Roles, 49, 111–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL< 7 user's guid. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klmmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. Nueva York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klmmel, M. S. (2001). Thegenderedsociety. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F. & Hecht, M. L. (2002). Gender labels and gender identity as predictors of drug use among ethnically diverse middle school students. Youth and Society, 33, 442–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenney, E. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. En J. Robinson, R. Shaver & S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 573–660) San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levant, R. F. & Pollack, W. S. (Eds.) (1995). A new psychology of men. Nueva York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Stinson, R., Hernandez, J., Shepard, S. & Hagg, S. (2009). A Qualitative examination of masculinity, homelessnes, and social class among men in a trasitional shelter. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 10, 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Mccreary, D. R., Newcomb, M. D. & Sadava, S. W. (1998). Dimensions of the male gender role: A confirmatory analysis in men and women. Sex Roles, 39, 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, R. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. New Jersey: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, R. & Ahlawat, K. S. (1974). Difficulty factors in binary data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 82–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya, M. & Expósito, F. (2001). Nuevas formas, viejos intereses: neosexismo en varones españoles. Psicothema, 13, 642–649.
   Google Scholar
• Moya, M., Expósito, F. & Padilla, J. (2006). Revisión de las propiedades psicométricas de las versiones larga y reducida de la escala sobre ideología de género. Internacional Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 709–727.
   Google Scholar
• Muñiz, J. & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests. Papeles del Psicólogo, 66, 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Murnen, S., Wright, C. & Kaluzny, G. (2002). If ‘boys will be boys’, then girls will be victims? A meta-analitic review of the research that relates masculine ideology to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 46, 359–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443–460.
   Google Scholar
• O'neil, J. & Egan, J. (1993). Abuses of power against women: Sexism, gender role conflict, and psychological violence. En E. Piel (Ed.), Women, relationships, andpower: Implications for counselling (pp. 49–78). Alexandria, VA: American Counselling Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parent, M. C. & Moradi, B. (2009). Confirmatory factor análisis of the conformity to masculine norms inventory and development of the confirmatory to mascculine norms inventory-46. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 10, 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. En R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). Nueva York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H. & Sawyer, J. (Eds) (1974). Men and Masculinity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L. & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology and its correlates. En S. Oskamp & M. Constanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in social psychology (pp. 85–110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L. & Ku, L. C. (1994). Attitudes toward male roles among adolescent males: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles, 30, 481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynes-Eudy, R. (2000). Usign Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Differential Reliability and Validity: An Empirical Demostration. SEM, 7 (1), 124–141.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, M. & Heppner, P. (1991). Gender role, gender role conflict and psychological well-being among gay men. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 47, 85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiler, A. (2004). Thirty years after the discovery of gender: Psychological concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiler, A. (2006). Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among adult men and women. Sex Roles, 54, 767–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychosocial dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Texas: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tager, D. & Good, G. (2005). Italian and American masculinities: A comparison of masculine gender role norms. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 6, 264–274.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. H. & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of males role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H. & Ferrera, D. L. (1992). Men and Masculinities: scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexsim: Plus ça change, Plus c'est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, J. & Brittan-Powell, C. (2001). Men's attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender-related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, D., Tokar, D. & Fisher, A. (2000). what are eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring' Underliying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinities, 1, 98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, N. G. (2001). MicroFACT 2.0: A microcomputer factor analysis program for orderedpolytomous data and mainframe size problems. Minnessota: Assessment System Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar