Referencias

• Agazarian, Y. M. (1989). Group-as-a-whole systems theory and practice. Group, 13, 131–154.
   Google Scholar
• Agazarian, Y. M. (1992). Contemporary theories of group psychotherapy: A systems approach to the group-as-a-whole. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42, 177–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agazarian Y. M. & Yanoff, S. J. (1996). Teoría de sistemas y grupos pequeños. En H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Terapia de grupo (pp. 36–49). Madrid: Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1976). Experiences in groups. Nueva York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Lineal Models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. M & Quinn, R. E (1999). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Based on the Competing Values Framework. Realing, MA: Addison-Wesley Puvlishing Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1986). Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action. Americal journal of Sociology, 91 (6), 1309–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw, J. & Kreft, I. G. G. (1986). Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe, A. (1998). Las teorías de la acción social. En B. Ore & R. Nisbet (Comps.), Historias del análisis sociológico (pp. 412–476). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Eds.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, H. (1972). Analytic groups therapy and general system theory. En C. J. Sager & H. S. Kaplan (Eds.), Progress in group and family therapy (pp. 35–52). Nueva York: Brunner-Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, H. (1981). Living group: Group psychotherapy and general system theory. Nueva York: Brunner-Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel Statistical Models. Nueva York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• House, R., Rousseau, D. M. & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The Meso Paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 71–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J. (1988). Power and personality in complex organizations. En B.M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 305–358). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G. & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without responses bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1977). Psicología Social de las organizaciones. México: Trillas.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K.J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentagling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Klein, K. J. (2000) A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. En J. K. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1935). Dynamic Theory of personality. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Sciences. Nueva York: Harper y Row.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. Nueva York: McGraw Hill
   Google Scholar
• Munich, R. L. (1996). Dinámica de grupos. En H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Terapia de grupo (pp. 23–35). Madrid: Panamericana.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. C., Rosel, J. & Jara, P. (2000). Modelos de regersión multinivel: Aplicación en psicología escolar. Psicothema, 12, 487–494.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, R., Rasbash, J. & Goldstein, H. (1991). ML3. Sofware for three-level analysis. User's guide for V.2. Londres: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. & House, R. J. (1994). Meso organizacional behavior: Avoiding three fundamental biases. En C. L. Cooper & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 13–30). Londres: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spronck, W. E. E. C. & Compernolle, T. H. L. (1997). System Theory and family therapy: from a critique on system theory to a theory on system change. Contemporary Family Therapy, 19, 147–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. & Sutton, R. I. (1992). Macro organizational psychology. En J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in theory and research (pp. 121–148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. S. & Spencer, B. A. (1989). Cross-level research: An empirical technique for multilevel analysis in organizacional research. Behavioral Science, 34, 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Formulations, developments and applications. Londres: Brazilier.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely couple systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1992). Agenda settings in organizational behavior: A theory-focused approach. Journal of Management Inquiry, 1, 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1952). Science and the modern world. Nueva York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar