Referencias

• Arnold, J. (1996). The psychological contract: A concept in need of closer scrutiny? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 511–520.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Nueva York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. E. & Siehl, C. (1997). The future of human resource management: March and Simon (1958) revisited. Human Resource Management, 36, 57–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, C. (1995). Rethinking employment. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33, 545–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CONSEJO ECONÓMICO Y SOCIAL (2003). Memoria sobre la situación socioeconómica y laboral de España 2002. Madrid: CES.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2001). Managers: Caught in the middle of a psychological contract muddle. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington DC, August.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (1998). The psychological contract in the UK pubic sector: Employer and employee obligations and contract fulfilment. En S. J. Havlovic (Ed.), Academy of Management best paper proceedings, Vol. 58 (disponible en CD).
   Google Scholar
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. & Kessler, I. (2002). Contingent and non-contingent working in local government: contrasting psychological contracts. Public Administration, 80, 77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meuse, K. P., Bergman, T. J. & Lester, S. W. (2001). An investigation of the relational component of the psychological contract across time, generation, and employment status. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13, 102–118.
   Google Scholar
• Dolado, J. J., García-serrano, C. & Jimeno, J. F. (2002). Drawing Lessons from the boom of temporary jobs in Spain. The Economic Journal, 112, 270–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, F. J., Martínez-tur, V. & Peiró, J. M. (2001). Tendencias y controversias en el futuro de la gestión y el desarrollo de los recursos humanos. En E. Agulló & A. Ovejero (Coords.), Trabajo, individuo y sociedad (pp. 165–201). Madrid: Pirámide.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, D. (1998a). Is the psychological contract worth taking seriously? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 649–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest, D. (1998b). On meaning, mathapor and the psychological contract: a response to Rousseau. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 673–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herriot, P. (1992). The Career Management Challenge. Londres: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Herriot, P. & Pemberton, C. (1995). New Deals. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behaviour: Its elementary forms. Nueva York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Kochan, T. A. (1997). Rebalancing the role of human resources. Human Resource Management, 36, 121–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S., Turnley, W., Bloodgood, J. & Bolino, M. (2002). Not seeing eye to eye: differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 39–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Mcclear, K. & Taylor, S. (1998). Psychological contract breach and the employment exchange: Perceptions from employees and employers. En S. J. Havlovic (Ed.), Academy of Management best paper proceedings, Vol. 58 (disponible en CD).
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, D. J. & Makin, P. J. (2000). The psychological contract, organisational commitment and job satisfaction of temporary staff. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 21, 84–91.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, L. J. & Brewerton, P. M. (2000). Psychological contracts: employee relations for the twenty-first century? International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 15, 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Millward, L. J. & Hopkins, L. (1998). Psychological contracts, Organizational and Job commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1530–1556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrman, S. A. & Lawler, E. E. (1997). Transforming the human resource function. Human Resource Management, 36, 157–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORDÓÑEZ, M. (1997). La nueva gestión de recursos humanos. Madrid: Gestión 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied Contracts in Organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1990). New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contracts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations. Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. & Tijoriwala, S. A. (1998). Assesing psychological contracts: issues, alternatives and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 679–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfman, M. P. & Dean, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Management, 17, 681–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. (1999). “Postmodern” manors: welfare capitalism at the end of the century. Industrial Relations, 38, 135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekleab, A. G. & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Aren't there two parties in the in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences organization-employee agreement on contract obligationsand violations. Paper present at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC, August.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. Nueva York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 692–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar