Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 22, 2007 - Issue 1
466
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes

Adaptation of The Social Dominance Orientation scale into Spanish: Validation of Group-Based Dominance and Opposition to Equality as underlying factors

Pages 3-15 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014

Referencias

  • Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sandford, N. (1950) The authoritarian personality. Buenos Aires: Proyección.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1981). Enemies of freedom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Altemeyer, B. (1998). The authoritarian spectra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Baron, R. & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1191.
  • Bentler, M. P. & Dudgeon, P. (1996). Covariance structure analysis: Statistical pratice, theory and directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 563–592.
  • Browne, M. W. & Kudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assesing model fit. En K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Bustillos, A. & Silván-ferrero, M. P. (2005). Social dominance and Authoritarianism: Differential mediation with Blatant and Subtle Prejudice. 14th General Meeting EAESP. Wuzburg: Alemania.
  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. En M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advance in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Duriez, B. & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213.
  • Henry, P. J., Sidanius, J., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. (2005). Social Dominance Orientation, Authoritarianism, and Support for Intergroup Violence Between the Middle East and America. Political Psychology, 26, 569–583.
  • Jöreskong, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1979). Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models. Cambridge, MA: ABT Books.
  • Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33 (1), 1–27.
  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R. & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. Political Psychology, 25 (6), 881–920.
  • Jost, J. T. & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.
  • Jost, J. T., Fitzsimons, G. I., Kay, A. C., Greenberg, J., Koole, S. L. & Pyszczynski, T. (2004). The Ideological Animal: A System Justification View. En Handbook of Experimental Existential Psychology (pp. 263–283). Nueva York: Guilford Press.
  • Jost, J. T. & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of social Psychology, 13, 111–153.
  • Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self- esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
  • Lippa, R. & Arad, S. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493.
  • Overbeck, J., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C. & Flizik, A. (2004). Resistant vs. acquiescent responses to ingroup inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 35–54.
  • Petticrew, T. F. & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
  • Pratto, F., Liu, J., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H. & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409.
  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social Dominance Orientation: A Personality Variable Predicting Social and Political Attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
  • Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M. & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49–68.
  • Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 102–133.
  • Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C. M. & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. En J. T. Jost & B. Major, Psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307–331). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J. & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30 (1), 41–67.
  • Sidanius, J., Liu, J., Pratto, F. & Shaw, J. (1994). Social dominance orientation, hierarchy-attenuators and hierarchy-enhancers: Social theory and the criminal justice system. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 338–366.
  • Sidanius, J. & Peña, Y. (2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tale of asymmetry. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 782–790.
  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: University Press.
  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: a new synthesis. En J. Jost & J. Sidanius, Political Psychology (pp. 315–332). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998–1100.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Brief, D. (1995). Group dominance and the political psychology of gender: A cross-cultural comparison. Political Psychology, 16, 381–396.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. & Rabinowitz, J. L. (1994). Gender, ethnic status, and ideological asymmetry: A social dominance interpretation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 194–216.
  • Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C. & Levin, S. (2004). The Social Dominance Theory: Its Adenda and Method. Political Psychology, 25 (6), 845–800.
  • Silván-ferrero, M. P. & Montes-Berges, B. (2004). Evaluación de la personalidad autoritaria: Estudio piloto de la escala de Altemeyer. VII European Conference on Psychological Assesment, Málaga.
  • Van Hiel A. & Mervielde, I. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965–976.
  • Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere, M. & Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 824–837.
  • Whitley, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 126–134.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.