Referencias

• Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of Human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benze, J. J. & Declerq, E. R. (1985). Content of television spot ads for female candidates, Journalism Quarterly, 62, 278–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, A. G. (2000). The effects of message theme, policy explicitness, and candidate gender, Communication Quarterly, 48, 159–173.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, D. & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be. Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 665–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (1985). Women as Candidate in American Politics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. J. (1994). Women as Candidate in American Politics. 2da. Ed. Revisada. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuadrado Guirado, I. (2007). Estereotipos de género. En J. F. Morales, E. Gaviria, M. Moya & I. Cuadrado (Coords.), Psicología Social. (3a ed., pp. 243–266). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Darcy, R., Welch, S. & Clark, J. (1987). Women, electronics, and representation. Nueva York: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication, Public Opinion Quarterly, 47, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1996). The third-person effect revisited, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. & Lewis, L. (1984). The structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Towards Female Leaders, Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G. & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Beaudoux, V., D'adamo, O. & Slavonsky, G. (2005). Comunicación Política y Campañas Electorales. Barcelona: Gedisa.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidences, Psychological Bulletin, 86, 616–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. M. & Zeitz, H. (1988). The public's view of the impact of the mass media: a test of the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 457–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age: The transformation of Political Speechmaking. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Cartee, K. S. & Copeland, G. A. (1997). Inside Political Campaigns. Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. & White, A. B. (1994). Communication styles and female candidates: A study of the political advertising during the 1986 senate elections, Journalism Quarterly, 71, 321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. (1993). Gender differences in campaign messages: The political advertisements of men and women candidates for de U.S. Senate, Political Research Quarterly, 46, 482–502.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. (1994). Does gender make a difference? An experimental examination of sex stereotypes and press patterns in campaigns, American Journal of Political Science, 38, 162–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L., Myers, S. L., Pipps, V. & Hunter, J. (1985). Sex role perceptions and televised political advertising: Comparing male and female candidates, Women and Politics, 4, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. (1964). The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Leeper, M. S. (1991). The impact of prejudice on female candidates. An experimental look at voter inference, American Politics Quarterly, 19, 248–261.
   Google Scholar
• López-sáez, M. (2003). Cómo percibimos la influencia de los medios de comunicación: el efecto tercera persona. En J.F. Morales Domínguez & C. Huici Casal (Dirs.), Estudios d Psicología Social (cap. 9, pp. 293–316). Madrid: Ediciones UNED.
   Google Scholar
• López-sáez, M. & Morales, J. F. (1995). Gender stereotyping in the Spanish population: Looking into de future. En I. Amancio & C. Nogueira (Eds.), Gender, management and science (pp. 151–168). Braga: Instituto de Educaçao e Psicología.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, M. (1991). Persuasion and politics. The social psychology of public opinion. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Molero, F. (2004). El liderazgo. En C. Huici Casal & J. F. Morales Domínguez (Dirs.), Psicología dr Grupos I. Estructura y Procesos (cap. 5, pp. 141–170). Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1996). Women, media and politics. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A. & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S. & Friedenberg, R. V. (1983). Political Campaign Communication. Nueva York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S. & Sabourin, T. (1993). Sex still counts: Women's use of television advertising during the decade of the 1980's. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 21, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (1994). Political advertising in the “year of the woman”: Did X mark the spot? En E. A. Cook, S. Thomas & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The year of the woman: Myths and realities (pp. 197–215). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar