Referencias

• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J. & Atwater, L. E. (1996). The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. & Wright, E. O. (2000). The glass ceiling hypothesis: A comparative study of the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Gender & Society, 14, 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, K. R. (1999). Divided labours: An evolutionary view of women at work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, K. R. (2002). Biology at work: Rethinking sexual equality. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuadrado, I. (2004). Valores y rasgos estereotípicos de género de mujeres líderes. Psicothema, 16, 279–284.
   Google Scholar
• Degroot, T., Kiker, D. S. & Cross, T. C. (2000). A meta-analysis to review organizational outcomes related to charismatic leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17, 356–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B. & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W. & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceived change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B. & Avolio, B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. En B. J. Avolio & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead (pp. 35–66). Londres: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2003). More women at the top: The impact of gender roles and leadership style. En U. Pasero (Ed.), Gender: From costs to benefits (pp. 151–169). Opladen, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. En D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–93). Londres: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003a). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 807–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003b). Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 851–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2004). Women and men as leaders. En J. Antonakis, R. J. Sternberg & A. T. Cianciolo (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 279–301). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard University Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Diekman, A. B., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. & Koenig, A. M. (2004). Gender gaps in sociopolitical attitudes: A social psychological analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 796–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. & Van Engen, M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire: A meta-analysis comparing men and women. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 569–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J. & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 125–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G. & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. En T. Eckes & H. M. Trautmer (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• FEDERAL GLASS CEILING COMMISSION. (1995). Good for business: making full use of the nation's human capital: the environmental scan: A fact- finding report of the Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. (2002). Fertility pathways in Australia: Relationships, opportunities, work and parenting. Canberra: Commonwealth department of family and community services.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R. (2006). Identidad de género y nivel de aspiraciones profesionales en alumnos universitarios. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 23, 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R. & López-zafra, E. (2002). Percepción y evaluación de la mujer en puestos de liderazgo como explicación de la discriminación de la mujer en puestos de dirección. Revista de Psicología Social Aplicada, 12, 21–52.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R. & López-zafra, E. (2006a). Congruencia de rol de género y liderazgo: El papel de las atribuciones causales sobre el éxito y el fracaso. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38, 245–257.
   Google Scholar
• García-retamero, R. & López-zafra, E. (2006b). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-retamero, R. & López-zafra, E. (en prensa). Incongruity between feminine and leadership roles: A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions and causal attributions. Journal of Cross Cultural Pscyhology.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesen, S. (1993). La ventaja de ser mujer: Formas femeninas de liderazgo. Barcelona: Granica.
   Google Scholar
• HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT (2006). Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. Obtenido el 3 de Noviembre de 2006, en http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/pdfs/report/HDR06-complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA (INE) (2007). Mujeres y Hombres en España 2007. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales.
   Google Scholar
• MEC (2008). Académicas en cifras 2007. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Último acceso, 18 julio, 2008 en, www.mec.es/academicaspdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. A. (1999). The sex segregation of occupations: Prospects for the 21st century. En G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 125–144). Londres: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, M. F. (1994). Management and gender: Issues and attitudes. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, L. A., López-zafra, E. & Eagly, A. H. (2006). Envisioning oneself as a leader: Comparisons of women and men in Spain and the United States. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30,312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komblit, A. & Mendes-Diz, A. (1998). El burnout en el personal de enfermería de unidades de cuidados intensivos. Estudios del Trabajo, 16, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E. Jr., Lieb, P. & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, L. & Wintermantel, M. (1986). Leadership Ms.- Qualified: I.- The gender bias in everyday and scientific thinking. En C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of leadership. (pp. 171–197). Nueva York. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lips, H. M. (2000). College students' visions of power and possibility as moderated by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips, H. M. (2001). Envisioning positions of leadership: The expectations of university students in Virginia and Puerto Rico. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 799–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-sáez, M. (1994). Procesos culturales e individuales implicados en la estereotipia de género. Una aproximación empírica a la elección de carreta. Revista de Psicología Social, 9, 213–230.
   Google Scholar
• López-zafra, E. (1999). Liderazgo femenino: Nuevas pautas para un nuevo milenio. En M. A. Bel (Ed.), Ecofeminismo: Un reencuentro con la naturaleza (pp. 43–61). Jaén: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén.
   Google Scholar
• López-zafra, E. & Morales, J. F. (1998). Liderazgo carismático en organizaciones productivas. En R. A. Baron & D. Byrne (Eds.), Psicología social (pp. 532–534). Madrid: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• López-zafra, E. & Morales, J. F. (1999). Niveles de análisis en el estudio de liderazgo carismático. Revista de Psicología Social, 14, 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• López-zafra, E. & Morales, J. F. (2007). Liderazgo democrático y transformacional en las organizaciones: De las perspectivas de Lewin a Bass. En M. P. Berrios & M. M. Ramos (Coords.), Investigación en Psicología Vol. II. Investigación en Psicología Aplicada (pp. 159–184). Jaén: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Jaén.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G. & Sivasubramanian, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the M. L. Q. literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, P. K., Bradley, L. & Guthrie, D. (2006). Challenging the rhetoric of choice in maternal labour-force participation: Preferred versus contracted work hours. Gender, Work and Organization, 13, 470–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson, P. (1997). Poder, género y organizaciones: ¿Se valora a la mujer en la empresa? Madrid: Narcea.
   Google Scholar
• Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Busines Review, 68, 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. A. (2002). Race, gender, and authority in the workplace: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 509–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swim, J. K. & Sanna, L. J. (1996). He's skilled, she's lucky: A meta-analysis of observers' attributions for women's and men's successes and failures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 507–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vlanen, A. E. M. & Fischer, A. H. (2002). Illuminating the glass ceiling: The role of organizational culture preferences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 315–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and Gender Advantage, The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 643–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, R. P. (2003). In search of gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 835–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O., Baxter, J. & Birkelund, G. E. (1995). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross-national study. American Sociological Review, 60, 407–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar