Referencias

• Abric, J. C. (1993). Central system, peripheral system: Their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 75–78.
   Google Scholar
• Abric, J. C. (1994). Pratiques sociale et représentations. París: PUF:
   Google Scholar
• Abric, J. C. (1999). Psychologie de la communication. Théories et méthodes. París: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Abric, J.-C. (2003). La recherche du noyau central et de la zone muette des représentations sociales. En J. C. Abric (Ed.), Méthodes d'étude des représentations sociales, Ramonville Saint-Agne (pp. 59–80). Saint-Agne de Ramonville: Erès.
   Google Scholar
• Abric, J. C. & Guimelli, C. (1998). Representations sociales et effects de contexte. Connexions, 72, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beugre, C. (2007). A cultural perspective on organizational justice. Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J. (2002). Making sense of procedural fairness: how high procedural fairness can reduce or heithen the influence of outcome favorabilitiy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 58–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIS (2007). Barómetro de Septiembre de 2007. PREGUNTA 12: Quisiera que me dijera si está Ud. muy de acuerdo, bastante, poco o nada de acuerdo con cada una de las siguientes medidas. Y PREGUNTA 13: De la medidas que aparecen en esta tarjeta, ¿cuál cree ud. que debería ser prioritaria? [Archivo de datos]. Disponible en http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=7700
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W. (1990). Les Représentations Sociales. En R. Ghiglione, C. Bonnet & J. F. Richard (Eds.), Traité de Psychologie Cognitive: Cognition, représentation, communication, 3 (pp. 111–174). París: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W. (1993) Logiques Sociales dans le Raisonnement. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestle.
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W. & Staerklé, C. (2001). From social to political psychology: The societal Approach. En K. Monroe (Ed.), Political Psychology (pp. 151–172). Nueva York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C. (1994). Aspects périphériques des représentations sociales. En C. Guimelli (Ed.), Structures et transformations des représentations sociales (pp. 85–115). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestle.
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C. (1999). La représentation sociale comme système normatif. Psychologie et Société, 1, 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C., Guimelli, CH. & Abric, J-C. (2006). Effets de masquage dans l'expression d'une représentation sociale. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie sociale, 69, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Flament, C. & Moliner, P. (1989). Contribution expérimentale à la theorie du noyau central d'une représentation. En J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales. 2. Représentation et processus cognitifs (pp. 139–141). Cousset: DelVal.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzach, Y., Weber, Y. & Or, P. (1997). Message framing and buying behavior: on the difference between artificial and natural environment, Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 19–95.
   Google Scholar
• Guimelli, CH. (1999). La pensée sociale. París: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Guimelli, C. (2002). Etude expérimentale du rôle de l'implication de soi dans les modalités de raisonnement intervenant dans le cadre des représentations sociales. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 15 (1), 129–162.
   Google Scholar
• Guimelli, C. & Deschamps, J. C. (2000). Effets de contexte sur la production d'associations verbales: Le cas des représentations sociales des Gitans. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 47–48, 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. (1997). Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivation principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30, 1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, T., Klein, R. & Strautman, T. (1985). Self-concept discrepancy theory: A psychological model for distinguishing among different aspects of depression and anxiety. Social Cognition, 3 (1), 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A., Stephan, E., Ganzach, Y. & Hershkovitz, M. (2004). The effect of regulatory focus on the shape of probability-weighting function: Evidence from a cross-modality matching method. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 95, 20–39.
   Google Scholar
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity Theory?. New approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. En K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenbers & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 27–53). Nueva York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L. & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 149–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahreswaran, D. & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involment, Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. & Chaicken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on Breast Self-examination attitude, intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 52, 500–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse son image et son Public. París: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. En R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quattrone, G. & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82, 719–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, CH., Liu, J. & Kirkwood, S. (2006). Toward a Social Representations Theory of Attitude Change: The Effect of Message Framing on General and Specific Attitudes toward Equality and Entitlement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, J. F., Gil de Montes, L. & Elejabarrieta, F. (2004). Creencias y actitudes hacia la inmigración: Estereotipos, prejuicio y regulaciones normativas. Revista de Psicología Social, 19, 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Verges, P., Tyszka; T. & Verges, P. (1994). Noyau central, Saillance et Proprietes Structurales. Papers on Social Representations, 3, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (1994). Fields of Research and Socio-Genesis of Social Representations: a Discussion of Criteria and Diagnostics. Social Science Information, 33, 199–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Elejabarrieta, F. & Valencia, J. F. (1994). Estabilidad en las representaciones sociales de paz y guerra en dos paises. Revista de Psicología Socialy Metodología, 10 (2) 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Valencia, J. & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the “hot” stable core of social representations. A structural analysis of word associations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 331–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar