Referencias

• Allen, N. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, R. R. & Mouton, J. S. (1985). The Managerial Grid III: The Key to Leadership Excellence. Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identitties. En S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47–68). Nueva York: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (1969), Identification and some conditions of organisational involvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 346–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G. & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (1983). On the various and changing meanings of organizational membership: A field study of organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 50, 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A. & Balmer, J. M. T. (2007). Social identity, Organizational Identity and corporate Identity: Toward an Integrated Understanding of Proceses Patternings and Products. British Journal of Management. 18, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D. & Van DEN Heuvel, H. (1998). Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 717–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M. (2001). Personal initiative (PI): The theoretical concept and empirical findings. En M. Erez, u. Kleinbeck & H. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a global economy (pp. 99–110). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frese, M. & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburguer, T., Leng, K. & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 70, 139–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A. & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Nier, J. A., Ward, C. M. & Banker, B. S. (1999). Across Cultural Divides: The value of a superordinate identity. En D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural Divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 173–212). Nueva York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, T., Jones, L. & Paulsen, N. (2002). Multiple Targets of Organizational Identification: The role of Identification Congruency. Journal of Articles in Support of the Null Hypothesis, 1, 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. & Schneider, B. (1972), Correlates of organizational identification as a function of career pattern and organisational type. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 340–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. A., Power, C. & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., Hains, S. C. & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference and leader stereotypically effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. & Martín, R. (2003). Social identity analysis of leader-member relations: reconciling self-categorization and leader member exchange theories leadership. En S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work. Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 139–154). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. & Terry, D. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25 (1), 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity proceses in organizational contexts. Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M. (1969). Organizational identification of scientists. Academy of management Journal, 12, 327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M. (1971). An empirical analysis of organisational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 213–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisbona, A. (2005). La gestión de la diversidad. En F.J. Palací (Ed.), Psicología de las Organizaciones (pp. 279–300). Madrid: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Lisbona, A. (2007). Socialización organizational, identidad e iniciativa personal: Un estudio multifactorial. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Lisbona, A., Morales, J. F. & Palací, F. J. (2006). Identidad y compromiso en equipos de intervención en emergencias. Psicothema, 18, 407–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodahal, T. M. & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and. measurement of job involvement. Journal of. Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-araujo, B., Osca, A. & Peiró, J. M. (2007). El papel modulador de la implicación con el trabajo en la relación entre el estrés y la satisfacción laboral. Psicothema, 19 (1), 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F. & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F. & Tetrick, L. E. (1992). Identifying organizational identification. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 813–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. H. & Mcminn, J. G. (2001). Self- Categorization and work-Group Socialization. En M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social Identity Proceses in Organziational Contexts (pp. 87–100). Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A. (2007). Las organizaciones en red y sus nuevas identidades. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A. & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relation: reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munné, F. (2005). ¿Qué es la complejidad? Encuentros en Psicología Social, 3, 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. (2006). Caos, complejidad y consultoría. En S. Quijano (Dir.), Dirección d Recursos Humanos y consultoría en las organizaciones (pp. 171–200). Barcelona: Icaria.
   Google Scholar
• O'reilly, C. & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational Commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouwerkerk, J. W., Ellemers N. & De Gilder, D. (1999). Group commitment and individual effort in experimental and organizational contexts. En N. Ellemerrs, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Contexts, commitment, content (pp. 184–204). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T. (2003). A social identity approach to communucation in organizations. En S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work. Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 81–98). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be o not to be: central questions in organiaional identification. En D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building Theory through Conversations (pp. 171–207). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rotondi, T. (1975). Organizational Identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R. (1997). Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 491–502.
   Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., Simon, B. & Loewy, M. I. (2008). Intraorganizational respect and organizational participation: The mediating role of collective identity.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tafjel, H. (1978). Differentation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Londres: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, D. J. & Callan, V. J. (1998). In group bias in response to an organizational merger. Group Dynamics, 2, 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A Self-Categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. En C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 171–204). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R. & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129–149.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., Wagner, U. & Gautam, T. (2002). Identifikation in Organizationen: Theoretische Zusammenhänge und empirische Befunde. [Identification in organizations: theoretical relationships and empirical evidence] En E. Witte (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie wirtschaftlicher Prozesse [Social psychology of economic processes] (S. 147–173). Lengerich: Pabst.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. & Oliver, C. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77 (2), 171–191.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 692–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. & Sleebos, E. (2006). Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 571–584
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B. Monden, L. & De Lima, F. (2002).Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 233–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. & Van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to postmerger identification. En M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts (pp. 249–264). Filadelfia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D. & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, E. & Van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Organizational Identification Following a Merger: The importance of agreeing to differ. En S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. Platow & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work. Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 205–221). Nueva York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, M. (2002). Dilemmas of cooperation and compliance: identity, justice and norms. Trabajo presentado en el 18° Coloquio de Estudios del Grupo Europeo de Organizaciones, Barcelona, 4 a 6 de julio.
   Google Scholar
• Yubero, S. & Morales, J. F. (2006). La identificación en las organizaciones y su relación con la prototipicidad y el conflicto enre grupos profesionales. Psicothema, 18, 400–406.
   Google Scholar