Referencias

• Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Broude, G. J. (1992). The May-September algorithm meets the 20th century actuarial table. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 94–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (2003). La evolución del deseo. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary Psychology. The New Science of the Mind. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K. & Leblanc, G. J. (2000). Number of Children Desired and Preferred Spousal Age Difference: Context-specific Mate Preference Patterns across 37 Cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D. Y Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., Oskamp, S. & Sparks, W. (1977). Courtship American style-newspaper adds. Family Coordinator, 26, 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M., Zalenski, C. M. & Clark, M. E. (1986). Is there a double standard of aging? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 771–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, CH. (1991). El origen del hombre y la selección en relación al sexo (1a edición en inglés de 1871). Madrid: Editorial EDAF.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn M. J., Brinton, S. & Clark, L. (2010). Universal sex differences in online advertisers age preferences: comparing data from 14 cultures and 2 religious groups. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 383–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etcoff, N. (2000). La supervivencia de los más guapos. Madrid: Debate.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Burmann, C., Peláez, F. & Sánchez, S. (2002a). Elección de pareja estable a través de anuncios de periódico. Psicothema, 14, 268–273.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Burmann, C., Peláez, F. & Sánchez, S. (2002b). Mate Choice Differences According to Sex and Age. An Analysis of Personal Advertisements in Spanish Newspapers. Human Nature, 13, 493–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V. & Stanley, J. C. (1974). Métodos Estadísticos aplicados a las Ciencias Sociales. Madrid: Prentice/Hall Inter-nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, S. (2010). Essential evolutionary psychology. Los Ángeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. A. & Saedd, L. (1977). Ler's make a deal: Analysis of revelations and stipulations in lonely hearts advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. & Vaughan, G.M. (2005). Social psychology. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T. (1994). Evolutionary Social Psychology: From Sexual Selection to Social Cognition. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 75–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Gabrielids, C., Keefe, R. C. & Cornelius, J. S. (1996). Adolescents' age preferences for dating partners: Support for an evolutionary model of life-history strategies. Child Development, 67, 1499–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T. & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age Preference in Mates Reflect Sex Differences in Human Reproductive Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., Keefe, R. C., Bryan, A., Barr, A. & Brown S. (1995). Age Preferences and Mate Choice Among Homosexuals and Heterosexuals: A Case for Modular Psychological Mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1166–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kite, M. E., Deaux, K. Y Miele, M. (1991). Stereotypes of young and old: Does age outweigh gender?. Psychology and Aging, 6, 19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama, N. F., Mcgain, A. & Hill, R. A. (2004). Self-reported mate preferences and “feminist” attitudes regarding marital relations. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauzen, M. M. & Dozier, D. M. (2005). Maintaining the Double Standard: Portrayals of Age and Gender in Popular Films. Sex Roles, 52, 437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, A. E. & Allen, M. P. (2004). Double Jeopardy in Hollywood: Age and Gender in the careers of Film Actors, 1926–1999. Sociological Forum, 19, 611–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otta, E., Da Silva Queiroz, R., De Sousa Campos, L., Dowbor DA Silva, M. W. & Telles Silveira, M. (1999). Age Differences Between Spouses in a Brazilian Marriage Simple. Evolution and Human Behavior 20, 99–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Over, R. & Phillips, G. (1997). Differences between men and women in age preferences for a same-sex partner. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 138–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverthorne Z. A. B. A. & Quinsey, V. L. (2000). Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29, 67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami, V. & Furnham, A. (2008). The Psychology of Physical Attraction. Nueva York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Symons, D. (1992). What do men want? (1992). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 113–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todosijeviç, B., Ljubinkoviç, S. & Aranãiç, A. (2003). Mate selection criteria: A trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology, 1, 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. M. & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 149–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, N. & Thornhill, P. A. A. (1992). The preferred age of a potential mate reflects evolved male sexual psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 114–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar