Publication Cover
International Journal of Social Psychology
Revista de Psicología Social
Volume 27, 2012 - Issue 3
176
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Power increases the reliance on first-impression thoughts

El poder aumenta el uso de las primeras impresiones

, &
Pages 293-303 | Received 30 Aug 2011, Accepted 02 May 2012, Published online: 23 Jan 2014

References

  • Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. (2001). Social status in naturalistic face-to-face groups: Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132.
  • Briñol, P., & Demarree, K. G. (Eds.) (2012). Social metacognition. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Briñol, P., Gandarillas, B., Horcajo, J., & Becerra, A. (2010). Emoción y meta-cognición: Implicaciones para el cambio de actitud. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 157–183.
  • Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123–1139.
  • Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2009). Persuasion: Insights from the self-validation hypothesis. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 69–118). New York, NY: Elsevier.
  • Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., Valle, C., Rucker, D. D., & Becerra, A. (2007). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 1040–1053.
  • Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & Wagner, B. C. (2009). Body postures effects on self-evaluation: A self-validation approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1053–1064.
  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought listing technique. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309–342). New York: Guilford.
  • Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Yap, A. J. (2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21, 1363–1368.
  • Carney, D. R., Hall, J., & Lebeau, L. (2005). Beliefs about the nonverbal expression of social power.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29, 105–123.
  • Copeland, J. T. (1994). Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 264–277.
  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & P. Glick (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS Map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
  • Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (Eds.) (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41.
  • Epley, N. & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Divergent processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396.
  • Festinger, L., & Thibaut, J. (1951). Interpersonal Communications in Small Groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 92–100.
  • Fischer, J., Fischer, P., Englich, B., Aydin, N., & Frey, D. (2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1146–1154.
  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–621.
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
  • Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
  • Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 247–262.
  • Guinote, A. (2007). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697.
  • Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708–721.
  • Guinote, A., & Vescio, T. (2010). The Social Psychology of Power. New York: Guildford Press.
  • Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, S., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, V. (2000). Power bias impression formation processes: stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 227–256.
  • Holtgraves, T. M. & Lasky, B. (1999). Linguistic power and persuasion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 196–205.
  • Hosman, L. A. (1989). The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: Powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research, 15, 383–406.
  • Huang, L., Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Guillory, L. E. (2011). Powerful postures vs. Powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22, 95–102.
  • Johnson, C. S., & Lammers, J. (2012). The powerful disregard social comparison information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 329–334.
  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60.
  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
  • Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1996). Extremism, power, and the imagined basis of social conflict. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 101–105.
  • Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt?. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33–41.
  • Lammers, J., & Yang, H. (2012). Feelings of power lead people to take sides with other powerful parties. Revista de Psicología Social, 27, 337–346
  • Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1989). Newcomers and old-timers in small groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed, pp. 143–186). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ng, S. H. (1980). The social psychology of power. London: Academic Press.
  • Parker, G. A., & Rubenstein, D. I. (1981). Role assessment, reserve strategy, and acquisition of information in asymmetric animal conflicts. Animal Behavior, 29, 221–240.
  • Petty, R. E. & Briñol, P. (2012). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Three decades of research. In P.A.M. Van Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 224–245). London, UK: Sage.
  • Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 722–741.
  • Petty, R. E., Briñol, P., Tormala, Z. L., & Wegener, D. T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer Verlag.
  • Rodríguez-bailón, R., Moya, M. & Yzerbyt, V. (2000). Why do superiors attend to negative stereotypic information about their subordinates? Effects of power legitimacy on social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 651–671.
  • Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C. & Vivekanthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294.
  • Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to Acquire: Powerlessness and Compensatory Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257–226.
  • See, K. E., Morrison, E. W., Rothman, N. B., & Soll, J. B. (2011). The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advise taking, and accuracy. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 272–285.
  • Slabu, L., & Guinote, A. (2010). Getting what you want: Power increases the accessibility of active goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 344–349.
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.
  • Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances inexperimental social psychology (Vol., 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.