References
- Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.
- Baumeister, R. F., Blatslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.
- Brockner, J., Shaw, M. C., & Rubin, J. Z. (1979). Factors affecting withdrawal from an escalating conflict: Quitting before it's too late. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 492–503.
- Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotypes. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628.
- Fiske, S. T., & Dépret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 31–61). Sussex, UK: John Willey & Sons Ltd.
- Förster, J., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 220–239.
- Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
- Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & A. J. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 287–312). New York: Guilford.
- Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
- Guinote, A. (2007a). Behavior variability and the situated focus theory of power. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 256–295). New York: Wiley.
- Guinote, A. (2007b). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697.
- Guinote, A. (2007c). Power and goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1076–1087.
- Guinote, A. (2008). Power and affordances: When the situation has more power over powerful than over powerless individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 237–252.
- Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708–721.
- Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
- Overbeck, J., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565.
- Overbeck, J., & Park, B. (2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of power-holders' social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 227–243.
- Smith, P. K., Jostman, N., Galinsky, A. D., & Van Dijk, W. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441–447.
- Vescio, T. K., Snyder, M., & Butz, D. A. (2003). Power in stereotypically masculine domains: A social influence strategy x stereotype match model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1062–1078.