Referencias

• Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniega, L. & González, L. (2005). Other-oriented values and job satisfaction. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4, 128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Arciniega, L. & González, L. (2006). What is the influence of work values relative to other variables in the development of organizational commitment? Revista de Psicología Social, 21, 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670–687.
   Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. L. & Boehm-Kaufman, M. R. (2009). Four common misconceptions in exploratory factor analysis. En C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 61–87). Nueva York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B. & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Felfe, J., Schmook, R., Schyns, B. & Six, B. (2008). Does the form of employment make a difference? Commitment of traditional, temporary, and self-employed workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, F. J. & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellatly, I. R., Meyer, J. P. & Luchak, A. A. (2006). Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch's propositions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, T. F. & Guillén, M. (2008). Organizational commitment: A proposal for a wider ethical conceptualization of ‘normative commitment’. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 401–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbraum.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M. & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W. & Sincich, T. (1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 951–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Nueva York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, J. W., Price, J. L. & Mueller, C. W. (1997). Assessment of Meyer and Allen's three component model of organizational commitment in South Korea. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 961–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K.J. & Hong, S. (2001). Sample Size in Factor Analysis: The Role of Model Error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maccallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 64–89.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P. & Parfyonova, N. M. (2010). Normative commitment in the workplace: A theoretical analysis and re-conceptualization. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mundfrom D. J., Shaw D. G. & Tian L. K. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conductiong factor analysis. International Journal of Testing, 5, 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-gil, J. A., Chacón, S. & Moreno, R. (2000). Validez de constructo: El uso del análisis factorial exploratorio-confirmatorio para obtener evidencias de validez. Psicothema, 12, 442–446.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinger, O. N., Van Olffen, W. & Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 70–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F. & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar