Referencias

• Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos users' guide versión 4.0. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, A. N. & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C. & Laganke, J. S. (2002). Computermediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 156–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Nueva York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactoor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. Implications for data aggregation and analysis. En K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and, methods in organization (pp. 349–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M. J. & Dunlap, W. P. (2002). Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user's guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S. & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejoy, D. M. & Wilson, M. G. (2003). Organizational health promotion: Broadening the horizon of workplace health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17, 337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E. & Spangler, W. D. (2004). Transformational leadership and team performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behaviors in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, D. & Mallery, M. (2001). Using SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• González-romá, V., Peiró, J. M., Subirats, M. & Mañas, M. A. (2000). The validity of affective work team climates. En M. Vartiainen, F. Avallone, & N. Anderson (Eds.), Innovative theories, tools and practices in work and organizational psychology (pp. 97–109). Götting: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Gooding, R. Z. & Wagner, J. A. (1985). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between size and performance: The productivity and efficiency of organizations and their subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 462–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, S. A. & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski, R. & Mohammed, S. (1997). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
   Google Scholar
• Knippenberg, D. & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorens, S., Salanova, M. & Losilla, J. (2009). Liderazgo transformacional y capital psicológico positivo: un estudio de caso en una empresa de construcción. Directivos Construcción, 220, 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• López-zafra, E. & Morales, F. (1999). Niveles de análisis en el estudio del liderazgo carismático. Revista de Psicología Social, 14, 181–197.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. En G. A. Marcoulides, & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling, issues and techniques (pp. 315–353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, J. P. (1992). Focus from the start—employee orientation programs—Orientation. HR Magazine, 37, 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Molero, F. (2011). Liderazgo transformacional y carismático. En F. Molero & J. F. Morales (Eds.), Liderazgo hecho y ficción. Visiones actuales (pp. 117–143). Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Molero, F., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M. & Morales, F. (2007). Relations and effects of transformational leadership: A comparative analysis with traditional leaership styles. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 358–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molero, F., Recio, P. & Cuadrado, I. (2010). Liderazgo transformacional y liderazgo transaccional: un análisis de la estructura factorial del Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) en una muestra española. Psicothema, 22, 495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnaly, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Osca, A. & García-salmones, L. (2010). El impacto del tamaño y la diversidad en los procesos y resultados grupales. Psicothema, 22, 137–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peiró, J. M., González-romá, V., Ripoll, P. & Gracia, F. J. (2001). Role stress and work team variables in primary health care teams: A structural equations model. En J. De Jonge, P. Vlerick, A. Büssing, & W. B. Schaufeli (Eds.), Organizational psychology and health care at the start of the new millennium (pp. 105–122). München: Rainer Hampp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. M., Lee, J. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method variance in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal Applied of Psychology, 88, 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, A., Sarrió, M., Barberá, E. & Candela, C. (2002). Mujeres directivas y demandas organizacionales. Revista de Psicología Social, 17, 183–192
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, A. E. & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M. (2008). Organizaciones saludables y desarrollo de recursos humanos. Estudios Financieros, 303, 179–214.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Agut, S. & Peiró, J. M. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1217–1227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E. & Martínez, I. M. (2012). Development and validation of a Healthy and Resilient Organizations (HERO) model. Manuscrito sometido para su publicación.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Llorens, S., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic groups: An experimental study. Small Groups Research, 34, 43–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Lorente, L., Chambel, M. J. & Martínez, I. M. (2011). Linking transformational leadership to extra rol behavior: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work engagement. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2256–2266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Martínez, I. M., Cifre, E. & Llorens, S. (2009). La salud ocupacional desde la perspectiva psicosocial: aspectos teóricos y conceptuales. En M. Salanova (Ed.), Psicología de la salud ocupacional (pp. 27–61). Madrid: Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M., Martínez, I. M. & Llorens, S. (2005). ¿Cómo se relacionan los obstáculos y facilitadores organizacionales con el burnout docente? Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 21, 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2004). Engagement: un reto emergente para la dirección de los recursos humanos. Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social, 261, 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Salanova, M. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). El engagement en el trabajo. Cuando el trabajo se convierte en pasión. Madrid. Editorial Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, E. (2006). Dos textos: sobre el desempeño individual en las organizaciones. Monografias de Administración, 93, 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter, S. L., Lim, S. & Murphy, L. R. (1996). Organizational health: A new paradigm for occupational stress research at NIOSH. Occupational Mental Health, 4, 248–254.
   Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. & Cha, S. A. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1020–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González- Romá, V. & Barker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Barker, A. B. (2006). Dr. Jeckyll or Mr. Hyde: On the differences between work engagement and workaholism. En R. J. Burke (Eds.), Research companion to working time and work addiction (pp. 193–217). Northhampton, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. En S. Leinhardt (Eds.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. L. & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrente, P., Salanova, M., Llorens, S. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). Teams make it work: How team work engagement mediates between social resources and performance in teams. Psicothema, 24, 106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., Rittman, A. L. & Marks, M. A. (2001). Team Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 12, 451–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar