Referencias

• Alkin, M. C. (1969). Evaluation theory development, Evaluation Comment, 2, 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Alkin, M. C.; Daillak, R., y White, P. (1979). Using evaluations, Beverly Hills, Ca, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, L. H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior, Social Problems, 18, 298–306.
   Google Scholar
• Buttram, J. L., y Wilson, B. L. (1987). Promising trends in teacher evaluation, Teacher Leadership, 44, 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (1987). What have we learned about the politics of program evaluation, Evaluation Practice, 8, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E., y Franco, R. (1988). Evaluación de proyectos sociales, Buenos Aires, GEL.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., et al. (1980). Towards reform of program evaluation, San Francisco, Ca, Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs, San Francisco, Ca., Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. L., y Schwab, D. P. (1973). Perfomance in organization. Determinants and appraisal, Glenview, Il., Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• EVALUATION RESEARCH SOCIETY (1981). Standards for program evaluation, Potomac, Md., Evaluation Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, H. E. (1977). The present status of evaluation research. En M. Guttentag y S. Saar (eds.) Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V., y Ellet, F. S. (1980). Evaluation research, Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 211–28.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. (1987). Naturalistic evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 34, 23–43.
   Google Scholar
• House, E. R. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models, Educational Researcher, 7, 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• House, E. R. (1981). Evaluating with validity, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. M. (1988). Social psychology, Past and present. An integrative orientation, Hillsdale, N.J., Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Janowitz, M. (1970). Political conflict: Essays in political sociology, Chicago, Ill., Quadrangle.
   Google Scholar
• JOINT COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION (1981). Standards for evaluations of educational programs, projects and materials, New York, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• JOINT COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators, Newbury Park, Ca, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, F. M., y Snow, R. (1981). Evaluación del rendimiento de los trabajadores de la salud, Ginebra, OMS.
   Google Scholar
• Kellaghan, T. (1982). Los sistemas escolares como objeto de evaluación. En D.L. Stufflebeam, T. Kellaghan y B. Alvarez (eds) La evaluación educativa, Bogotá, Universidad Pontificia Javeriana.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, K. (1984). Evaluating planned organizational change, Londres, Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1972). Integration of economics and other sciences through policy analysis. En J.C. Charlesworth (ed) Integration of the social sciences through policy analysis, Philadelphia, AAPS.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhal, R. A. (1986). Implementing a new evaluation system for municipals: An experience in planned change, Planing and Changing, 17, 224–31.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G.; Scriven, M., y Stufflebeam, D. (1983). Evaluation models, Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, R. N. (1976). The appraisal interview: Three basic approaches, La Jolla, Ca., University As.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S (1983). Program evaluation and administrative control, Policy Studies Review, 2, 371–90.
   Google Scholar
• Moyniham, D. P. (1986). Family and nation, Nueva York, Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Oskamp, S. (1984). Applied social psychology, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, T. R. (1973). Educational evaluation by adversary proceedings. En E.R. House (ed.) School evaluation: The politics and process, Berkeley, Ca., McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. D. (1984). Can social scientists be effective actors in the political arena?. En R.L Shotland y M. Mark (eds.) Sociasl science and social policy, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PHI DELTA KAPPA NATIONAL STUDY COMMITTEE ON EVALUATION (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making, Itasca, Ill., Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, J. (1974). Evaluation in education: Current applications, Berkeley, Ca, McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Provus, M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation, Berkeley, Ca., McCutchan.
   Google Scholar
• Rebolloso, E. (1987). La investigación de evaluacion vista a través de los “Evaluation Studies Review Annual”, Revista de Psicología Social, 3–4, 183–224.
   Google Scholar
• Rebolloso, E. (1990). Comentario a Intervención psicosocial: implicaciones sociopolíticas, Revista de Psicología Social, 5, 291–96.
   Google Scholar
• Rebolloso, E. (1991). Algunos apuntes sobre la utilidad de la evaluación en el marco de la toma de decisiones políticas, Actas del III Congreso Nacional de Psicología Social, 1, 567–74.
   Google Scholar
• Redfern, G. B. (1980). Evaluating teachers and administrators, Boulder, Co., Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H.; Freeman, H. E., y Wright, S. R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., y Freeman, H. E (1992). Evaluation: A systematic approach, Beverly Hills, Ca, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rutman, L. (1977). Evaluation research methods: A basic guide, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rutman, L. (1980). Planning useful evaluations: Evaluability assessment, Beverly Hills, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. L., y Shore, A. R. (1979). Why sociology does not apply, Nueva York, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation, Teachers College Record, 68, 7. y 52340.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1976). A theoretical statement of responsive evaluation, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2, 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H., y Helm, V. M. (1991). Evaluating professional support personnel in education, Newbury Park, Ca., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). Systematic evaluation, Dordretch, Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L. (1987). Evaluación sistemática: Guía teórica y práctica, Barcelona, Paidós Ibérica.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L., y Webster, W. J. (1980). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3, 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. L., et al. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making, Itaska, Ill., Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, E. A. (1972). Action for what?. A critique of evaluation research. En R. O'toole (ed.) The organization management and tactics of social research, Cambridge, Schenkma.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. (1942). General statement on evaluation, Journal of Educational Research, 35, 492–501.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Chicago, Ill., Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U. S. GENERAL ACCOUNTIG OFFICE (1978). Assessing social program impact evaluation: A checklist approach, Washington D. C., U. S. General Acounting Office.
   Google Scholar
• Vander Zanden, J. W. (1977). Social psychology, Nueva York, Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1977). Where politics and evaluation research meet, Evaluation, 1, 37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey, J.S. (1983). Evaluation and effective public management, Boston, Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wortman, P. M. (1983). Evaluation research: A methodological perspective, Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 223–60.
   Google Scholar